Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final
-
Robinson suspended by the England Cricket team and won't play in the Second Test
-
-
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
Well Conway and Southee were brilliant at least.....
Who comes in for Santner next test ? He stunk out the joint....CDGH wasn’t much better but I’m sure he’ll be safe.
Someone make way for Trent. Stead can piss off if he thinks he won't select him
-
@canefan said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
Well Conway and Southee were brilliant at least.....
Who comes in for Santner next test ? He stunk out the joint....CDGH wasn’t much better but I’m sure he’ll be safe.
Someone make way for Trent. Stead can piss off if he thinks he won't select him
Yeah but he’s unavailable til the Indian match isn’t he ? Who goes in instead ? Henry ?
-
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@canefan said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
Well Conway and Southee were brilliant at least.....
Who comes in for Santner next test ? He stunk out the joint....CDGH wasn’t much better but I’m sure he’ll be safe.
Someone make way for Trent. Stead can piss off if he thinks he won't select him
Yeah but he’s unavailable til the Indian match isn’t he ? Who goes in instead ? Henry ?
Boult made himself available, contradicting Stead. Clearly their communication could be better
-
@canefan said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@canefan said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
Well Conway and Southee were brilliant at least.....
Who comes in for Santner next test ? He stunk out the joint....CDGH wasn’t much better but I’m sure he’ll be safe.
Someone make way for Trent. Stead can piss off if he thinks he won't select him
Yeah but he’s unavailable til the Indian match isn’t he ? Who goes in instead ? Henry ?
Boult made himself available, contradicting Stead. Clearly their communication could be better
Here’s hoping. Henry’s stats are fucken ugly.
-
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@canefan said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@canefan said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
Well Conway and Southee were brilliant at least.....
Who comes in for Santner next test ? He stunk out the joint....CDGH wasn’t much better but I’m sure he’ll be safe.
Someone make way for Trent. Stead can piss off if he thinks he won't select him
Yeah but he’s unavailable til the Indian match isn’t he ? Who goes in instead ? Henry ?
Boult made himself available, contradicting Stead. Clearly their communication could be better
Here’s hoping. Henry’s stats are fucken ugly.
Matt is a pie chucker. We may need a spinner in the final and Mitch has the inside running. So if Boult doesn't play they may front with the same team
-
@canefan said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@canefan said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@canefan said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
Well Conway and Southee were brilliant at least.....
Who comes in for Santner next test ? He stunk out the joint....CDGH wasn’t much better but I’m sure he’ll be safe.
Someone make way for Trent. Stead can piss off if he thinks he won't select him
Yeah but he’s unavailable til the Indian match isn’t he ? Who goes in instead ? Henry ?
Boult made himself available, contradicting Stead. Clearly their communication could be better
Here’s hoping. Henry’s stats are fucken ugly.
Matt is a pie chucker. We may need a spinner in the final and Mitch has the inside running. So if Boult doesn't play they may front with the same team
Both are unattractive options but yeah, part rounder Santner probably gets in again by default
-
-
@tewaio said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
Ajaz and Boult in for CDG and Satnav for Edgbaston please
Ajaz is definitely the more attacking spin option, and Mitch's batting isn't exactly standing out right now. Buy I just don't see Stead or whoever is selecting the team changing now
-
-
@siam said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
Test cricket will die one day due to low audience numbers. Remember this match when that happens.
Weak as piss England. A pox on the lot of you!
Na, I don’t think this at all. Sure this test was a bit dogshit but a whole day being lost was a huge part of there being no result. I believe we woulda definitely had a winner with that extra day. Probably us, our team is better than theirs.
In other news Wisden tells me Tim Southee has taken 100 test wickets at 21.91 since the start of 2018. Fucken oustanding especially when you consider Trent Boult is usually regarded as the ‘better’ bowler.
-
How can you pick Santner for the WTC final if he just bowled on a fifth day wicket on a the same track against a worse batting order and offered two fifths of fuck all? Not that CdG is much better - but it surely has to be a four-prong pace attack for the final.
-
@rotated said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
How can you pick Santner for the WTC final if he just bowled on a fifth day wicket on a the same track against a worse batting order and offered two fifths of fuck all? Not that CdG is much better - but it surely has to be a four-prong pace attack for the final.
CDGH has test numbers pretty comparable to Ben Stokes which is kinda hilarious.
Santner is the kind of guy who needs to step up with the bat if he bowls with no threat. Which he seems to do every game. A duck last dig certainly doesn’t help matters. Both these guys are obvious weak points in an otherwise immensely strong team.
