• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Australia v India

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.8k Posts 56 Posters 47.3k Views
Australia v India
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #1037

    Agarwal second ball after lunch. These Indian batsmen have the concentration span of an IPL player.

    In all seriousness, too many poor shots from players who generally should know better...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #1038

    Hazlewood is effortless through the crease and it.sings down at 140

    And bang he gets another. What a bowler.

    Fucking shit shot again dick head piss off

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #1039

    Indian batsmen struggle at bouncing Gabba. Colour me shocked....

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #1040

    Black Caps currently have the best pace bowling unit that’s ever played at one time.

    Australia do too and theirs is better than ours.

    fluffybunnies ( said in an admirable way )

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1041

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    Black Caps currently have the best pace bowling unit that’s ever played at one time.

    Australia do too and theirs is better than ours.

    fluffybunnies ( said in an admirable way )

    Given the results in the last 8 matches in Australia, I wonder if India don't have a pace bowling unit equal or better than ours🤔

    Put another way, how would we go with Boult, Timmeh, wags, Jamieson and Kane not playing? Bumrah, Yadav, Shami, Virat, Ashwin, Jadeja.

    Of course we'd just drop Timmeh in order to beat Australia...

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by Siam
    #1042

    Back to reality, the game is delicately poised, due to the weather forecast.
    Got to build the lead but not take too much time. Tailor made for Warner in the second dig

    Set them 350? Stats say that's very rare to chase down but it looks vulnerable to the naked eye.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #1043

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    Black Caps currently have the best pace bowling unit that’s ever played at one time.

    Australia do too and theirs is better than ours.

    fluffybunnies ( said in an admirable way )

    Given the results in the last 8 matches in Australia, I wonder if India don't have a pace bowling unit equal or better than ours🤔

    Put another way, how would we go with Boult, Timmeh, wags, Jamieson and Kane not playing? Bumrah, Yadav, Shami, Virat, Ashwin, Jadeja.

    Of course we'd just drop Timmeh in order to beat Australia...

    Actually that's a pretty fair call, Easy to wank on about their batsmen ( and they as a nation do ) but they also have a fine bowling attack, naturally both nations have spinners we can only dream about too.

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to MN5 on last edited by Siam
    #1044

    @MN5 years ago they got Lillee to help set up a pace bowling program. Since then they've apparently used McGrath too. Given how shit their pace attack used to be, it's a remarkable improvement

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Siam on last edited by MN5
    #1045

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 years ago they got Lillee to help set up a pace bowling program. Since then they've apparently used McGrath to. Given how shit their pace attack used to be, it's a remarkable improvement

    "shit" might be a bit rough but they were definitely military medium on the whole. I always found it odd that next door neighbours Pakistan could produce Hall of famers like Imran, Wasim, Waqar, Shoaib etc and the best they could manage was Srinath, Zaheer Khan and Ishant Sharma......a definite step down in quality.

    SiamS SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1046

    @MN5 yeah shit was a shit adjective. They used to have one perform well with runs coming thick and fast off the others, well in Australia anyway.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1047

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 years ago they got Lillee to help set up a pace bowling program. Since then they've apparently used McGrath to. Given how shit their pace attack used to be, it's a remarkable improvement

    "shit" might be a bit rough but they were definitely military medium on the whole. I always found it odd that next door neighbours Pakistan could produce Hall of famers like Imran, Wasim, Waqar, Shoaib etc and the best they could manage was Srinath, Zaheer Khan and Ishant Sharma......a definite step down in quality.

    Allahu Akbar?

    MN5M boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #1048

    @Snowy said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 years ago they got Lillee to help set up a pace bowling program. Since then they've apparently used McGrath to. Given how shit their pace attack used to be, it's a remarkable improvement

    "shit" might be a bit rough but they were definitely military medium on the whole. I always found it odd that next door neighbours Pakistan could produce Hall of famers like Imran, Wasim, Waqar, Shoaib etc and the best they could manage was Srinath, Zaheer Khan and Ishant Sharma......a definite step down in quality.

    Allahu Akbar?

    righto

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1049

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    Mysterious ways...

    Actually I just think the Indians historically focused on batting and their neighbours the opposite. Now it is a more complete game (for everybody).

