Royal drama
-
@Bones said in Royal drama:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Royal drama:
@canefan said in Royal drama:
If they really want to make a point, give all the money to charity.
I don't even have a problem with their making money about their experience as Royals. It's the way they're behaving like angry, childish divorcees with no care for the hurt they are causing which gets me.
Or does it.
How come his paedo brother doesn’t get mentioned when it comes to “drama”?
-
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@Bones said in Royal drama:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Royal drama:
@canefan said in Royal drama:
If they really want to make a point, give all the money to charity.
I don't even have a problem with their making money about their experience as Royals. It's the way they're behaving like angry, childish divorcees with no care for the hurt they are causing which gets me.
Or does it.
How come his paedo brother doesn’t get mentioned when it comes to “drama”?
Harry and Meghan are Andy's shield
-
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@Bones said in Royal drama:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Royal drama:
@canefan said in Royal drama:
If they really want to make a point, give all the money to charity.
I don't even have a problem with their making money about their experience as Royals. It's the way they're behaving like angry, childish divorcees with no care for the hurt they are causing which gets me.
Or does it.
How come his paedo brother doesn’t get mentioned when it comes to “drama”?
Nothing stopping you.
-
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@Bones said in Royal drama:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Royal drama:
@canefan said in Royal drama:
If they really want to make a point, give all the money to charity.
I don't even have a problem with their making money about their experience as Royals. It's the way they're behaving like angry, childish divorcees with no care for the hurt they are causing which gets me.
Or does it.
How come his paedo brother doesn’t get mentioned when it comes to “drama”?
Because that situation has been dealt with, perhaps?
Harry is really coming across like a complete bitch. And yes, clearly royal inbreeding has had a strong part to play on his intelligence.
-
@Bones said in Royal drama:
I've been avoiding this BS, but jeez, he's now starting to come across like some insecure ex-squaddie who drunkenly claims he was in the SAS.
God knows what's wrong with the bloke. He seems to have a huge chip on his shoulder about everything, he's always the victim, it's always everyone else's fault and his own actions have nothing to do with anything. I actually feel sorry for the bloke - he really needs help.
-
-
@Victor-Meldrew it's impossible to avoid it in the news, so I've seen the bit where this tough guy claims to have been absolutely dominated by musclebound Will and a dog bowl, then Kate dressed him in a nazi uniform and sent him out side.
-
@MajorRage said in Royal drama:
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@Bones said in Royal drama:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Royal drama:
@canefan said in Royal drama:
If they really want to make a point, give all the money to charity.
I don't even have a problem with their making money about their experience as Royals. It's the way they're behaving like angry, childish divorcees with no care for the hurt they are causing which gets me.
Or does it.
How come his paedo brother doesn’t get mentioned when it comes to “drama”?
Because that situation has been dealt with, perhaps?
Harry is really coming across like a complete bitch. And yes, clearly royal inbreeding has had a strong part to play on his intelligence.
Fair enough. I don’t follow this stuff as closely as others but I always found it strange that they seemed more villainous than a paedo in the eyes of the British press.
So Harry killed 25 enemies in battle but was “terrified” of a scrap with his bro ? Something doesn’t add up there.
-
-
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@MajorRage said in Royal drama:
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@Bones said in Royal drama:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Royal drama:
@canefan said in Royal drama:
If they really want to make a point, give all the money to charity.
I don't even have a problem with their making money about their experience as Royals. It's the way they're behaving like angry, childish divorcees with no care for the hurt they are causing which gets me.
Or does it.
How come his paedo brother doesn’t get mentioned when it comes to “drama”?
Because that situation has been dealt with, perhaps?
Harry is really coming across like a complete bitch. And yes, clearly royal inbreeding has had a strong part to play on his intelligence.
Fair enough. I don’t follow this stuff as closely as others but I always found it strange that they seemed more villainous than a paedo in the eyes of the British press.
So Harry killed 25 enemies in battle but was “terrified” of a scrap with his bro ? Something doesn’t add up there.
