• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
159 Posts 32 Posters 12.6k Views
Crusaders v Blues
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #78

    that was rough on Duffie, reckon there would be grounds to ping Akira there.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #79

    Fuck off. You can stay on your line.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #80

    Robbed. That penalty was horseshit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #81

    woulda taken the points...?

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #82

    Some things in life never seem to change !!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #83

    Christ, what a choke. Never committed to attack in the second half.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #84

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Blues:

    woulda taken the points...?

    but what do I know!

    Cant help but be impressed with the Crusaders, gee if they can play an 80 minute game!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    The Blues are a dumb team. Why try to run it everytime from inside your own 22? Play for territory and make an ordinary Crusaders backline beat you. Giving away penalties allowed the Crusaders to dominate through their lineout and scrum.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #86

    Pulu was terrible in the second half. Did nothing but appeal for penalties. Another Blues season over.

    NZRU must step in now. Provide a cash injection for player retention and sign a top notch coach. Can't keep losing players like Piutau and Luatua and succeed.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    I'd have to check tape, but it looked like the refereeing didn't help the Blues once they started to do dumb shit.

    Also, do the Blues have a forward coach? Why does Parson get to play at this level? What exactly does Akira do when he comes on? How is Prattley a professional rugby player? Guyton should be made to walk home.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #88

    @Chris-B. said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @Chris-B. and the Blues look to be targetting there too.

    Yeah - I think we're fucked this week. Too many holes to fill.

    No faith!

    Wow. Just wow. We've recruited or are developing some of the depth that Toddy never did. Or perhaps, some of the guys Toddy recruited have just come of age.

    Sam Whitelock was huge in that game. So, actually, was Mitch Hunt.

    Crotty, Douglas, Samu, Romano, Barrett, Alaalatoa, Crockett, Funnell, Bridge, Bateman, Havili, Drummond. A whole lot of young guys and second stringers.

    Three weeks in a row we've come from nowhere to win.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #89

    @Tim said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Pulu was terrible in the second half. Did nothing but appeal for penalties. Another Blues season over.

    NZRU must step in now. Provide a cash injection for player retention and sign a top notch coach. Can't keep losing players like Piutau and Luatua and succeed.

    The Blues shouldn't get special help. Their poor performances are their own fault.

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #90

    @hydro11 The NZRU has no reason to tolerate consistent failure, especially in their biggest market. They're not a science experiment, they're a business.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #91

    Cracking game! Very predictable 2nd half but much better Blues performance. The midfield out and outside backs were excellent - even Collins!

    You have to remember the Crusaders have 7 All Black tight 5 players - it told in the end.

    How the fuck did Simon Hickey keep Mitch Hunt on the bench 2 years ago for Auckland - Paul Feeney you are a fucking moron.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #92

    @Tim said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @hydro11 The NZRU has no reason to tolerate consistent failure, especially in their biggest market. They're not a science experiment, they're a business.

    The Blues do well in general. They just suck against New Zealand teams and the competition punishes them for that. Making the Blues do better will just be at the expense of other New Zealand teams and it is something that wouldn't be afforded to another franchise.

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    muddyriver
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #93

    @KiwiMurph a player can get a whole lot better in 2 years. Hunt wasn't even starting 10 for Ta$man last year. Feeny had the Auckland backline humming

    DiceD KiwiMurphK 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #94

    @hydro11 Do you think that the NZRU is a disinterested observer dedicated to objective analysis of provincial organisations?

    Their objective is to maximise the performance of NZ Rugby. That means that they have to deliver performance for their largest market.

    They run the game. They contract the players. Tolerating continual non-performance in their largest market is negligence. What kind of competent business would operate like that?

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #95

    @Tim said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @hydro11 Do you think that the NZRU is a disinterested observer dedicated to objective analysis of provincial organisations?

    Their objective is to maximise the performance of NZ Rugby. That means that they have to deliver performance for their largest market.

    They run the game. They contract the players. Tolerating continual non-performance in their largest market is negligence. What kind of competent business would operate like that?

    In what sort of competition does the national governing body intervene to ensure that their favourite team wins?

    It would be like the NRL letting the Storm breach the salary cap because they want to grow the game in Melbourne. It's preposterous.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    I did not say win the competition. I said ensure competence. You have created a strawman there.

    NZ Rugby could not be more different to the NRL. There are many franchises in Sydney, not one. Players are centrally contracted by the NZRU. They have near total control of everything. They cannot abdicate responsibility in their largest market.

    If they want to keep losing ground to soccer in Auckland, they are going the right way.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #97

    Looking at the Crusaders starting line-up:

    1 - first choice/AB
    2 - first choice/AB
    3 - first choice/AB
    4 - first choice/AB
    5 - first choice/AB
    6 - first choice
    7 - injury replacement
    8 - injury replacement
    9 - rotating duo
    10 - injury replacement
    11 - injury replacement
    12 - first choice/AB
    13 - injury replacement (and a late one, too)
    14 - injury replacement
    15 - injury replacement

    Very heavy at the front, very light at the back.

    TimT StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    2

Crusaders v Blues
Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.