Magpies v Canterbury

[Higgins]

Aaaaargh another sitter dropped from the kick off to the second half.

[Nepia]

WTF, I miss the first 3 minutes of the 2nd half and Canterbury gets 10 points.

[Stockcar86]

@Nepia said in Magpies v Canterbury:

WTF, I miss the first 3 minutes of the 2nd half and Canterbury gets 10 points.

no more toilet breaks for you

[Nepia]

@Stockcar86 said in Magpies v Canterbury:

@Nepia said in Magpies v Canterbury:

WTF, I miss the first 3 minutes of the 2nd half and Canterbury gets 10 points.

no more toilet breaks for you

It was a played PS4 too long in the break

[Higgins]

And they score a converted try from it. Anyone seen any Indian bookmakers at the ground?

[Nepia]

How is that a Canterbury feed? It's the Canterbury players job to hold on to the ball.

[Higgins]

Two new props on with absolutely no difference too, sadly reverse gear it getting a big workout tonight.

[Higgins]

In case anyone is interested it is Hawkes Bay 10 - 27 Canterbury after fifty seven minutes.

[SammyC]

@Higgins said in Magpies v Canterbury:

In case anyone is interested it is Hawkes Bay 10 - 27 Canterbury after fifty seven minutes.

Very interested, I took Canterbury with an 18 point start at the TAB

[Higgins]

I think you are looking pretty safe, it is only a matter of time before the visitors score again.

[Stockcar86]

Ref saves us there

[Higgins]

No he didn't, the Canterbury blindside clearly entered the ruck well in front of the ball when he took out the HB player.

[Gunner]

Bizarre decision there.

Allardyce made himself part of the ruck, so that Canterbury player had every right to clean him out.

[Nepia]

I really need to learn how to post gifs - I have floodgates ones ready to go!

[Higgins]

@Gunner Interesting point you make Gunner but where is the off side line in situations like that? He appeared to join from the side and in front of the Canterbury halfback who had the ball in his hands.

[Nepia]

@Higgins said in Magpies v Canterbury:

@Gunner Interesting point you make Gunner but where is the off side line in situations like that? He appeared to join from the side and in front of the Canterbury halfback who had the ball in his hands.

Yeah, I tend to think it should have been a penalty to Canterbury for the first infringement - Allardice on the half, no try as Princip illegally cleared out and opened the hole.

[Stockcar86]

Our scrum looks good against 7

[Nepia]

Bloody hell, Bateman was standing in our backline when he made a tackle in that passage.

[Higgins]

@Stockcar86 said in Magpies v Canterbury:

Our scrum looks good against 7

The lineouts don't though.

[Gunner]

@Higgins said in Magpies v Canterbury:

@Gunner Interesting point you make Gunner but where is the off side line in situations like that? He appeared to join from the side and in front of the Canterbury halfback who had the ball in his hands.

I'd have to watch again but I didn't think the 9 had it?

I thought he looked square on when he made the clean out (there is no gate as such these days), so fair game.

At the very least should have been a penalty for interfering with the halfback.