• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
381 Posts 29 Posters 16.3k Views
Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #152

    The issue last night was, every bowler who wasn't Boult looked a bit shit. Satnav was completely unthreatening. Carey and Green looked comfortable very quickly. There were a couple of inside edges for 4, but other than that, they looked happy, and found gaps far more easy than the guys in black did.

    That's a disappointing loss in the end. Score felt 20 short, but even then, at 5/44 we should have made more of it than that.

    Happy i left about 8.45

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Canerbry on last edited by
    #153

    @Canerbry said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    massage therapy delays were a novel and creative display of classic Australian sportsmanship,

    The inability to capitalise on 5 down for fuck all neatly demonstrated classic Slack Crap ability.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #154

    @NTA said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @Canerbry said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    massage therapy delays were a novel and creative display of classic Australian sportsmanship,

    The inability to capitalise on 5 down for fuck all neatly demonstrated classic Slack Crap ability.

    We do have a freakish habit of completely crumbling against Australia fore whatever reason you’re quite right.

    These days are long gone.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #155

    @mariner4life said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    The issue last night was, every bowler who wasn't Boult looked a bit shit. Satnav was completely unthreatening. Carey and Green looked comfortable very quickly. There were a couple of inside edges for 4, but other than that, they looked happy, and found gaps far more easy than the guys in black did.

    That's a disappointing loss in the end. Score felt 20 short, but even then, at 5/44 we should have made more of it than that.

    Happy i left about 8.45

    Henry was okay too. We should have pushed all in with Boult and Henry while the ball was still moving and tried to knock them all over

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #156

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    This is the worst commentary team in the history of broadcast cricket - Howie, Haddin, Waugh, Ian Smith.

    I don’t mind Skull and Brendan Jillian is okay. But those other four clowns 🤮

    Yeah - for an Australian commentary team they were terrible.

    Terrible captaincy by Little Kane. If ever there was a time to put your eggs in the wicket-taking basket it was at 5/40.

    Now, sure....he may have thought his second-line bowlers only have to get him one wicket, but when they didn't for fucks sake, get back to the frontline bowlers ASAP while the ball is still doing something. I simply can't see how saving Boult for later was a good plan.

    BMac as captain wins that game by 100 runs!!!

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #157

    @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    Yeah - for an Australian commentary team they were terrible.

    I turned them onto mute. Honestly.

    Weirdly the SENZ radio cmomentary was about 10-15 seconds behind teh digital. Again, weird

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #158

    @Chris-B yeah, I tuned in late so figured he'd bowled 7 already so they were saving him, but Aus effectively won the game while Boult had only bowled 5 overs! Frustrating to watch, you'd expect better from Kane

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #159

    @No-Quarter said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    you'd expect better from Kane

    We’ve been saying that a fair bit in recent times.

    It’s as if Kane bought Santner on when OZ were on the ropes to try and get through some overs. Santner got exposed at the end big time.

    The shame is that Ferg took a bit to get going too. I would’ve given a few more overs to Neesh.

    canefanC Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by canefan
    #160

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @No-Quarter said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    you'd expect better from Kane

    We’ve been saying that a fair bit in recent times.

    It’s as if Kane bought Santner on when OZ were on the ropes to try and get through some overs. Santner got exposed at the end big time.

    The shame is that Ferg took a bit to get going too. I would’ve given a few more overs to Neesh.

    That was never on. Our score was so low the only way we were going to win was to bowl them out. Kane and Stead's faith in Bracewell and Santner is exasperating.
    We should have pushed all in and tried to knock them out

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #161

    @canefan said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @No-Quarter said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    you'd expect better from Kane

    We’ve been saying that a fair bit in recent times.

    It’s as if Kane bought Santner on when OZ were on the ropes to try and get through some overs. Santner got exposed at the end big time.

    The shame is that Ferg took a bit to get going too. I would’ve given a few more overs to Neesh.

    That was never on. Our score was so low the only way we were going to win was to bowl them out. Kane and Stead's faith in Bracewell and Santner is exasperating.
    We should have pushed all in and tried to knock them out

    Unfortunately with Kane as captain and Stead as coach that was never going to happen. They simply aren't built to be that attacking.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #162

    @KiwiMurph said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @canefan said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @No-Quarter said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    you'd expect better from Kane

    We’ve been saying that a fair bit in recent times.

    It’s as if Kane bought Santner on when OZ were on the ropes to try and get through some overs. Santner got exposed at the end big time.

    The shame is that Ferg took a bit to get going too. I would’ve given a few more overs to Neesh.

    That was never on. Our score was so low the only way we were going to win was to bowl them out. Kane and Stead's faith in Bracewell and Santner is exasperating.
    We should have pushed all in and tried to knock them out

    Unfortunately with Kane as captain and Stead as coach that was never going to happen. They simply aren't built to be that attacking.

    What I'd give for bazball....

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #163

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @No-Quarter said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    you'd expect better from Kane

    We’ve been saying that a fair bit in recent times.

    It’s as if Kane bought Santner on when OZ were on the ropes to try and get through some overs. Santner got exposed at the end big time.

    The shame is that Ferg took a bit to get going too. I would’ve given a few more overs to Neesh.

    There was very little logic to it.

    If Oz were to win, Carey, Green and Maxwell were going to have to do most of the work - we could either bowl our guns at them when they weren't set and conditions were helpful - or hold them in reserve in case they got set and the ball got old.

    Waaay dumber than Cane and Fozzie have managed.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #164

    I still don't know why Guptill, Santner and Bracewell are in the team. At least the first two have been heroes in black in the past. But they hurt us at least as much as they help. And Bracewell is just bizarre. An old journeyman who seems to be teacher's pet right now

    DonsteppaD MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #165

    @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    Waaay dumber than Cane and Fozzie have managed.

    What, like leaving Boult out of the XI to play Chris Martin?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #166

    @canefan said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    I still don't know why Guptill, Santner and Bracewell are in the team. At least the first two have been heroes in black in the past. But they hurt us at least as much as they help. And Bracewell is just bizarre. An old journeyman who seems to be teacher's pet right now

    Yes it was Ireland. But nobody else did any good...

    Capture.JPG

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #167

    @Donsteppa said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @canefan said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    I still don't know why Guptill, Santner and Bracewell are in the team. At least the first two have been heroes in black in the past. But they hurt us at least as much as they help. And Bracewell is just bizarre. An old journeyman who seems to be teacher's pet right now

    Yes it was Ireland. But nobody else did any good...

    Capture.JPG

    This

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #168
    Stuff

    Trent doesn't talk with Kane?

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #169

    @canefan said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    Stuff

    Trent doesn't talk with Kane?

    Probably doesn't now.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by canefan
    #170

    @Crucial said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @canefan said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    Stuff

    Trent doesn't talk with Kane?

    Probably doesn't now.

    We've hit our high water mark and it's all downhill from here

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #171

    @canefan said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    We've hit our high water mark and it's all downhill from here

    Yes, but that high water mark was glorious while it lasted.

    ![e8f00399-9034-4666-8bfa-c422ee22b8b1-image.png](Request Entity Too Large) 761b5591-186f-4608-b74d-4cd936d20670-image.png

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.