• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
381 Posts 29 Posters 16.3k Views
Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Plenty of players getting starts but none can kick on

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Aw come on you miserable bastards. Last start we lost to the Zimbots ffs!

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #24

    @NTA said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    Aw come on you miserable bastards. Last start we lost to the Zimbots ffs!

    what's the odds on an Aussie loss from here? Battle hardened and already shat their pants ths week ...it's not going to happen with Santner bowling is it

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    We are cooked

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    pitch that hard to get a start on? or are we underperforming as the comments suggest?

    canefanC Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to bayimports on last edited by canefan
    #27

    @bayimports said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    pitch that hard to get a start on? or are we underperforming as the comments suggest?

    We're gonna find out in a little bit. Comms reckon the pitch is slow as

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to bayimports on last edited by
    #28

    @bayimports said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    pitch that hard to get a start on? or are we underperforming as the comments suggest?

    We don't seem to have been very urgent.

    I reckon we're 30 short of par.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #29

    @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @bayimports said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    pitch that hard to get a start on? or are we underperforming as the comments suggest?

    We don't seem to have been very urgent.

    I reckon we're 30 short of par.

    Guppie scratching around for a bunch of balls then getting out didn't help

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #30

    @canefan We also seemed to get to a position to ice the cake - and then no-one did. Instead we faltered.

    No-one managed to get the half-dozen big shots away that give you the necessary acceleration.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #31

    @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @canefan We also seemed to get to a position to ice the cake - and then no-one did. Instead we faltered.

    No-one managed to get the half-dozen big shots away that give you the necessary acceleration.

    I only watched the first half of the innings. Everyone got starts. But we just lost wickets regularly and couldn't lift the run rate as a result. Frustrating

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    Oh no, Henry opens with Boult

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    Finch gone. But they bat down to about 8 so a long way to go

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    Plumb as, Finchie.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #35

    @canefan said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    Oh no, Henry opens with Boult

    I love pies

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #36

    @MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @canefan said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    Oh no, Henry opens with Boult

    I love pies

    So does Davey dumb dumb

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #37

    Yessss. Boult gets Smith

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Nice!

    Smith drags one on.

    We're in the game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Boult is bowling well.

    Surprisingly keen on bowling at the pads - but the ball is doing a bit (so far) and it really could get LBW

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #40

    Back to the days of the World XI at one end and the the Ilford 2nds at the other.

    And also now for Australia with the bat...

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Warner is the danger man. He's thriving on a diet of pie right now

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.