Aussie Cricket
-
@NTA said in Aussie Cricket:
@nzzp said in Aussie Cricket:
@dogmeat said in Aussie Cricket
T/20 is a totally unnecessary abomination of the devil
I don't go that far, but India just showed us that T20 is a surprisingly good preparation for test cricket. Honestly, I didn't believe the skills would transfer, but the evidence suggests I was wrong.
Did they, tho?
I think they did. 9 of the 11 in the last test were T20 players predominantly. They came out of IPL;I think Sundar hadn't played FC cricket in three years.
So yeah, I think they probably did
-
A bit of material for @NTA to jerk off to
-
@No-Quarter soured by his complete lack of current form. Difficult wank.
-
-
-
@NTA said in Aussie Cricket:
@MN5 I know you rangas are slow on the uptake, but I didn't actually say he was as good as them.
I'm allowed to get outraged based on assuming things, it's the interweb after all.
Speaking of rangas Shaun Pollock was a hell of an all rounder and some people rate Ben Stokes too.
-
@NTA said in Aussie Cricket:
Having said that:
Bowlers to take more Test wickets at a better strike-rate than Mitchell Starc when he's on his period.
Matt Henry
Matthew Hoggard
Jackson Bird
Darrell TuffyNot end of list
Happy birthday to the Australian sulkster
😉
-
-
How ... Why... do you have a toasted sandwich in your pocket ...
Get that out of your pocket! Langer hits back at coaching concerns as bizarre toastie incident emerges
Langer hits back at bombshell coaching claim as bizarre toastie incident emerges
-
@booboo said in Aussie Cricket:
How ... Why... do you have a toasted sandwich in your pocket ...
Get that out of your pocket! Langer hits back at coaching concerns as bizarre toastie incident emerges
Langer hits back at bombshell coaching claim as bizarre toastie incident emerges
Ran out of muffins?
-
@Siam said in Aussie Cricket:
To be fair, Starc is an absolute gun, a very fine bowler. His off days are peculiar though
He is seriously good but better with a white ball. Strike rate isn't really the best way to look at him in tests I don't think because when he has an off day he leaks runs. 3.35 econ and an average of 27.6. Not as good as Wags and only slightly better than Southee and Boult.
Cummins is the standout obviously in all regards. Hazlewood not too far behind.@booboo said in Aussie Cricket:
How ... Why... do you have a toasted sandwich in your pocket ...
Was it hot? Hand warmer? Willy warmer? Was the yellow filling cheese, or yellow sandpaper? Too many questions.
-
@Siam said in Aussie Cricket:
@NTA said in Aussie Cricket:
Having said that:
Bowlers to take more Test wickets at a better strike-rate than Mitchell Starc when he's on his period.
Matt Henry
Matthew Hoggard
Jackson Bird
Darrell TuffyNot end of list
Happy birthday to the Australian sulkster
😉
Ouch
-
-
@MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:
The underarm incident was a boring, overblown non event 40 years ago.
How people still feel the need to wank on about it to this day is completely beyond me.
holy shit
the absolute blackest of pots calling out a kettle right here
-
@mariner4life said in Aussie Cricket:
@MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:
The underarm incident was a boring, overblown non event 40 years ago.
How people still feel the need to wank on about it to this day is completely beyond me.
holy shit
the absolute blackest of pots calling out a kettle right here
Not sure what you're getting at, am I missing something ?
-
@MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Cricket:
@MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:
The underarm incident was a boring, overblown non event 40 years ago.
How people still feel the need to wank on about it to this day is completely beyond me.
holy shit
the absolute blackest of pots calling out a kettle right here
Not sure what you're getting at, am I missing something ?
Obviously February 1981.
It was huge news. Involved governments and was the first time anyone saw that the Australian public had a soul😉
-
I've always been a bit perplexed by underarm. It still resonates so strongly, and yet what Australia did was entirely legal at the time. It seems to be the 80s equivalent to Sandpapergate, and yet they are completely different situations with only one actually outside the rules of the game.
I don't agree with the decision to bowl underarm, but still to be talking about it 40 years later?
