Aussie Cricket
-
Next pitch preparation is going to be fascinating. India can surely bowl better (except that spinner Udav who looks like shit and a chucker).
But the Aussies have a situation where slow bowlers rooted the home side up to the kidneys, so a raging turner is a risk, all predicated on the toss.
-
And this, dear reader, is why I thought Harbhajan Singh was always an utterly graceless fluffybunny:
“I will have to see him bowl on a good Test match wicket. Not this one. Till then, I will reserve my comments,” the 103-Test veteran was quoted as saying in The Indian Express.
Harbhajan, who averaged 38.90 per wicket outside of India but a far more impressive 28.76 on the spin-friendly wickets at home, intimated O’Keefe was simply the beneficiary of the rank turner prepared in Pune.
“You don’t need to flight the ball or anything,” he added.
“You just need to bowl fast and not give the batsmen room to either come down the track, or be able to manoeuvre the ball around.
“Bowling six deliveries in the same spot is all you need to get wickets on such tracks.”
Yes, well, you fucking dog's arse, you averaged 73 in Australia when you got "real" Test wickets, and under 30 in Asia when you got dirt bowls to chuck your shit on, without DRS, and very suspect conditions.
Your spinners got the same pitch ours did, and they were fucking dire. So eat a box of cocks, you racist, chucking, gobshite.
-
@NTA That's not very friendly, Nick.
Harbajhan always liked you guys. He said on camera that Australia was a much better option to travel to than NZ.
To be fair, that was just after our Quarantine people had pulled him over for not cleaning his boots and fined him $200.
-
The Board of Control for Cricket in India BCCI could be fined almost $A20,000 for producing a “poor” pitch in Pune, where the first Test finished inside three days. The controversial wicket, which was likened to “the surface of Mars” by Shane Warne, provided plenty of assistance for spinners from both Australia and India.
Steve O’Keefe spun the visitors to a 1-0 lead in the four-Test series by claiming a haul of 12-70, the best ever match figures by a visiting spinner in India. Local media have alleged Pune curator Pandurang Salgaonkar was forced to kowtow to BCCI chief curator Daljit Singh in the lead up – an Indian Express report claims ground staff were ordered to doctor the pitch, including the use of metallic brushes to scuff up the dry deck.
Match referee Chris Broad branded the pitch “poor” in his formal report and the BCCI now has 14 days to provide a response to the International Cricket Council, which will then review the matter and has the power to issue a warning or fine of $A19,500.
A similar scenario played out in Nagpur in 2015, when South Africa were spun out on a raging turner inside three days. Match referee Jeff Crowe rated that strip as “poor”. Yet, even if the BCCI is fined the full amount, it will amount to pocket change for the world’s most powerful cricket organisation.
The expectation is the pitch for the second Test, which starts in Bangalore on Saturday, will be far flatter.
The Pune track was widely criticised by former India players, with Sunil Gavaskar, Sourav Ganguly and Harbhajan Singh all claiming it helped Australia’s cause. Australia skipper Steve Smith suggested the hosts “played into our hands” by preparing the dry deck that delivered Australia’s first Test win in India since 2004.
Chief executives from cricket boards around the world flagged the need for stricter pitch punishments earlier this month at a round of ICC meetings. “Venues and boards should be more accountable for the standard of pitches and outfields they present for international matches,” the ICC said in a statement.
However, the proposed demerit point system would punish individual venues instead of boards. In this instance, the BCCI was reportedly responsible for the pitch doctoring.
AAP
-
I'm a bit torn on this. I actually don't mind a pitch that turns - it provides a point of difference to most pitches around the world and allows the spinners to really come into their own. It obviously wasn't impossible to bat on, otherwise how did Smith get a ton? The pitch they served up against SA last year was a fair bit worse from memory, but of course India won that match so the outrage was subdued.
At the end of the day India's batsmen were fucking dire and all this talk about the pitch is just a distraction from how poor they were. Some of the shots they got out too had nothing to do with the pitch - more a bowler putting it on the spot and the Indians getting frustrated.
I really don't want to see the ICC pushing for flat tracks everywhere. You play in SA you expect fast bouncy pitches. You play in Asia you expect dustbowls that turn a mile. You play in NZ you expect a green wicket (NZC A GREEN FUCKING WICKET PLEASE). That's part of the fun of the International game.
-
I loved that pitch. Was a fantastic test to watch. Great fun.
Not all the time, though, I suppose.
I find the traditional Indian wicket to be boring as. Win toss and bat for almost 2 days (if your good enough).
I liked all the pitches for NZ tour to India , just frustrated we lost all the tosses. They were interesting enough to give the poorer team a chance if they won the toss.
-
I said earlier in the year, i prefer that pitch to the fucking roads of Australia. They had to change the timing and the ball to make Adelaide tests watchable.
I'm sure the BCCI are devo over a $20K fine
-
@No-Quarter said in Aussie Cricket:
It obviously wasn't impossible to bat on, otherwise how did Smith get a ton?
A few dropped catches and complete misunderstanding of DRS helped
-
@NTA said in Aussie Cricket:
@No-Quarter said in Aussie Cricket:
It obviously wasn't impossible to bat on, otherwise how did Smith get a ton?
A few dropped catches and complete misunderstanding of DRS helped
I'd say the majority of hundreds scored require at least one, if not more fairly significant pieces of luck.
On a side note it was great to see India get fucked by the DRS.
-
@Donsteppa oi don't over egg it aye