• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Aussie Pro Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
australia
5.2k Posts 136 Posters 924.0k Views
Aussie Pro Rugby
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #2452

    @Machpants said in Aussie Rugby:

    @NTA SO that means FTA rugby for Oz? But for less money. I choice for the long term, with fingers really really crossed!

    I'm hoping 2 Aussie games per week which will help right the ship. Means more private equity will need to be found but I don't think that's a bad thing given Twiggy Forrest is willing to part with some cash for his "beloved" Force. As long as RA stop asking clubs for $50 / player from my club to help mend the fences, I'm good with it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #2453

    @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

    Last November, Castle walked away from Foxtel’s $40m-a-year, five-year offer for the broadcast rights (Foxtel is part-owned by News Corp, publisher of The Australian). Castle was pushing Foxtel for $100m more.

    Is this true or News Corp spin?

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #2454

    I dunno but pre Covid Oz rugby was probably not getting it's true value, cosy club with Foxtel IMO.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #2455

    @Bovidae said in Aussie Rugby:

    @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

    Last November, Castle walked away from Foxtel’s $40m-a-year, five-year offer for the broadcast rights (Foxtel is part-owned by News Corp, publisher of The Australian). Castle was pushing Foxtel for $100m more.

    Is this true or News Corp spin?

    So Fox's offer was $200M over 5 years (I think that was split into cash + advertising/production costs).

    I believe Castle was pushing Fox for a bigger amount over the 5-year contract, in the firm belief that Optus were coming to market with a serious offer north of $40M per annum in total. Can't say exactly what it was, but going from $40M to $60M per annum is not chicken feed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    wrote on last edited by
    #2456

    About 25 years too late, honestly

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #2457

    I'm prepping for an epic meltdown if the NPC gets dumped in all this.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #2458

    @Nepia said in Aussie Rugby:

    I'm prepping for an epic meltdown if the NPC gets dumped in all this.

    NRC?

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #2459

    @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:

    @Nepia said in Aussie Rugby:

    I'm prepping for an epic meltdown if the NPC gets dumped in all this.

    NRC?

    It will be an even more epic meltdown if I'm forced to watch the NRC too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • UniteU Offline
    UniteU Offline
    Unite
    wrote on last edited by
    #2460

    Assume 9 won’t pick up the NPC or NZ Super Games and they would still hopefully be on Fox?

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to Unite on last edited by
    #2461

    @Unite said in Aussie Rugby:

    Assume 9 won’t pick up the NPC or NZ Super Games and they would still hopefully be on Fox?

    Super will be a package deal so I assume it will go to 9 too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #2462

    There is a bit of talk about what it means for broadcast of other competitions beside SRAu and TRC - a bit of horse trading about NRC and Premier Club Rugby no doubt as well?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by
    #2463

    Probably good for Aussie rugby but not for me and many who are not going to drop fox. I will keep fox since they cover cricket and NH rugby too. It just means we have to now pay extra for an inferior service. Streaming is nowhere near as stable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #2464

    Why do you think streaming isn't as stable, akan? Just asking out of interest.

    I stream through Kayo, and I also have a Stan subscription. Will keep Kayo for all the other sport I watch, but will thoroughly recommend picking up Stan if it gets the rugby. Has a great range of movies and TV shows on there.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #2465

    I'll be considering dropping Kayo again. From what I recall Ch9's bid is to have a game of rugby on FTA, and the rest on STAN (it's streaming service).

    And I'm uninterested in getting STAN.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to barbarian on last edited by akan004
    #2466

    @barbarian I have streamed via foxtel go a few times and have had a few drop outs/buffering issues but hopefully that's specific to that service only. I know Spark NZ had a few issues with their RWC streaming coverage. There is also the possibility albeit a rare one of internet outages.

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #2467

    My experience with the Fox streaming service was utter, utter shite. That was fairly early on tho and they have historically been very resistant to moving away from their STB roots under the Fox banner.

    I've had the Kayo service in the past and there were a couple of issues that were clearly server-side as multiple users were complaining about a certain broadcast. But overall I thought it was a great experience, bar the price - all those other sports are pointless to me.

    Therefore $10 / month for Stan looks like a bargain for rugby and the other stuff they have. If I can get a new Google Chromecast to log into all my accounts at once, even better.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #2468

    P.S. Eat a massive bag of cocks, Rupert.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #2469

    @akan004 said in Aussie Rugby:

    @barbarian I have streamed via foxtel go a few times and have had a few drop outs/buffering issues but hopefully that's specific to that service only. I know Spark NZ had a few issues with their RWC streaming coverage. There is also the possibility albeit a rare one of internet outages.

    Fair enough. I've never really had an issue with Kayo. I get my money's worth. Been off work sick for a few days last week and binged watched a heap of sports docos they have on there.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by Nepia
    #2470

    I’m happy with the service, but, I’ll drop Kayo the moment the rugby goes - I only use it for rugby and the Warriors.

    Already have Stan so I’d love it if the rugby went there.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #2471

    I need streaming services to become a tax deduction...

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Aussie Pro Rugby
Sports Talk
australia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.