Movie review thread...
-
Whats CGI ? Tried to guess but Closed Graphic Image doesnt sound right.<br />
<br />
This movie is being advertised on tele here at the moment. I might just hit my daughter (works at BC&C) up for some cheap tickets tomorrow and go watch it for myself. -
[quote name='allblackfan']Whats CGI ? Tried to guess but Closed Graphic Image doesnt sound right.<br />
[/quote]<br />
<br />
Computer generated imagery. -
Ah, thanks. If it's anything like the graphics in 300 than it will be awesome. xzxgood
-
[quote name='Virgil']Watched The Darjeeling Limited today, quite enjoyable. Not a big fan of Owen Wilson but its a light quirky little film.<br />
A fun way to spend 90 mins, give it a solid 7.48 out of 10.[/quote]<br />
<br />
Fun ? I didn't like it at all, it's along the same lines as The Royal Tannenbaums which could be described as 'quirky'. At least The Darjeeling Limited is set in an interesting location when they are off the train and wandering the countryside. -
[quote name='Kirwan']Well, it's hard to know where to start with Nepia's opinion on The Watchmen. I'll start with the film does not suck at all, it's not perfect but it's a bloody entertaining comic book film. [b]Perhaps if you were a little bit less focused on Dr Manhatten's penis like some 14 year old moron, you could have enjoyed the film a bit more?[/b] <br />
<br />
I didn't see any hammy CGI as well, the effects were pretty good IMO. The fact that most of the CGI was showing a glowing blue guy is just part of the story. From the trailers I was worried about too much slo mo, but that was used well throughout as well.<br />
<br />
It's very close to the book right up until the end, which doesn't change enough to detract from what the comics were trying to get across. So much detail was in many of the shots it would be worth re-reading the graphic novel inbetween seeing it again.<br />
<br />
They bloody nailed Rorschach too, loved the "You're locked in here with me!" section. Very happy they didn't dumb down the story or the more adult themes for the midwest. Or Nepia.[/quote]<br />
<br />
Nice one dude, focus on the jokey part of my post. <img src='http://www.daimenhutchison.com/invision/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' /> Anyway, I guess I should have expected a backlash from the fanboys. xzxhang1 <br />
Agree that Rorschach was all good but still think movie was poor. That was most disappointing, unfulfilled promise. The pacing was all over the show. The CGI was ho hum in the [spoiler:33gsl3gi]city destroying[/spoiler:33gsl3gi] section - kind of 2002 effects to me.<br />
It was the adult themes I thought were most successful - If you read my post properly it was craftsmen shift I had a problem with, the story is great (especially in the graphic novel.)<br />
But what would I know, I'm too dumb for it, I'll have to go back to watching Epic Movie. xzxsarcastic -
[quote name='allblackfan'][quote name='Virgil']Watched The Darjeeling Limited today, quite enjoyable. Not a big fan of Owen Wilson but its a light quirky little film.<br />
A fun way to spend 90 mins, give it a solid 7.48 out of 10.[/quote]<br />
<br />
Fun ? I didn't like it at all, it's along the same lines as The Royal Tannenbaums which could be described as 'quirky'. At least The Darjeeling Limited is set in an interesting location when they are off the train and wandering the countryside.[/quote]<br />
<br />
The olds gave me a copy of Darjeeling, I watched about 45 minutes and then had to go out. This was about two months ago and I've never felt the need to watch anymore. Just didn't have anything going for it in my opinion. -
[quote name='MN5'][quote name='allblackfan'][quote name='Virgil']Watched The Darjeeling Limited today, quite enjoyable. Not a big fan of Owen Wilson but its a light quirky little film.<br />
A fun way to spend 90 mins, give it a solid 7.48 out of 10.[/quote]<br />
<br />
Fun ? I didn't like it at all, it's along the same lines as The Royal Tannenbaums which could be described as 'quirky'. At least The Darjeeling Limited is set in an interesting location when they are off the train and wandering the countryside.[/quote]<br />
<br />
The olds gave me a copy of Darjeeling, I watched about 45 minutes and then had to go out. This was about two months ago and I've never felt the need to watch anymore. Just didn't have anything going for it in my opinion.[/quote]<br />
