India v Aus
-
@ACT-Crusader innings loss coming up
-
@Chris said in India v Aus:
@Rapido said in India v Aus:
I draw from this that it appears Andrew MacDonald has bugger all say in selection.
I think its more they didn't want to play 5 lefties so Head went, bad decision as Renshaw did nothing and will struggle we all know here if we bowl spin at Matt in certain areas he fails.
As soon as Matt comes out in club on come the spinners and he normally struggles especially to orthodox Offies.
Coach always has virtually no say in Selection mostly the Captain on tour.You'd think someone who was making decisions would have known this about Renshaw.
Head is going to play the 2nd test!
-
-
Looking forward to the brains trust now dropping Murphy for the second test
-
deadset this pitch bullshit in India is blatant unadulterated cheating.
yes, every country prepares decks that suit them. But take a fucking look at the pics of the pitch for the 2nd test. Grass in teh middle, but none at either end. it looks like a day 4 deck already. it's blatant cheating.
fuck them. I hope Australia beat them by an innings in England.
-
Aussie win the toss and will bat
India
1 Rohit Sharma (capt), 2 KL Rahul, 3 Cheteshwar Pujara, 4 Virat Kohli, 5 Shreyas Iyer, 6 Ravindra Jadeja, 7 Srikar Bharat (wk), 8 Axar Patel, 9 R Ashwin, 10 Mohammed Shami, 11 Mohammed Siraj
Australia
1 David Warner, 2 Usman Khawaja, 3 Marnus Labuschagne, 4 Steven Smith, 5 Travis Head, 6 Peter Handscomb, 7 Alex Carey (wk), 8 Pat Cummins (capt), 9 Todd Murphy, 10 Nathan Lyon, 11 Matthew Kuhnemann
-
Warner now has the lowest average of any opener to have batted at least 15 times in India
-
-
@antipodean said in India v Aus:
Warner now has the lowest average of any opener to have batted at least 15 times in India
And a hairline fracture in his arm and concussion
-
We have just seen an umpire review for a stumping where the Aussies also appeared to appeal for a caught behind which was turned down. Part of the review process was to look at the front view to see if there was an edge. In effect, the Aussies just got a free review for the edge. Unless there is something that has escaped me, I cannot see any reason why the front view is necessary for a stumping.
-
@Crazy-Horse said in India v Aus:
We have just seen an umpire review for a stumping where the Aussies also appeared to appeal for a caught behind which was turned down. Part of the review process was to look at the front view to see if there was an edge. In effect, the Aussies just got a free review for the edge. Unless there is something that has escaped me, I cannot see any reason why the front view is necessary for a stumping.
I agree that the front view is not required for a stumping.
I think it is one of those weird cricket things where you don't have to state what the appeal or review is for - the umpires just go through every option
-
@KiwiMurph said in India v Aus:
India in trouble here.
Lyon bowling brilliantly
And then their tail remembers how to bat. Hilarious.
-
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in India v Aus:
@NTA said in India v Aus:
6 down for -95 and suddenly they're going to take a first innings lead. FFS...
Spoke too soon on the innings lead
1 run.
