New Zealand v West Indies
-
@Donsteppa said in New Zealand v West Indies:
Seddon Park has developed a knack of preparing green roads...
"Pull my finger, boss"
-
@antipodean said in New Zealand v West Indies:
@mariner4life said in New Zealand v West Indies:
@antipodean said in New Zealand v West Indies:
Cracking innings. Well done Kane.
not so great, this pitch is obviously a road
Compared to his team mates it was brilliant.
Kylo also mastered the conditions getting 51 NO. The kid has great temperament
-
@Number-10 said in New Zealand v West Indies:
@Godder said in New Zealand v West Indies:
Williamson finally out for his highest test score of 251.
His test average jumps from 50.99 to 52.55.
God damn he’s a little champ. Loving his work
-
A good article on Stuff about Williamson's standing amongst NZ's batsmen.
-
NZ tearing it up this a.m.
6 runs 3 wickets.
Timmah has two. Boult grabs the other.
Good catch by Blundell.
-
Awful batting by Brathwaite just hanging the bat
-
@Bovidae said in New Zealand v West Indies:
A good article on Stuff about Williamson's standing amongst NZ's batsmen.
Good article and hard to argue any of it to be honest aside from maybe putting Taylor at 3.
It’s easy to forget a guy like Andrew Jones, him and Crowe at 3 and 4 were brilliant.
-
5 down now.
Kylo cleans out Bravo, then Wags (We loves Wags) gets the LB on review.
79-5
-
@Damo said in New Zealand v West Indies:
Jamieson looks to be a great allrounder in the making.
Ball is still hooping around even though its 63 overs old.
Do we enforce follow on? I think we do if the conditions remain the same.
I would bat unless rain is expected. Put on a quick 150, rest the bowlers, wear out the opposition.
-
@Godder said in New Zealand v West Indies:
@Damo said in New Zealand v West Indies:
Jamieson looks to be a great allrounder in the making.
Ball is still hooping around even though its 63 overs old.
Do we enforce follow on? I think we do if the conditions remain the same.
I would bat unless rain is expected. Put on a quick 150, rest the bowlers, wear out the opposition.
Ordinarily I would agree. Here though the ball is hooping around like mad, and we've already had some rain. I think the play is to finish it off asap.
-
@Damo said in New Zealand v West Indies:
@Godder said in New Zealand v West Indies:
@Damo said in New Zealand v West Indies:
Jamieson looks to be a great allrounder in the making.
Ball is still hooping around even though its 63 overs old.
Do we enforce follow on? I think we do if the conditions remain the same.
I would bat unless rain is expected. Put on a quick 150, rest the bowlers, wear out the opposition.
Ordinarily I would agree. Here though the ball is hooping around like mad, and we've already had some rain. I think the play is to finish it off asap.
Kolkata 2001 (?) showed us how followons can go poorly. If the bowlers get tired, things can get away from you. That said, given we're halfway through the day and have some rain, I think it's arguable to enforce. But, Tim has bowled 17 overs already... it starts to add up quickly.
-
@Damo said in New Zealand v West Indies:
Jamieson looks to be a great allrounder in the making.
Ball is still hooping around even though its 63 overs old.
Do we enforce follow on? I think we do if the conditions remain the same.
Such a dream start to his career. He’s in an established team with other excellent players, I really hope he maintains the momentum.
-
Pretty disappointing effort from the Windies after the openers showed nice application last night. Holder will be especially disappointed that his bowlers didn't use the conditions as effectively as ours. Follow on feels like the right decision. Massive lead and a pitch that should only get easier to bat on. Batting last probably an advantage overall. We've basically taken 9 wickets in a little over a session so massive momentum with the bowlers.
-
@Damo said in New Zealand v West Indies:
That low catch looked fine to me. Wasn't much doubt about it was there?
Yep, not quite sure why Bishop is repeating that there will be some discussion around it like it will be controversial. It was very close to the ground, but I thought he always had fingers between the ball and the ground
-
@Donsteppa said in New Zealand v West Indies:
@Damo said in New Zealand v West Indies:
That low catch looked fine to me. Wasn't much doubt about it was there?
Yep, not quite sure why Bishop is repeating that there will be some discussion around it like it will be controversial. It was very close to the ground, but I thought he always had fingers between the ball and the ground
agree
I'd love to see public guidance on this (and forward passes in teh rugby, for that matter). Show people what's OK ... foreshortening always makes those look dodgy as, but they're usually clean