Force v Highlanders
-
@nta said in Force v Highlanders:
@gt12 said in Force v Highlanders:
Force are looking dangerous here. They are tricky to put away.
"Scrappy" is the word you're looking for.
NZ 7-zip coming up.
Well 8-zip considering tahs tomorrow
You’re right. I think I’m a few minutes behind, they seemed to fuck that up with some pretty average skills.
-
Coltman wouldn’t be Coltman without atleast one crooked throw.
-
Once again that should be a penalty to the defending team. 19 white clearly joins in front of the ball carrier.
-
@derpus said in Force v Highlanders:
@kiwimurph or just create a domestic comp? Dont have to deal with any of this nonsense and unlike you blokes actually have the population for it.
The problem is you need an audience.
-
@antipodean 42k fluffybunnies rocked up to watch us play worse rugby. And viewership was up massively year on year.
No one cares about the 'quality'. It just needs to be an actual competition. Something this aint.
-
@antipodean said in Force v Highlanders:
Once again that should be a penalty to the defending team. 19 white clearly joins in front of the ball carrier.
That’s very fair, they are lucky to get away with that.
-
@derpus said in Force v Highlanders:
@antipodean 42k fluffybunnies rocked up to watch us play worse rugby. And viewership was up massively year on year.
No one cares about the 'quality'. It just needs to be an actual competition. Something this aint.
Quality is still an issue for Super Rugby AU.
The Rebels crowds are awful and they were competitive in Super Rugby AU.
-
@derpus said in Force v Highlanders:
@antipodean 42k fluffybunnies rocked up to watch us play worse rugby. And viewership was up massively year on year.
No one cares about the 'quality'. It just needs to be an actual competition. Something this aint.
I wouldn't extrapolate from a final between the two clearly best teams in the comp.