Final: Blues vs Crusaders
-
@No-Quarter said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Crucial said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@KiwiMurph said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny
Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around thisMounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.
BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.
It's so much easier to kick well tactically when you get forwards handing it to you on a silver platter. And not under any real pressure. So I disagree
Beaudy is not a particularly good punter though. He never has been.
His whole kicking game from hand (apart from the odd kick pass) is terrible. He hasn’t improved much over time either. His touch finders last night were rubbish. Gaining bout 20m max. Arrogance to not hand the kicking to Perofeta.
I don't remember many touchfinders from Beauden at all last night, most of the poor kicking came from Christie box kicking it into touch for about a 5m gain.
My biggest criticism of Beauden last night was that he didn't demand the ball from Christie when it was clear Christie was having a shocker. If DC had a 9 inside him playing like that he would have demanded the ball every time so that he could make the decisions instead - that's what we really lack from both our 10s right now, when shit is hitting the fan neither of them take control of the situation.
BB is a shocking captain was my take. They needed someone to pull the heads around from being 'deer in the headlights' and re-focus
-
As much as any team doesn't want to rely on one player, the Blues are a different side without Dalton, last week they were exposed, and maybe that started sowing the seeds of doubt, when he came on, it was too late, but you could see the lift in the team.
-
@Crucial said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@No-Quarter said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Crucial said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@KiwiMurph said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny
Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around thisMounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.
BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.
It's so much easier to kick well tactically when you get forwards handing it to you on a silver platter. And not under any real pressure. So I disagree
Beaudy is not a particularly good punter though. He never has been.
His whole kicking game from hand (apart from the odd kick pass) is terrible. He hasn’t improved much over time either. His touch finders last night were rubbish. Gaining bout 20m max. Arrogance to not hand the kicking to Perofeta.
I don't remember many touchfinders from Beauden at all last night, most of the poor kicking came from Christie box kicking it into touch for about a 5m gain.
My biggest criticism of Beauden last night was that he didn't demand the ball from Christie when it was clear Christie was having a shocker. If DC had a 9 inside him playing like that he would have demanded the ball every time so that he could make the decisions instead - that's what we really lack from both our 10s right now, when shit is hitting the fan neither of them take control of the situation.
BB is a shocking captain was my take. They needed someone to pull the heads around from being 'deer in the headlights' and re-focus
Probably why a back shouldn't be captain, as it was the lineout that desperately needed fixing which is not Beaudens area at all.
-
@No-Quarter said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Crucial said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@No-Quarter said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Crucial said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@KiwiMurph said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny
Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around thisMounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.
BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.
It's so much easier to kick well tactically when you get forwards handing it to you on a silver platter. And not under any real pressure. So I disagree
Beaudy is not a particularly good punter though. He never has been.
His whole kicking game from hand (apart from the odd kick pass) is terrible. He hasn’t improved much over time either. His touch finders last night were rubbish. Gaining bout 20m max. Arrogance to not hand the kicking to Perofeta.
I don't remember many touchfinders from Beauden at all last night, most of the poor kicking came from Christie box kicking it into touch for about a 5m gain.
My biggest criticism of Beauden last night was that he didn't demand the ball from Christie when it was clear Christie was having a shocker. If DC had a 9 inside him playing like that he would have demanded the ball every time so that he could make the decisions instead - that's what we really lack from both our 10s right now, when shit is hitting the fan neither of them take control of the situation.
BB is a shocking captain was my take. They needed someone to pull the heads around from being 'deer in the headlights' and re-focus
Probably why a back shouldn't be captain, as it was the lineout that desperately needed fixing which is not Beaudens area at all.
I don’t mean technically I mean mentally.
-
Blues defence was very good. They scramble well and hit low. That was expected given the two best defensive teams in the comp played last night.
What surprised me was the way the Blues attacked. Their ball runners didn’t draw in enough red shirts and I thought they died with the ball too easily. The Saders fanned very quickly setting up the wall. Conditions were tough but a short passing or even offload game would’ve created a few more problems for our defence. This was particularly noticeable in the second half where the Blues had a lot more possession and territory than the first.
-
The conditions nullified the Blues attacking potency; quick stepping and fleet footed. What cost the Blues was a lack of territory and possession due to the lineout.
Quite frankly I'm surprised they were in the fight on the scoreboard for so long, which says a lot about the attacking potency of the Crusaders and the Blues defence.
-
@taniwharugby said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Jailbreak7 thing was, the Crusaders denied the blues any opportunity to show thier game plan.
It started with the lineout, Whitelock owned it, psyched out Eklund and the blues jumpers, allowing total domination, then everything flowed on from there.
It was a masterclass from the senior players in the saders and Razor, hopefully will give Fozzie some ideas cos the Blues looked overawed like the ABS were at times last year.
I thought the starting point was the rain.
