• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

QF - Canterbury v Auckland

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
canterburyauckland
122 Posts 18 Posters 3.2k Views
QF - Canterbury v Auckland
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #81

    That try to Murray may save Lam from a card.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #82

    Canterbury definitely the better team but I question whether this comp should have quarter finals. The quality simply isn't there.

    It made more sense when the comp was split to have split semi finals.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    wrote on last edited by
    #83

    Poor officiating -- a score doesn't rescind foul play.... (or penalty advantage to be fair)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #84

    Murray has been a real spark. Plays with energy and is tough as nails. Love the try but the clean out he did at an attacking ruck a minute or so earlier was excellent.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #85

    @KiwiMurph said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

    Canterbury definitely the better team but I question whether this comp should have quarter finals. The quality simply isn't there.

    It made more sense when the comp was split to have split semi finals.

    Yeah the QFs in a comp with this many team smacks of everyone gets a go attitude

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #86

    Could Lam have been anymore casual about it.

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    He dropped that

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #88

    @ACT-Crusader sums up Auckland. They would do so much better if they actually put everything into their play.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    Why not have a better kicker?

    Penalty / droppie to go to extra time??

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #90

    Meh. Both teams shit, but not as shit as the ref

    Auckland player of the match voting:
    https://www.forum.thesilverfern.com/topic/6350/auckland-motm-qf-canterbury/1

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #91

    Who do we play next week?

    KiwiMurphK Canes4lifeC StargazerS 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #92

    Well done Cantab. Deserving winners.

    Not a high quality game.

    Would be nice if next year Auckland picked some players from the best club and got some better coaches.

    I live in hope.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #93

    @ACT-Crusader said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

    Who do we play next week?

    There's 3 more quarter finals to go. Depends who wins.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #94

    @ACT-Crusader if Welly and Taranaki win you’ll be playing the Naki in New Plymouth.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #95

    @KiwiMurph

    I think you’ll find a few of the crap players were on multi year contracts. Should be some deadwood moving on now

    Worth noting some of the best players this year were the inexperienced tight 5, Clark, XTH etc.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by Stargazer
    #96

    @ACT-Crusader said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

    Who do we play next week?

    If Wellington wins, the 3rd ranked semi-finalist.
    If Wellington loses, the 4th ranked semi-finalist.

    No, not quite right. It all depends on who the highest ranked, 2nd-highest ranked, 3rd-highest ranked and lowest ranked winning quarter-finalists are.

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by Canes4life
    #97

    @Stargazer it’s all based on seeds. The highest seeded team plays the lowest seeded team until the final. So if Naki and Welly lose, Canterbury will become the highest seed.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by Stargazer
    #98

    @Canes4life It's exactly how I wrote it in my last sentence. I've actually looked it up in the Competition Regulation Handbook.

    Edit: If Wellington win, they are the highest ranked winning quarter-finalist; if Taranaki wins as well, they are the 2nd-ranked winning quarter-finalst, but if - say - Taranaki loses, then Canterbury become the 2nd-ranked winning quarter-finalist. etc etc

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #99

    @Stargazer you hadn’t updated your comment when I posted but yes, correct.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #100

    @Duluth said in QF - Canterbury v Auckland:

    @KiwiMurph

    I think you’ll find a few of the crap players were on multi year contracts. Should be some deadwood moving on now

    Worth noting some of the best players this year were the inexperienced tight 5, Clark, XTH etc.

    Been impressed with how he’s developed. From what I’ve seen this season he’s looked really solid. Has good athleticism around the park and at the lineout.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

QF - Canterbury v Auckland
Rugby Matches
canterburyauckland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.