Brumbies v Chiefs
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="569349" data-time="1459589628">
<div>
<p>Yup I'm fairly certain the kicker has to be moving towards the ball before they can start running. Can anyone clarify the exact law?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div style="margin:0px 7px 0px 0px;font-size:14.72px;color:rgb(42,51,51);font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<p style="font-size:14.72px;">(a)</p>
</div>
<div style="margin:0px;font-size:14.72px;color:rgb(42,51,51);font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<p class="" style="font-size:14.72px;">All players of the opposing team must retire to their goal line and must not overstep that line until the kicker begins the approach to kick or starts to kick. When the kicker does this, they may charge or jump to prevent a goal but must not be physically supported by other players in these actions.</p>
</div> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tim" data-cid="569347" data-time="1459589562">
<div>
<p>Is that the law? I think every ref so far has let players charge at him on his first step.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>You can't charge until the kicker 'begins to approach to kick.'</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="569349" data-time="1459589628"><p>Yup I'm fairly certain the kicker has to be moving towards the ball before they can start running. Can anyone clarify the exact law?</p></blockquote>
<br>
9.b.4<br><br>
All players of the opposing team must retire to their goal line and must not overstep that line until the kicker begins the approach to kick or starts to kick. When the kicker does this, they may charge or jump to prevent a goal but must not be physically supported by other players in these actions -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tim" data-cid="569338" data-time="1459589317">
<div>
<p>I thought you couldn't go back before the last ruck?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>It's two rucks, I believe.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I think the whole thing is a bit of a joke. McKenzie could have just taken the kick quickly because once the kick is taken they can't go back and check.</p> -
You can argue that the backwards step is part of his "approach". Needs to change that, no point giving them a chance.
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Nepia" data-cid="569351" data-time="1459589773">
<div>
<p> </p>
<div style="margin:0px 7px 0px 0px;color:rgb(42,51,51);font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:14.72px;">
<p style="font-size:14.72px;">(a)</p>
</div>
<div style="margin:0px;color:rgb(42,51,51);font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:14.72px;">
<p style="font-size:14.72px;">All players of the opposing team must retire to their goal line and must not overstep that line until the kicker begins the approach to kick or starts to kick. When the kicker does this, they may charge or jump to prevent a goal but must not be physically supported by other players in these actions.</p>
</div>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Many refs decide a player has started to kick when he does a stutter step before actually approaching the ball.</p> -
Anyone else getting a lagy feed?
-
Man the Chiefs backs are exciting to watch. Ngatai, D Mac and Cruds are constantly sparking things on attack.
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tim" data-cid="569360" data-time="1459590247">
<div>
<p>Either way, it's a thoroughly shithouse and unnecessary technique.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I think Barrett does something similar in his technique.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tim" data-cid="569360" data-time="1459590247"><p>Either way, it's a thoroughly shithouse and unnecessary technique.</p></blockquote><br>im unsure about it , it looks a bit NH