2nd that - pretty boring movie i thought, The Royal Tannenbaums was more interesting. -
[quote name='Nepia']I saw Watchmen tonight ...<br />
<br />
4/10. Would have been 4.5 but there's [b]way too much [color=#0000FF]blue penis[/color] in the film[/b].[/quote]<br />
<br />
I still haven't seen it, but was thinking about your comment and had a chuckle when I read this:<br />
<br />
[quote]And sure enough, a number of my fellow midnight film patrons passed the verdict of [color=#0000FF]"too much [b]penis[/b] for me."[/color] But getting worked up over the [color=#0000FF]blue penis[/color] is a failure to notice the rest of the film. [color=#FF0000]A female superhero, Silk Spectre II, is outfitted in a [b]latex body suit with perma-hard nipples[/b][/color], there's a horribly cheesy sex scene set to "Hallelujah," and your overshare problem is the glowing [color=#0000FF][b]blue penis[/b][/color]?<br />
<br />
[url]http://tinyurl.com/ae8kqk[/url][/quote] -
Watched the documentary "King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters" last weekend, then saw it again yesterday.<br />
<br />
Rating: 9/10<br />
<br />
The documentary is about gamers setting world records at Donkey Kong.<br />
<br />
It looks like it was made on a shoestring budget, but it's just a terrific fascinating story with compelling obsessive-compulsive personalities and tension. <br />
<br />
I highly recommend this movie to any sports fan. I am not a "gamer" by any stretch, I don't own computer games and I never had any interest in the arcade games when I was younger. Nevertheless, my eyes were glued to the film.<br />
<br />
Trailer here...<br />
<br />
[youtube:2fmoi75e]xMJZ-_bJKdI[/youtube:2fmoi75e] -
[quote name='Kirwan']I didn't see any hammy CGI as well, the effects were pretty good IMO. The fact that most of the CGI was showing a glowing blue guy is just part of the story.[/quote]<br />
<br />
The reference to CGI doesn't mean much to me anymore. We have to accept that virtually every film, even small indie documentaries with simple Illustrator graphic text titles, uses the technology to some degree to tell a story. CGI means pretty much the same thing these days as "animation," employing animated vectors and pixels. Pixar is considered an animation company, but all Pixar films are CGI, every single frame, and nobody complains that every frame and cell isn't painted by hand. Those guys have the art and science of animation down to photo-realism, and live-action movies are doing the same. -
[quote name='red terror'][quote name='Nepia']I saw Watchmen tonight ...<br />
<br />
4/10. Would have been 4.5 but there's [b]way too much [color=#0000FF]blue penis[/color] in the film[/b].[/quote]<br />
<br />
I still haven't seen it, but was thinking about your comment and had a chuckle when I read this:<br />
<br />
[quote]And sure enough, a number of my fellow midnight film patrons passed the verdict of [color=#0000FF]"too much [b]penis[/b] for me."[/color] But getting worked up over the [color=#0000FF]blue penis[/color] is a failure to notice the rest of the film. [color=#FF0000]A female superhero, Silk Spectre II, is outfitted in a [b]latex body suit with perma-hard nipples[/b][/color], there's a horribly cheesy sex scene set to "Hallelujah," and your overshare problem is the glowing [color=#0000FF][b]blue penis[/b][/color]?<br />
<br />
[url]http://tinyurl.com/ae8kqk[/url][/quote][/quote]<br />
<br />
<img src='http://www.daimenhutchison.com/invision/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' /> <img src='http://www.daimenhutchison.com/invision/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /> <img src='http://www.daimenhutchison.com/invision/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /> <br />
<br />
The sex scene was flippin hilarious, in fact most of the theatre was chuckling when it happened. <br />
Hmmm, I can't remember the perma=hard nipples, but they definitely weren't as in your face as the blue penis. There was a funny scene where Silk Spectre II/Laurie Jupiter said "I have to get something off my chest" while the camera angles was aimed from down looking up at her breasts. -
Role Models; Sean William Scott, Paul Rudd, Elizabeth Banks, McLovin (guy from Superbad) <br />
<br />