I'm also far from convinced the peado situation was "dealt with" to a satisfactory level. Seems odd that a couple of narcissists generate so much more coverage than actual disgusting criminals, but that seems to be the society we live in these days.
-
@No-Quarter said in Royal drama:
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@MajorRage said in Royal drama:
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@Bones said in Royal drama:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Royal drama:
@canefan said in Royal drama:
If they really want to make a point, give all the money to charity.
I don't even have a problem with their making money about their experience as Royals. It's the way they're behaving like angry, childish divorcees with no care for the hurt they are causing which gets me.
Or does it.
How come his paedo brother doesn’t get mentioned when it comes to “drama”?
Because that situation has been dealt with, perhaps?
Harry is really coming across like a complete bitch. And yes, clearly royal inbreeding has had a strong part to play on his intelligence.
Fair enough. I don’t follow this stuff as closely as others but I always found it strange that they seemed more villainous than a paedo in the eyes of the British press.
So Harry killed 25 enemies in battle but was “terrified” of a scrap with his bro ? Something doesn’t add up there.
I'm also far from convinced the peado situation was "dealt with" to a satisfactory level. Seems odd that a couple of narcissists generate so much more coverage than actual disgusting criminals, but that seems to be the society we live in these days.
Yes a sad but true state of affairs my friend.
The gist I get is that they’re far more reviled than uncle Andy.
-
@No-Quarter said in Royal drama:
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@MajorRage said in Royal drama:
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@Bones said in Royal drama:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Royal drama:
@canefan said in Royal drama:
If they really want to make a point, give all the money to charity.
I don't even have a problem with their making money about their experience as Royals. It's the way they're behaving like angry, childish divorcees with no care for the hurt they are causing which gets me.
Or does it.
How come his paedo brother doesn’t get mentioned when it comes to “drama”?
Because that situation has been dealt with, perhaps?
Harry is really coming across like a complete bitch. And yes, clearly royal inbreeding has had a strong part to play on his intelligence.
Fair enough. I don’t follow this stuff as closely as others but I always found it strange that they seemed more villainous than a paedo in the eyes of the British press.
So Harry killed 25 enemies in battle but was “terrified” of a scrap with his bro ? Something doesn’t add up there.
I'm also far from convinced the peado situation was "dealt with" to a satisfactory level. Seems odd that a couple of narcissists generate so much more coverage than actual disgusting criminals, but that seems to be the society we live in these days.
From what I read, she was 17 when he is alleged to have had sex with her in London, where the age of consent is 16.
-
@antipodean said in Royal drama:
@No-Quarter said in Royal drama:
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@MajorRage said in Royal drama:
@MN5 said in Royal drama:
@Bones said in Royal drama:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Royal drama:
@canefan said in Royal drama:
If they really want to make a point, give all the money to charity.
I don't even have a problem with their making money about their experience as Royals. It's the way they're behaving like angry, childish divorcees with no care for the hurt they are causing which gets me.
Or does it.
How come his paedo brother doesn’t get mentioned when it comes to “drama”?
Because that situation has been dealt with, perhaps?
Harry is really coming across like a complete bitch. And yes, clearly royal inbreeding has had a strong part to play on his intelligence.
Fair enough. I don’t follow this stuff as closely as others but I always found it strange that they seemed more villainous than a paedo in the eyes of the British press.
So Harry killed 25 enemies in battle but was “terrified” of a scrap with his bro ? Something doesn’t add up there.
I'm also far from convinced the peado situation was "dealt with" to a satisfactory level. Seems odd that a couple of narcissists generate so much more coverage than actual disgusting criminals, but that seems to be the society we live in these days.
From what I read, she was 17 when he is alleged to have had sex with her in London, where the age of consent is 16.
I'm more referring to all the people, including Andrew, that were regulars to Epstein's island, where it was an open secret among elites and celebrities that he was trafficking girls, many underage, to that same island. But I guess that's all been dealt with now, Epstein's dead and Maxwell somehow got charged despite having no known customers.
-
I've no doubt if she was 15 or younger, the outcry would be magnified considerably, and rightly so.