Tasman v Canterbury
-
@African-Monkey I was about to say - @ACT-Crusader is still here! Kudos!!!
I'd actually rather Canterbury didn't get relegated as they are my second team - but, if they can save themselves by beating Auckland, that will do nicely!
-
@Chris-B @ACT-Crusader Hence why I said 'nearly' hahaha. Yes I was thinking of you @ACT-Crusader when writing it.
-
On a more serious note, that Canterbury side should not be where they are. They're light in a couple of areas but their forward pack on paper is still one of the stronger ones in the comp. It's still a good enough side to challenge for the title imo.
-
@African-Monkey said in Ta$man v Canterbury:
On a more serious note, that Canterbury side should not be where they are. They're light in a couple of areas but their forward pack on paper is still one of the stronger ones in the comp. It's still a good enough side to challenge for the title imo.
I agree
Depth is the main issue. Still, anything outside a top 3 finish should be considered a failure for that squad
-
Canterbury looking good so far.
-
Drummond’s play is all over the show. High passing, poor kicks.
Forward pack going very well.
-
Ta$man may wanna rethink throwing to the back.
-
Ta$man are going to have to do better if Canterbury are permitted to do anything at the ruck.