6.1/10, just a silly comedy that you will find plenty of moments to smile about, but not LOL funny. -
Hellboy 2.<br />
Was dissappointed. Thought going in, that it was going to be better. It's not bad, but would only rate it 3/5. OK story, decent action, just didn't float my boat.<br />
<br />
YPF. This was a funny relationship movie, but not what you'd expect. Following a number of couples sexual experiences, the friends, the exes, the room mates - it's a good movie. Quite bizarre at times but worth watching! -
[quote name='phoenetia'][quote name='MN5'][quote name='allblackfan'][quote name='Virgil']Watched The Darjeeling Limited today, quite enjoyable. Not a big fan of Owen Wilson but its a light quirky little film.<br />
A fun way to spend 90 mins, give it a solid 7.48 out of 10.[/quote]<br />
<br />
Fun ? I didn't like it at all, it's along the same lines as The Royal Tannenbaums which could be described as 'quirky'. At least The Darjeeling Limited is set in an interesting location when they are off the train and wandering the countryside.[/quote]<br />
<br />
The olds gave me a copy of Darjeeling, I watched about 45 minutes and then had to go out. This was about two months ago and I've never felt the need to watch anymore. Just didn't have anything going for it in my opinion.[/quote]<br />
2nd that - pretty boring movie i thought, The Royal Tannenbaums was more interesting.[/quote]<br />
<br />
Watched it on Saturday because it was my first day off in two weeks and I was feeling ultra-lazy. I saw the cast list and thought "oh yeah, should be pretty clever/funny/light-hearted". Dry as fossilised batshit. Never gained momentum and, while I can appreciate the point where they "found" themselves, it was as slow-paced as Jacob Oram off his short run. -
[b][color=#FF0000]Who the #$&% is Jackson Pollock? [/color]<br />
<br />
Rating: 7.5/10[/b]<br />
<br />
Still getting through my documentaries. This one is not quite as enthralling as "King of Kong" (see above), but this one is still an excellent character study intersecting with a bigger cultural theme(s).<br />
<br />
A crusty old 70+ year old hard-as-nails woman truck driver in California goes to buy her recuperating friend a "get-well" present. She goes to a thrift shop and talks them into discounting an $8 painting for $5 dollars. She gives the painting to her friend, but her friend thinks it's too big and ugly for her apartment, so declines. Old mama truck driver then tries to recover her $5 by selling it at her own yard sale. But a high school teacher comes by the yard sale and says, hmmm, it looks like a Jackson Pollock. She replies, "Who the #$&% is Jackson Pollock?"<br />
<br />
Now, if it were me being the high school teacher, and I suspected a yard sale offering what [i]might[/i] be a Jackson Pollock (value: $50-million) for $5, I would accept that cost as a reasonable risk and plop the fiver down for it. Dumbarse teacher did not.<br />
<br />
I don't want to give away how the film ends, suffice to say (for me especially, being a cynical art school grad who's read Tom Wolfe's "The Painted Word" at least ten times) the larger theme becomes one of science vs. art world snobbery. <br />
<br />
The painting is not signed. But forensic detectives are brought in to prove that the acryllic oil thumb-prints on the painting are those of Jackson Pollock. Spectral analyses ascertains the precise paint on the painting is the same paint found in cans and on the floor of Pollock's studio. If it was murder they were investigating and not the authenticity of a painting, the evidence would be convincing enough to convict a man and send him to the electric chair, but the art world categorically rejects the findings because one) they don't understand science; and two) they are elitist pointy-headed art snobs with degrees from the finest universities looking down their noses at an ignorant old blue-collar truck-driving Grade 8 dropout, and they don't want to admit that she may be right and that they are wrong.<br />
<br />
Sorry, can't find a trailer. -
Saw Watchmen the other night too.<br />
<br />
I loved it. Especially the Geeza with the full mask!! How cool was he? "I'm not stuck in here with you! You're stuck in here with MEEEE!!!" Gee I loved that.<br />
<br />
Long movie, but it kind of needed it I reckon.<br />
<br />
Stoked I saw it on the big screen as it wouldn't have had the same impact on TV
