• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Law trials and changes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
542 Posts 59 Posters 39.2k Views
Law trials and changes
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #445

    I have a huge respect for Ross Tucker's views on safety aspects of the game. His opinion will be better supported by scientific evidence than what you'll read in the media.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #446

    @Stargazer sure good stuff there, I think I'm right in saying those trials are sternum, not waist? Waist is a completely different thing

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #447

    Very good read and insights into the thinking. Interesting that France have combated ball carriers charging head first by legislation against it but England have decided to “encourage “ change.
    I can’t see that working myself.
    Anyone know the NZ approach?

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Crucial on last edited by Stargazer
    #448

    @Crucial The NZ approach is only aimed at lowering the tackle height to below the sternum (first tackler). I don't see anything in their announcement about ball carriers.

    See my post above.

    I quite like the French approach, although they chose to lower tackle height to the waist, not sternum.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #449

    If lowering tackle height makes a difference, happy days... But I think officials need to be really tight on ball placement or throwing it off the ground.

    Good to see RFU looking at the ball carrier actions too, trying to keep them high and not dip into contact

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #450

    @Stargazer said in Law trials and changes:

    @Crucial The NZ approach is only aimed at lowering the tackle height to below the sternum (first tackler). I don't see anything in their announcement about ball carriers.

    See my post above.

    I quite like the French approach, although they chose to lower tackle height to the waist, not sternum.

    Some of this is semantics. The NZ approach is “below the sternum -aim at the puku” the others are “aim at the waist”
    I don’t see much difference.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by MiketheSnow
    #451

    Sensible discussion

    What's not been talked about / I haven't heard or seen anything is what are the stats for HIA, YC & RC in 7s rugby?

    If it's significantly less, then surely the RFU, World Rugby et al need to dissect this and determine where the biggest problem areas in the 15-man game are

    It will come down to coaching, and the belief from the coaches and buy-in from the players that there's more to gain than lose by tackling higher than the nipple

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #452

    @MiketheSnow said in Law trials and changes:

    Sensible discussion

    What's not been talked about / I haven't heard or seen anything is what are the stats for HIA, YC & RC in 7s rugby?

    If it's significantly less, then surely the RFU, World Rugby et al need to dissect this and determine where the biggest problem areas in the 15-man game are

    It will come down to coaching, and the belief from the coaches and buy-in from the players that there's more to gain than lose by tackling higher than the nipple

    For starters in 7s you don't get players flying into rucks. Apply the binding law with a stricter interpretation in 15s and that problem is left to complete idiots and becomes 'dangerous play'

    MiketheSnowM taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Crucial on last edited by MiketheSnow
    #453

    @Crucial said in Law trials and changes:

    @MiketheSnow said in Law trials and changes:

    Sensible discussion

    What's not been talked about / I haven't heard or seen anything is what are the stats for HIA, YC & RC in 7s rugby?

    If it's significantly less, then surely the RFU, World Rugby et al need to dissect this and determine where the biggest problem areas in the 15-man game are

    It will come down to coaching, and the belief from the coaches and buy-in from the players that there's more to gain than lose by tackling higher than the nipple

    For starters in 7s you don't get players flying into rucks. Apply the binding law with a stricter interpretation in 15s and that problem is left to complete idiots and becomes 'dangerous play'

    That's where I was going, but didn't want to lead the jury 😉

    Coaching

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #454

    @Crucial there are certainly some rules they are harder on and much more decisive in thier decision making that lends to a better product.

    Def think 15s could take some 'learnings' from 7s in the way thier rulings are.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #455

    Looks like the tackle height is going lower, not waist (stupid) but lower at pro level. Maybe the below the nipples idea? Be good for us fast paced off loading type teams, really

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/131081616/world-rugby-to-follow-rfu-in-lowering-tackle-height-across-all-elite-rugby

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Machpants on last edited by Dan54
    #456

    @Machpants I like you Mach think waist a bit too low, I do think NZR are about right with sternum. I am just sitting here watching a live game on tv Sale vs Bath from up north, and you know what I finding ineteresting? Most of the tackles (especially effective ones ) at thie level are actually at waist or below anyway. I know it's just one game etc and not saying anything is right or wrong but interesting anyway. Even pick and go the most effective tackles are around legs.
    I also have a real thought that perhaps one of the big problems is too much training with tackle bags? Bare with me, when I coached kids back in 70s and 80s and I thaught them to defend, we alawys taught kids to go into tackles waist or below, with eyes open and head to side. I used to actually start at walking pace, then trotting and built up speed. I have noticed the thing to do for defence training from kids to club level seems to be get someone hold tackle bags, and let players fly into them, I watched a lot of junior teams training since I was involved at senior level etc, and always amazed how all defensive training seemed to require bags, and noone actually being taught the proper technigue. Even at senior club level I think players rely on hitting a tackle bag etc and aren't training good techniques.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #457

    Sexton has also commented about waist tackling being more dangerous in terms of concussions also.

    Shall we just go to touch rugby? It's a contact sport, this is unavoidable when there is contact.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #458

    So Tucker suggests that it's not going to happen?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #459

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor Meldrew
    wrote on last edited by Victor Meldrew
    #460

    Have no problem with the authorities looking at making the game safer and understand they need to manage the balance between player safety and keeping the physicality of the game, but fark me, they're making a right pigs ear of the tackle height issue.

    And it can't be that bloody difficult to communicate what you are looking at, set out the options, trial them at several levels, publish the feedback, explain the decisions that have been made and then manage the roll-out out in a sensible manner. Oh, and a semblance of communications planning would be nice.

    Instead we have a pig-ear of a situation where confusion reigns, players at all levels are pissed off, serious students of the game (the Fern can take a bow) are scratching their heads and the rugby public are shaking their heads in disbelief.

    It's a total - and avoidable - omnishambles

    StargazerS Dan54D 3 Replies Last reply
    5
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #461

    @Victor-Meldrew Agree 100%.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by Dan54
    #462

    @Victor-Meldrew Agree, seems pisspoor comunication, but I wondering how much we have looked at it, isn't it RU doing it in England and they seemed to stuffed up communicating with their clubs, they don't need to communicate it to me here in NZ!
    Actually was just talking to Welsh mate and he was saying the laws are also going to cover players bending so low so they can't be tackled legally, buggered if I know how.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #463

    @Dan54 said in Law trials and changes:

    @Victor-Meldrew Agree, seems pisspoor comunication, but I wondering how much we have looked at it, isn't it RU doing it in England and they seemed to stuffed up communicating with their clubs, they don't need to communicate it to me here in NZ!
    Actually was just talking to Welsh mate and he was saying the laws are also going to cover players bending so low so they can't be tackled legally, buggered if I know how.

    Have a read back in the thread. Covered in a good article. The law makers think it won’t be a problem just like you can grab near the head and shoulders near the line because it isn’t deemed dangerous unless you neck roll.
    After a few times getting your face slammed into the ground and people landing on you it won’t be that attractive an option.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #464

    @Victor-Meldrew Mate just out of interest on trialling and feedback etc, not sure if you saw this from NZR in November, and not sure where you reside mate, but we in NZ have been kept informed about this change quite well I thought.

    Reduced tackle height the focus of community rugby game innovations for 2023

    Reduced tackle height the focus of community rugby game innovations for 2023
    HigginsH Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
    2

Law trials and changes
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.