Super Rugby 2023
-
@mariner4life said in Super Rugby 2023:
On the structure, i was only thinking the other day that the Super level may have sorted itself, so we could look to build under it.
Why can't we follow the league model? (i know that's a dicey comment in a rugby dominated forum). Rugby League runs all three levels at the same time, and they flow through each other. Why can't rugby? Why can't club, NPC and Super all happen at the same time? And have players flow through?That would mean that NPC is deprived of most of its Super Rugby players and local club rugby is deprived of most of its NPC players. That would kill local club rugby even more than all the departures to the MLR. Grassroots rugby in the smaller provinces would die. NPC would be seriously weakened.
It's a big 'no' from me.
-
Some good points raised here. There's a real negative attitude in rugby towards Super Rugby that I think is overdone - especially in the media.
Crusaders Chief Executive Colin Mansbridge, who especially hasn’t been afraid to call out journalists he believes are more down on the competition than is warranted. “I think that’s the point [it’s not all bad]. It can always be better, the competition is never going to be perfect,” he said. “I think the problem is that everyone has this very binary mindset. It’s either stuffed or it’s got to be brilliant, and there’s no in-between.” -
The thing that will probably kill.NZ rugby is that so many stakeholders can't see anything that isn't exactly everything they have now, no matter how out of date or disjointed
Based on my very real example I can assure you that club league is as strong as ever.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby 2023:
Some good points raised here. There's a real negative attitude in rugby towards Super Rugby that I think is overdone - especially in the media.
Crusaders Chief Executive Colin Mansbridge, who especially hasn’t been afraid to call out journalists he believes are more down on the competition than is warranted. “I think that’s the point [it’s not all bad]. It can always be better, the competition is never going to be perfect,” he said. “I think the problem is that everyone has this very binary mindset. It’s either stuffed or it’s got to be brilliant, and there’s no in-between.”Shit, I saw his tweets via a league forum, didn't realise he was CEO of the Crusaders.
@Kirwan said in Super Rugby 2023:
I think the loudest moaners in the press prefer League, so will never be happy
It's weird how much the NZ press loves league. That right wing alternative news thing with Plunket has a sports section that is almost entirely the Warriors.
-
As much as I would hate it, the best thing for thr comp is the Brumbies winning tonight
The fact it's very much a 50/50 game should be enough, but a tangible result will be even better.
Stay the fucking course
-
@mariner4life Brumbies loss last week is likely to cost them a home semi even if they win tonight
-
@KiwiMurph Australia should never have signed up. Terrible competition not worth saving.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby 2023:
@mariner4life Brumbies loss last week is likely to cost them a home semi even if they win tonight
It's not just the home final
They lost to an Aussie team one week, thrn best the top kiwi side the next week is a good signThe strongest NZ sides are still too good for most of the comp, but if they fuck around and rest players then they are in danger. A couple of years of continuity and it will get tighter I reckon.
-
@Kirwan said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Crucial said in Super Rugby 2023:
The link to Us/Japan markets comes from recruitment from those countries to help fill rosters. Totally up to the franchise how they want to position themselves, but it may make some sense for marketing if you picked a few overseas stars and played some pre season stuff somewhere else.
A comp wil a number of teams of a similar level to MP would not be high quality. US/Japan level players would be a level below MP IMO.
Below or at. The idea would be to re spread the NZ talent, keep Drua, add in some good players from Japan/US/Canada ( only good ones and they do exist) plus add in some from Europe.
We can usually make up a tem of decent players that miss out on Super each year as well.
Maybe 10 is too many to start with? Start at 8 or 9 with expansion plans.
Key would be that you start with a player auction type thing. Protect x number from areas, ask for free agent players and put those in a pool to bid for, allow marquee players as well -
@Derpus said in Super Rugby 2023:
@KiwiMurph Australia should never have signed up. Terrible competition not worth saving.
Fuck you are boring.
Edit:
Sorry - play the ball, not the man...
Fuck that post is boring.
Devoid of any content or insight, and still as vapid on the 50th attempt. -
Top 5 scenarios
- Chiefs (locked in)
- Crusaders unless they lose without a bonus to Canes AND Blues beat Highlanders with a bonus AND there's a 34 point swing
- Blues, unless the above scenario happens and they jump to 2nd. Brumbies would need a win against Rebels and a Blues loss OR Blues to win without a bonus and a huge win.
- Brumbies unless they lose to the Rebels AND the Canes beat the Saders.
- Canes, unless they beat Saders and Brumbies lose.
Odds are that the table wont change at this end.
Canes have most to gain if they could get to 4th and avoid a trip to Canberra.If that happens and all quarters are played in NZ expect Oz to tune out.
-
Yay, looking like the Canes over to Canberra for the second year in a row. FFS.
Hopefully we've learned something from last year but with Holland at the helm I doubt it.
-
@Crucial said in Super Rugby 2023:
Brumbies would need a huge (80 plus) win against Rebels and a Blues loss OR Blues to win without a bonus.
Brumbies are only a point behind the Blues
If the Blues lose and Brumbies win they swap positions. The huge win to change points diff only comes into to it if the Blues win without a bonus point
-
@Duluth said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Crucial said in Super Rugby 2023:
Brumbies would need a huge (80 plus) win against Rebels and a Blues loss OR Blues to win without a bonus.
Brumbies are only a point behind the Blues
If the Blues lose and Brumbies win they swap positions. The huge win to change points diff only comes into to it if the Blues win without a bonus point
Yep, got in a tangle there. Have corrected.
-
The race for the bottom: 7th and 8th (Tahs sit safely in 6th). So many permutations. There are 4 matches that will impact this and each match has 4 possible outcomes (more if looking at PD)
As one of Drua or Reds will pick up Points there is really only one spot being contestedHighlanders need to either win, or hope that all of Drua, Force and Rebels lose and that the Blues don't beat them by a much bigger margin than the Force lose by.
Rebels and Drua must win for a chance.
-
The Rebels could be eliminated by Friday night so the other teams will have a clearer picture of what they need to do to make the 8.
The Highlanders would also finish ahead of the Force if they end up on the same points (assuming the Blues don't thrash them).
In the event of two or more teams being equal on competition points for any position on either the Competition table, either during or at the end of the season, such position will be decided upon using the following steps until the tie is broken:
a) Most wins from all matches;
b) Highest aggregate points difference from all matches;
c) Most tries from all matches;
d) Highest aggregate difference of total tries for versus tries scored against from all matches;
e) Coin toss -
Anyone have any idea which seeded teams will be playing on which nights? I've looked at historical seedings at 1st seed isn't always on the Saturday night. My schools show is on Friday night next week and will be pissed if the Chiefs are on Friday night lmao, but I feel like it's likely if its v Drua.
-
-
@Stargazer right so might be a safe bet that the Chiefs are on Saturday considering they're at midnight our time and have to fly back from Perth?
Stuff