-
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@rotated said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
How can you pick Santner for the WTC final if he just bowled on a fifth day wicket on a the same track against a worse batting order and offered two fifths of fuck all? Not that CdG is much better - but it surely has to be a four-prong pace attack for the final.
CDGH has test numbers pretty comparable to Ben Stokes which is kinda hilarious.
Santner is the kind of guy who needs to step up with the bat if he bowls with no threat. Which he seems to do every game. A duck last dig certainly doesn’t help matters. Both these guys are obvious weak points in an otherwise immensely strong team.
Mitch is a nothing selection. Shows no ambition whatsoever. If we pick a spinner it has to be someone who can take wickets. Otherwise why bother? Might as well take CDG or another slow medium all rounder who can bat better and to work through a few garbage overs
-
@canefan said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
@rotated said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
How can you pick Santner for the WTC final if he just bowled on a fifth day wicket on a the same track against a worse batting order and offered two fifths of fuck all? Not that CdG is much better - but it surely has to be a four-prong pace attack for the final.
CDGH has test numbers pretty comparable to Ben Stokes which is kinda hilarious.
Santner is the kind of guy who needs to step up with the bat if he bowls with no threat. Which he seems to do every game. A duck last dig certainly doesn’t help matters. Both these guys are obvious weak points in an otherwise immensely strong team.
Mitch is a nothing selection. Shows no ambition whatsoever. If we pick a spinner it has to be someone who can take wickets. Otherwise why bother? Might as well take CDG or another slow medium all rounder who can bat better and to work through a few garbage overs
Gary Stead needs to read the fern cos I’m sick of us all posting this every season and nothing changing.
-
-
@rotated said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
How can you pick Santner for the WTC final if he just bowled on a fifth day wicket on a the same track against a worse batting order and offered two fifths of fuck all? Not that CdG is much better - but it surely has to be a four-prong pace attack for the final.
I'm sure it will be Boult, Southee, Jamieson and Wagner.
We've just got one spot open - to Santner, CDG, JMitch Jr, or Ajaz.
Personally, I'm leaning towards Son of Mitch.
The rules say that the World Test Champion will be the team that wins or draws the game.
I don't mind sharing the title if we have to. Mitch Jr would help that.
And if seam dominates, we can go near Windies on their ass!
-
@rotated said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
I don't get the criticism of England here. You have to play the cards you are dealt and that England batting order is very inexperienced and four guys were sitting on a pair. With Butler and Stokes fair enough, but here it would have been a fools errand - our strong suit against their weakest.
Isn't sport about winning?
So what was the point of Kane even doing a declaration.
It was piss poor by England, showing absolutely no guts or ticker from supposedly one of the games top echelon of teams. Pathetic.
-
@mn5 said in Cricket 2021: NZ in England and WTC Final:
Na, I don’t think this at all. Sure this test was a bit dogshit but a whole day being lost was a huge part of there being no result. I believe we woulda definitely had a winner with that extra day. Probably us, our team is better than theirs.
That's all completely valid mate and England can and should play as they please. The final equation makes the rain day moot in my opinion. At start of play I wanted us to get batting practice for a day. But Kane had other ideas and vastly superior ones to mine in every way - he changed my mind for the better.
Really glad our boys tested themselves. Gave themselves a chance to be challenged and all the development that comes with a tight win or loss. I would hope we'd have chased down what was a sub par ODI total, or even had a go for, say, 3 wickets down and then backed ourselves from there to play out a draw.
This test had nothing on it and was to all intents and purposes a "friendly". A loss wouldn't be the end of the world and the team would have learned something about themselves too.
England, conversely learned hardly anything, didn't get to test themselves under any pressure and had bugger all to talk about in the sheds after the game.
For the sake of test cricket it was not a red letter day. Rugby has moved with the times by turning down gimme penalties for tries and test cricket, I believe, must also show an attitude change with the times. We now know that the game has moved on. For example the adage of batting first provides the most chance of winning is statistically outdated. Similarly to pass up the chance of chasing a win at less than 4 per over would produce a game that garners far more clicks. Is a forgettable draw at all costs the right direction to be headed? Is it more fun to want to draw from 70 overs out?
Would England's attitude have changed if WTC points were at stake? Who knows but I think we saw an illustration that WTC points must accompany every test from here on out.
No biggie that England folded meekly, that's their perogative. Glad that the team I support with less than a third of the resources backed themselves and weren't afraid of failure. Excellent captaincy and a fine example to set for test cricket going forward.
