• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Kane Williamson and Tim Southee

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
42 Posts 15 Posters 1.4k Views
Kane Williamson and Tim Southee
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #29

    Changing the subject ( in a thread I started so it’s ok )

    Can anyone tell me about Blair Tickner and try and justify why he’s in the team ?

    He screams “journeyman” more than John Mitchell in his days as AB coach telling us we’re going on a “journey”

    From the glory days of the mid 2010s I’m really feeling we’re getting that inevitable decline ( a far cry from the Windies or Sri Lanka thankfully ) where guys get selected on the back of some pretty ordinary first class numbers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    delicatessen
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    Maybe I'm dreaming, but it looks slightly to me like they're aiming at a more aggressive approach to tests. I can see the temptation with the Bazball success thus far, but I can't see it working if they half-arse it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #31

    @MN5 said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @nzzp said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @MN5 said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    But Oz themselves have a tradition of fantastic batsmen as captains

    spot on - their best batsman is inevitably the captain. Paine and then Cummins are the first to really break that for decades I think

    Was Tubby the best ? Probably not. Can’t argue with the rest though.

    Let’s not forget that Taylor burst on the scene with a flurry of runs - 6 hundreds including a double ton, plus 8 half centuries after a dozen or so tests. He was pretty consistent thereafter but then probably got the captains curse and his batting somewhat suffered. Got some injuries as well if I recall because I remember Waugh captaining on a couple of tours before Taylor eventually retired.

    But I always thought that Taylor would be the natural successor of Border.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    Also, 22 wins in 40 tests with 10 draws is absolutely phenomenal, what a golden age for NZ test cricket. Then you add the test championship on top of that and he's easily our GOAT captain.

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #34

    @No-Quarter said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    Also, 22 wins in 40 tests with 10 draws is absolutely phenomenal, what a golden age for NZ test cricket. Then you add the test championship on top of that and he's easily our GOAT captain.

    I don't think he is a great captain. Not a poor one by any stretch, but in my lifetime I reckon we have had better.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #35

    @Crazy-Horse said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @No-Quarter said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    Also, 22 wins in 40 tests with 10 draws is absolutely phenomenal, what a golden age for NZ test cricket. Then you add the test championship on top of that and he's easily our GOAT captain.

    I don't think he is a great captain. Not a poor one by any stretch, but in my lifetime I reckon we have had better.

    He is quite a passive captain, whereas Baz was bolder. But Kane is a far superior batsman, especially at test level

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #36

    @canefan said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @No-Quarter said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    Also, 22 wins in 40 tests with 10 draws is absolutely phenomenal, what a golden age for NZ test cricket. Then you add the test championship on top of that and he's easily our GOAT captain.

    I don't think he is a great captain. Not a poor one by any stretch, but in my lifetime I reckon we have had better.

    He is quite a passive captain, whereas Baz was bolder. But Kane is a far superior batsman, especially at test level

    Definitely the better bat, no argument there.

    canefanC MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #37

    @Crazy-Horse said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @canefan said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @No-Quarter said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    Also, 22 wins in 40 tests with 10 draws is absolutely phenomenal, what a golden age for NZ test cricket. Then you add the test championship on top of that and he's easily our GOAT captain.

    I don't think he is a great captain. Not a poor one by any stretch, but in my lifetime I reckon we have had better.

    He is quite a passive captain, whereas Baz was bolder. But Kane is a far superior batsman, especially at test level

    Definitely the better bat, no argument there.

    The team we had in the year leading up to the WTC win was probably the best we've ever had. He made good solid decisions as well but the team was stacked. Contrast some of his decisions in the recent Oz T20 series and the T20 WC, maybe it's just that T20 isn't his strong suit

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #38

    @Crazy-Horse said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @canefan said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @No-Quarter said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    Also, 22 wins in 40 tests with 10 draws is absolutely phenomenal, what a golden age for NZ test cricket. Then you add the test championship on top of that and he's easily our GOAT captain.

    I don't think he is a great captain. Not a poor one by any stretch, but in my lifetime I reckon we have had better.

    He is quite a passive captain, whereas Baz was bolder. But Kane is a far superior batsman, especially at test level

    Definitely the better bat, no argument there.

    Night and day.

    I appreciated McCullum when he was on but he had a shitload of troughs in his career too.

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #39

    @canefan said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @canefan said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @No-Quarter said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    Also, 22 wins in 40 tests with 10 draws is absolutely phenomenal, what a golden age for NZ test cricket. Then you add the test championship on top of that and he's easily our GOAT captain.

    I don't think he is a great captain. Not a poor one by any stretch, but in my lifetime I reckon we have had better.

    He is quite a passive captain, whereas Baz was bolder. But Kane is a far superior batsman, especially at test level

    Definitely the better bat, no argument there.

    The team we had in the year leading up to the WTC win was probably the best we've ever had. He made good solid decisions as well but the team was stacked. Contrast some of his decisions in the recent Oz T20 series and the T20 WC, maybe it's just that T20 isn't his strong suit

    No probables, definitely.

    Most of them are firmly in the discussion for best test XI of all time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #40

    @MN5 said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @canefan said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    @No-Quarter said in Kane Williamson and Tim Southee:

    Also, 22 wins in 40 tests with 10 draws is absolutely phenomenal, what a golden age for NZ test cricket. Then you add the test championship on top of that and he's easily our GOAT captain.

    I don't think he is a great captain. Not a poor one by any stretch, but in my lifetime I reckon we have had better.

    He is quite a passive captain, whereas Baz was bolder. But Kane is a far superior batsman, especially at test level

    Definitely the better bat, no argument there.

    Night and day.

    I appreciated McCullum when he was on but he had a shitload of troughs in his career too.

    absolutely, there was a period though when Baz was captain and Kane was scoring well which was my favourite combo. Even the fielders were rushing in and the whole whole team was positive. Obviously we also had Boult and Southee playing their part too..but that was my favourite era. We had dropped the sledging but played hard.

    Kane kept that energy up for a little bit and now it has reverted to defensive test cricket approach. Hopefully Kane puts on some massive innings to help whoever is captain as I hate saying anything negative about the bloke..he is still a legend and would always like to think of him that way.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    I dunno, I think Kane was the right captain for our team. The 'Bazball' approach is great for punching above your weight at times, but carries a large amount of risk which we didn't need to take given we had world class players throughout our 11. I'm not sure we would have made the test championship final by throwing caution to the wind all the time, we were extremely consistent during that period which got us through to the final and I think our tactics were spot on for that whole period.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    One of our biggest problems of late is that Kane hasn't played much test cricket, and our standards and consistency across the whole team notably dropped away, leading to that loss against the bloody Bangles at home.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Kane Williamson and Tim Southee
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.