Crusaders vs Blues
-
@African-Monkey said in Crusaders vs Blues:
Well played Crusaders. Good wake up call for the Blues.
Blues could even get passed by Brumbies next week too can't they?
That was a good tough game. -
So Crusaders have a genuine chance at the playoffs. However, if there is a tie break it comes down to most wins. Crusaders have a lot of bonus points, but one less win than the teams they would be level with. So they need to hope other teams aren't picking up bonus points.
-
-
@African-Monkey said in Crusaders vs Blues:
Well played Crusaders. Good wake up call for the Blues.
Ta'avao is a bench scrummager despite his size. Eklund is too small to start when Riccitelli is available. Choat and Sotutu were poor. Perofeta stunk up the place.
-
Thankfully we shouldn't encounter another scrum as good again, they beat us badly there.
-
This would've been much worse without Funaki who must be in the AB squad now.
-
@antipodean He won't, but he's bloody good.
-
@Gunner said in Crusaders vs Blues:
I’d like to see the penalty count.
Really surprised no one else is talking about how shocking the Blues discipline was.
For me it was the biggest difference, if the Blues didn’t give away so many penalties, they’d have won.
13 v 8, according to ESPN
-
@Gunner said in Crusaders vs Blues:
I’d like to see the penalty count.
Really surprised no one else is talking about how shocking the Blues discipline was.
For me it was the biggest difference, if the Blues didn’t give away so many penalties, they’d have won.
Leadership issue.
-
@Machpants said in Crusaders vs Blues:
@Gunner said in Crusaders vs Blues:
I’d like to see the penalty count.
Really surprised no one else is talking about how shocking the Blues discipline was.
For me it was the biggest difference, if the Blues didn’t give away so many penalties, they’d have won.
13 v 8, according to ESPN
That surprises me, I feel like the Blues gave away a lot more than that.