ICC T20 World Cup
-
Always been a Windies fan.<br><br>
But really who cares ... it's only T20 ...<br><br>
Who are the Chiefs playing this week? <br><br>
When are the All Blacks named? It IS Thursday. .. -
<p>well, that was quite the South Africa wasn't it?</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="TeWaio" data-cid="568501" data-time="1459347334">
<div>
<p>89 off 10, 1 down, Munro and KW set. Could be 200 from here.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I think this post sums up everything ( don't mean to pick on you specifically TeWaio ). T20 is a prick of a game in the way it can change in an instant. Still proud of the boys but you definitely got the feeling our attack couldn't save us from the start.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>An England/Windies final would be awesome but I reckon the Indians have timed their form run perfectly, fuckers.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sodhi and Santner have stepped up in the looming absence of McCullum which is good to see, who's gonna replace Ronchi behind the wickets ? shit, imagine if they could actually bat too !</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="568560" data-time="1459377699">
<div>
<p>well, that was quite the South Africa wasn't it?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>No - Bangladesh did a South Africa in their pool match v India, South Africa did not do a South Africa when they lost in the CWC15 semi-final.</p> -
<p>Well, there were some positives from the tournament.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sodhi more than justified his inclusion.</p>
<p>There has clearly been a very smooth captain transition.</p>
<p>A fully fit Santner should be pretty much an autopick in future.</p>
<p>Mitch M demonstrated some good slow med pace.</p>
<p>Fielding unit remains pretty good - some outstanding catches taken.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Negatives</p>
<p>Ronchi. Seriously. No.</p>
<p>Some brittle batting, and more than a few occasions where we stalled/collapsed because batsmen wanted to launch out of the park every ball instead of putting pressure on the bowler with quick singles/singles to twos. Nobody cares if you get out to a peach or a miracle catch, but too often we got out to indecisiveness, lollypopping to the inner circle.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Mokey" data-cid="568580" data-time="1459382384">
<div>
<p>Some brittle batting, and more than a few occasions where we stalled/collapsed because batsmen wanted to launch out of the park every ball instead of putting pressure on the bowler with quick singles/singles to twos. Nobody cares if you get out to a peach or a miracle catch, but too often we got out to indecisiveness, lollypopping to the inner circle.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Kohli's innings showed how this is done. Rebuilt beautifully with fast twos, and then started 4s and then went the full smash. Lovely stuff.</p> -
<p>Kohli is a fucking gun though, probably only Williamson has his talent level, and even that's in a different way. </p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="tubbyj" data-cid="568538" data-time="1459370210">
<div>
<p>Very disappointing effort.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I know India were gunning for us in conjunction with the groundsman but still.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Once Guptill went for 15 I knew we were in trouble even when Munro and Willianson were batting well.</strong> They put up strike rates of the batsman to follow and Taylor was the best on only 117 and thats how it played out.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Good death bowling by England of course but I knew it was coming, the commentators knew it was coming, why didn't the NZ team?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>With all those wickets in hand why not go really hard at their spinners overs 8-16 that was the time to get so far ahead of the game, even if it cost us 5 wickets, that even if we only got a run a ball in the last 4 we would be close enough to 200.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>At more than 8 an over with one wicket down, we were looking very good. Our middle order failed (again) to build on the good start.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>England aren't that well known for their death bowling in T20. Its their batting that has been the impressive part, so we knew we needed 170-180 to put them under pressure.</p> -
<p>Shit maybe I am just really insightful about cricket then. They should make me the blackcaps batting coach.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>However the fact that the English commentary Hussein or whoever it was was verbally felating Jordan in his opening two overs about his amazing ability to consistently bowl blockhole yorkers in the death bowling period and what a great job he has done of doing just that throughout this tournament except in the first game against the Windies and how it was a big part in their run to the semis might be a tipoff I am not the only one who was aware of it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Are people really surprised that our batsman couldn't flay that kind of bowling when South Africa's and Sri Lankas batsman couldn't? We were never in a strong position if we were planning to take 50 runs off the last 4-5 overs</p> -
<p>We got ourselves out to very hittable full tosses from Stokes. On another night those sail over the boundary and we get a good total.</p>
-
Yep, here's hoping they don't suffer the same fate after being unbeaten in pool play!
-
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc-world-twenty20-2016/content/story/993179.html'>http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc-world-twenty20-2016/content/story/993179.html</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:14px;">2 Runs by which New Zealand were ahead of England at the end of the 16th over: New Zealand were 133 for 3 after 16, while England were 131 for 3.<em><strong> From there, New Zealand made 20 for 5 in their last four,</strong></em> while England smashed 28 runs off seven balls at that stage to seal the game with 17 balls to spare.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:14px;">7.74 New Zealand's run rate in the last ten in this World T20; since the start of the Super 10, the only team with a lower run rate in the last ten is Bangladesh - they scored at 7.40 per over.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:14px;">7/64 New Zealand's score in the last ten overs - they managed only four fours and a six during this period. After the first ten they were 89 for 1, with 12 fours and two sixes.</span></p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="568707" data-time="1459414341">
<div>
<p>Yep, here's hoping they don't suffer the same fate after being unbeaten in pool play!</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>They're making a solid effort at it!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Jeez - that was a flukey runout of Devine. I bet the fielder couldn't do that again if she had ten goes at it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Then Bates lobs one up and we are in a very deep hole.</p> -
Chick ferns need to have a hard swing at the ball. Couple of ramp shots that have succeeded in getting a total of three runs wholst running real risk of getting out ...
-
59 off 42<br><br>
Think we're leaving it late...<br><br>
Aggression now girls -
43 off 30<br><br>
Better over<br><br>
Hope Matthews bowls another one<br><br>
50 partnership but they need to put the hammer down -
<div style="margin:0px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:tahoma, arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<div style="margin:5px 0px;font-size:16px;">West Indies Women <span style="font-family:tahoma, arial;font-weight:bold;">143/6 (20/20 ov)</span></div>
<div style="margin:5px 0px;font-size:16px;">New Zealand Women <span style="font-family:tahoma, arial;font-weight:bold;color:rgb(7,86,158);">101/3 (15/20 ov)</span></div>
<div style="margin:0px;font-size:11px;">New Zealand Women require another 43 runs with 7 wickets and 30 balls remaining</div>
</div>
<div style="margin:0px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:tahoma, arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;text-align:right;">
<div style="margin:0px;font-family:tahoma, arial;font-weight:bold;font-size:11px;"><span>New Zealand Women</span> RR <span style="font-weight:normal;">6.73</span></div>
<div style="margin:0px;font-family:tahoma, arial;font-weight:bold;font-size:11px;">Last 5 ovs <span style="font-weight:normal;">31/0</span> RR <span style="font-weight:normal;">6.20</span></div>
<div style="margin:0px;font-family:tahoma, arial;font-weight:bold;font-size:11px;">Required RR <span style="font-weight:normal;">8.60</span></div>
<div style="margin:0px;font-family:tahoma, arial;font-weight:bold;font-size:11px;"><span>West Indies Women</span> RR <span style="font-weight:normal;">7.15</span></div>
</div> -
37 off 24<br><br>
Singles won't do it ladies -
Mind you WASP had us in front at the start of the last over