My biggest concern was the Blues speed through the midfield - Ioane and Barrett aided by RTS and Perofeta. The rain shut down opportunities for slick handling to put these guys in any space and the smothering defence took care of the rest.
The lineout starving the Blues of possession and territory obviously a serious factor.
For us pretty much everyone played well or very well - I thought probably one exception who shall remain nameless.
Some of the wet weather handling was phenomenal, but even then we struggled getting the ball wide regularlyInteresting to hear Sam Whitelock giving the credit for the defensive lineout tactics to Strange and Grace.
You have to wonder whether Fozzie might have reconsidered his front row selections if he was picking his team tomorrow.
-
@taniwharugby said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
As much as any team doesn't want to rely on one player, the Blues are a different side without Dalton, last week they were exposed, and maybe that started sowing the seeds of doubt, when he came on, it was too late, but you could see the lift in the team.
From an ABs perspective looking forward it was great to see Papali'i make an impact from the bench given that's where he's gonna be (unless they run him at 6), especially factoring in he can't have been 100%.
-
@Chris-B said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
You have to wonder whether Fozzie might have reconsidered his front row selections if he was picking his team tomorrow.
That involves a) learning and b) admiting you got it wrong. Considering nothing of the sort was mentioned (for example) post lost to Arg, or just blame last year on the long season, I think there would be little change
-
@Chris-B said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Jailbreak7 thing was, the Crusaders denied the blues any opportunity to show thier game plan.
It started with the lineout, Whitelock owned it, psyched out Eklund and the blues jumpers, allowing total domination, then everything flowed on from there.
It was a masterclass from the senior players in the saders and Razor, hopefully will give Fozzie some ideas cos the Blues looked overawed like the ABS were at times last year.
I thought the starting point was the rain.
My biggest concern was the Blues speed through the midfield - Ioane and Barrett aided by RTS and Perofeta. The rain shut down opportunities for slick handling to put these guys in any space and the smothering defence took care of the rest.
The lineout starving the Blues of possession and territory obviously a serious factor.
For us pretty much everyone played well or very well - I thought probably one exception who shall remain nameless.
Some of the wet weather handling was phenomenal, but even then we struggled getting the ball wide regularlyInteresting to hear Sam Whitelock giving the credit for the defensive lineout tactics to Strange and Grace.
You have to wonder whether Fozzie might have reconsidered his front row selections if he was picking his team tomorrow.
Pretty fair, and I sort of alluded to that as well. In dryer weather, our backs could build pressure to respond to any issues in the forwards. The last two games have blunted that with poor weather and needed to rely more on set piece.
An area to improve, and we’ve been seeing incremental improvements each year. Blues are still a good team, Crusaders were better on the night, and in those conditions.
Of course it bloody blue skys and lovely today. FFS.
-
@Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Chris-B said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
You have to wonder whether Fozzie might have reconsidered his front row selections if he was picking his team tomorrow.
That involves a) learning and b) admiting you got it wrong. Considering nothing of the sort was mentioned (for example) post lost to Arg, or just blame last year on the long season, I think there would be little change
To be fair - he's dropped Lomax and De Groot from last year's propping group.
We'll have to wait till the next waypoint - selecting the team for the Rugby championship - to see whether he's going to reconsider.
-
-
@Nepia said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Kirwan said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
Blues are still a good team
This is the key, although reading back through this thread you'd think this was the worst Blues side to ever lace up their boots.
A few posters were saving up their gripes from getting their asses handed to them from the Blues.
-
@Kirwan said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Chris-B said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Jailbreak7 thing was, the Crusaders denied the blues any opportunity to show thier game plan.
It started with the lineout, Whitelock owned it, psyched out Eklund and the blues jumpers, allowing total domination, then everything flowed on from there.
It was a masterclass from the senior players in the saders and Razor, hopefully will give Fozzie some ideas cos the Blues looked overawed like the ABS were at times last year.
I thought the starting point was the rain.
My biggest concern was the Blues speed through the midfield - Ioane and Barrett aided by RTS and Perofeta. The rain shut down opportunities for slick handling to put these guys in any space and the smothering defence took care of the rest.
The lineout starving the Blues of possession and territory obviously a serious factor.
For us pretty much everyone played well or very well - I thought probably one exception who shall remain nameless.
Some of the wet weather handling was phenomenal, but even then we struggled getting the ball wide regularlyInteresting to hear Sam Whitelock giving the credit for the defensive lineout tactics to Strange and Grace.
You have to wonder whether Fozzie might have reconsidered his front row selections if he was picking his team tomorrow.
Pretty fair, and I sort of alluded to that as well. In dryer weather, our backs could build pressure to respond to any issues in the forwards. The last two games have blunted that with poor weather and needed to rely more on set piece.
An area to improve, and we’ve been seeing incremental improvements each year. Blues are still a good team, Crusaders were better on the night, and in those conditions.
Of course it bloody blue skys and lovely today. FFS.