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Snowy on last edited by MN5
    #1050

    @Snowy said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    Mysterious ways...

    Actually I just think the Indians historically focused on batting and their neighbours the opposite. Now it is a more complete game (for everybody).

    Yeah true, India have a much richer history of batting greats ( probably to the detriment of their bowlers ) but I suppose Miandad, Inzi the spud and Younis Khan had terrific records.

    canefanC SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1051

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Snowy said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    Mysterious ways...

    Actually I just think the Indians historically focused on batting and their neighbours the opposite. Now it is a more complete game (for everybody).

    Yeah true, India have a much richer history of batting greats ( probably to the detriment of their bowlers ) but I suppose Miandad, Inzi the spud and Younis Khan had terrific records.

    And it's not like India didn't have bowlers (Kapil Dev), but they are generally more famous for their spinners than their quicks. Pakistan by contrast have always seemed to be able to churn out a number of fast medium or quick bowlers, some of whom were excellent all time talents like Wasim and Waqar

    SnowyS SiamS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #1052

    @Snowy said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 years ago they got Lillee to help set up a pace bowling program. Since then they've apparently used McGrath to. Given how shit their pace attack used to be, it's a remarkable improvement

    "shit" might be a bit rough but they were definitely military medium on the whole. I always found it odd that next door neighbours Pakistan could produce Hall of famers like Imran, Wasim, Waqar, Shoaib etc and the best they could manage was Srinath, Zaheer Khan and Ishant Sharma......a definite step down in quality.

    Allahu Akbar?

    What's his bowling average?

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1053

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Snowy said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    Mysterious ways...

    Actually I just think the Indians historically focused on batting and their neighbours the opposite. Now it is a more complete game (for everybody).

    Yeah true, India have a much richer history of batting greats ( probably to the detriment of their bowlers ) but I suppose Miandad, Inzi the spud and Younis Khan had terrific records.

    Got to be pitch related doesn't it? Must be depressing as a kid on Indian pitches?
    Hard to know with Pakistan as they don't play ant home but i assume that they had more bowler friendly wickets.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1054

    @booboo said in Australia v India:

    @Snowy said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 years ago they got Lillee to help set up a pace bowling program. Since then they've apparently used McGrath to. Given how shit their pace attack used to be, it's a remarkable improvement

    "shit" might be a bit rough but they were definitely military medium on the whole. I always found it odd that next door neighbours Pakistan could produce Hall of famers like Imran, Wasim, Waqar, Shoaib etc and the best they could manage was Srinath, Zaheer Khan and Ishant Sharma......a definite step down in quality.

    Allahu Akbar?

    What's his bowling average?

    Seriously good.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #1055

    @Snowy said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Snowy said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    Mysterious ways...

    Actually I just think the Indians historically focused on batting and their neighbours the opposite. Now it is a more complete game (for everybody).

    Yeah true, India have a much richer history of batting greats ( probably to the detriment of their bowlers ) but I suppose Miandad, Inzi the spud and Younis Khan had terrific records.

    Got to be pitch related doesn't it? Must be depressing as a kid on Indian pitches?
    Hard to know with Pakistan as they don't play ant home but i assume that they had more bowler friendly wickets.

    Interesting question. NZ has produced a small handful of world class players, except maybe opening batsmen and spinners.......Maybe Oz and England are the only ones who've got every base covered due to their longevity ? ( ie hard to pick a genuine class Windies spinner although Lance Gibbs sounded decent )

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #1056

    @canefan said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Snowy said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    Mysterious ways...

    Actually I just think the Indians historically focused on batting and their neighbours the opposite. Now it is a more complete game (for everybody).

    Yeah true, India have a much richer history of batting greats ( probably to the detriment of their bowlers ) but I suppose Miandad, Inzi the spud and Younis Khan had terrific records.

    And it's not like India didn't have bowlers (Kapil Dev), but they are generally more famous for their spinners than their quicks. Pakistan by contrast have always seemed to be able to churn out a number of fast medium or quick bowlers, some of whom were excellent all time talents like Wasim and Waqar

    Got a few more? I'm struggling for India...
    Yes spinners, but quicks...

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Australia v India
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.