Can you blame the weather though? Crusaders backs still seemed to be able to run and pass well in the same conditions
-
@Nevorian said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Kirwan said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Chris-B said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Jailbreak7 thing was, the Crusaders denied the blues any opportunity to show thier game plan.
It started with the lineout, Whitelock owned it, psyched out Eklund and the blues jumpers, allowing total domination, then everything flowed on from there.
It was a masterclass from the senior players in the saders and Razor, hopefully will give Fozzie some ideas cos the Blues looked overawed like the ABS were at times last year.
I thought the starting point was the rain.
My biggest concern was the Blues speed through the midfield - Ioane and Barrett aided by RTS and Perofeta. The rain shut down opportunities for slick handling to put these guys in any space and the smothering defence took care of the rest.
The lineout starving the Blues of possession and territory obviously a serious factor.
For us pretty much everyone played well or very well - I thought probably one exception who shall remain nameless.
Some of the wet weather handling was phenomenal, but even then we struggled getting the ball wide regularlyInteresting to hear Sam Whitelock giving the credit for the defensive lineout tactics to Strange and Grace.
You have to wonder whether Fozzie might have reconsidered his front row selections if he was picking his team tomorrow.
Pretty fair, and I sort of alluded to that as well. In dryer weather, our backs could build pressure to respond to any issues in the forwards. The last two games have blunted that with poor weather and needed to rely more on set piece.
An area to improve, and we’ve been seeing incremental improvements each year. Blues are still a good team, Crusaders were better on the night, and in those conditions.
Of course it bloody blue skys and lovely today. FFS.
Can you blame the weather though? Crusaders backs still seemed to be able to run and pass well in the same conditions
Front foot ball and a huge glut of possession makes a bit of difference.
-
@Kirwan said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Nevorian said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Kirwan said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Chris-B said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Jailbreak7 thing was, the Crusaders denied the blues any opportunity to show thier game plan.
It started with the lineout, Whitelock owned it, psyched out Eklund and the blues jumpers, allowing total domination, then everything flowed on from there.
It was a masterclass from the senior players in the saders and Razor, hopefully will give Fozzie some ideas cos the Blues looked overawed like the ABS were at times last year.
I thought the starting point was the rain.
My biggest concern was the Blues speed through the midfield - Ioane and Barrett aided by RTS and Perofeta. The rain shut down opportunities for slick handling to put these guys in any space and the smothering defence took care of the rest.
The lineout starving the Blues of possession and territory obviously a serious factor.
For us pretty much everyone played well or very well - I thought probably one exception who shall remain nameless.
Some of the wet weather handling was phenomenal, but even then we struggled getting the ball wide regularlyInteresting to hear Sam Whitelock giving the credit for the defensive lineout tactics to Strange and Grace.
You have to wonder whether Fozzie might have reconsidered his front row selections if he was picking his team tomorrow.
Pretty fair, and I sort of alluded to that as well. In dryer weather, our backs could build pressure to respond to any issues in the forwards. The last two games have blunted that with poor weather and needed to rely more on set piece.
An area to improve, and we’ve been seeing incremental improvements each year. Blues are still a good team, Crusaders were better on the night, and in those conditions.
Of course it bloody blue skys and lovely today. FFS.
Can you blame the weather though? Crusaders backs still seemed to be able to run and pass well in the same conditions
Front foot ball and a huge glut of possession makes a bit of difference.
I must admit that so called Perofeta knock on in one of the few moments they looked threatening was harsh
-
@Nevorian Crusaders did it better - but, Will Jordan for example, was far less of an offensive threat than in dry weather. We were also regularly turning back infield rather than trying to use space wide, because it's too hard to get it there in the wet.
Crusaders had lots of ball, but when the Blues had the ball we were winning the collisions and knocking them backwards - forcing errors.
-
@Chris-B said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Chris-B said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
You have to wonder whether Fozzie might have reconsidered his front row selections if he was picking his team tomorrow.
That involves a) learning and b) admiting you got it wrong. Considering nothing of the sort was mentioned (for example) post lost to Arg, or just blame last year on the long season, I think there would be little change
To be fair - he's dropped Lomax and De Groot from last year's propping group.
We'll have to wait till the next waypoint - selecting the team for the Rugby championship - to see whether he's going to reconsider.
Well he had to drop some players from the mega squad of 2021, and even if DG was unfit, I'd rather have him in and working hard than Karl. Who is in the squad for his scrummaging? Showed it last night!
-
@Kirwan said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Nepia said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
@Kirwan said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:
Blues are still a good team
This is the key, although reading back through this thread you'd think this was the worst Blues side to ever lace up their boots.
A few posters were saving up their gripes from getting their asses handed to them from the Blues.
Are you having a crack at Chiefs supporters? I'd guess that most of us were on your side actually.
Pointing out the shite play from some your key players that Blues fans had been banging on about not being selected for the ABs was pretty fair comment and hardly sour grapes.
Chiefs forwards/Blues backs would have been awesome
