• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hawke's Bay v Canterbury

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
canterburyhawkesbay
139 Posts 28 Posters 4.8k Views
Hawke's Bay v Canterbury
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #74

    @Bones said in Hawke's Bay v Canterbury:

    37 years!

    5 minutes

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #75

    We've beaten Canterbury. That monkey is off our back.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #76

    I liked what I saw of Darry tonight.

    Hawke's will be happy they weren't relying on McClutchie to kick a goal to win a game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #77

    Number 10N 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #78

    @KiwiMurph hopefully he gets the start next week.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by
    #79

    For me , one of the key things was the Magpies having experienced heads Parsons, Dixon and Evans On the paddock deep into the game .
    And Canterbury’s bench I thought did’nt really offer a lot..
    On Fakatava, yes he’s a young guy , but at the minute he suffers from the Augustine Pulu syndrome, what’s in it for me is my first option ..he actually surveys before clearing the ball, to the point of delaying putting extra pressure on the midfield ..

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #80

    What a nailbiter that was. Best forwards for me were Flanders, Dixon and Parsons, although O'Connor also won a few important turnovers. And, of course, Evans as soon as he came on. Best back by far was Jonah Lowe, but youngsters McClutchie, Fakatava and Toala also had a good game.

    The ref was annoying, but I think he didn't disadvantage one team more than the other.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #81

    Congratulations Hawkes Bay!

    Jeez - there's a bit of a lack of weaponry in that Canterbury team.

    Give it to Mataele, but if he doesn't do something big, there's not many others who are regularly going to make big plays.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    wrote on last edited by
    #82

    Congrats Hawkes fans, always great to break hoodoo teams. Not only a big win, but also a great fight! Well deserved, enjoy!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #83

    That celebration. Of the players and the crowd. That's how much it means.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #84

    Shield last week, then this. Ouch

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #86

    Well done Hawkes Bay. Good final play.

    No leadership in those last few minutes from our boys. Far too erratic.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #87

    @Duluth I'll set that on repeat for the rest of the weekend. :face_with_stuck-out_tongue:

    HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #88

    @Chris-B said in Hawke's Bay v Canterbury:

    Congratulations Hawkes Bay!

    Jeez - there's a bit of a lack of weaponry in that Canterbury team.

    Give it to Mataele, but if he doesn't do something big, there's not many others who are regularly going to make big plays.

    Was Mataele playing?

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Number 10N Offline
    Number 10N Offline
    Number 10
    wrote on last edited by Number 10
    #89

    He was limping and feeling his hamstring in the first ten minutes.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Number 10N Offline
    Number 10N Offline
    Number 10
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #90

    @Stargazer said in Hawke's Bay v Canterbury:

    1982 not 1983

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #91

    Well played HB. Certainly a few holes in our side with disruption from the current All Blacks all being gone, a bunch of kids on the bench covering the front row, inexperienced midfield, lacklustre out wide etc. But still, 15 or so SR players in the 23 should be enough most weeks. The experienced HB forwards made a big difference, and their largely unheralded backs were superior to ours too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #92

    Just wondering what I'd do differently with the team next week. I don't think there is any fire-power we can bring into the squad in the front row unless Brodie McAlister comes back from injury (and Harry Allan, but I think he's gone for the season?) I'd certainly have Romano in the 23 though, for his grunt. Which probably means Prinsep sitting it out unless he starts at 6 and Sanders moves to 8. I'd give Burke a start, McLeod for Poihipi if fit, and both Punivai brothers to start with McKay to fullback for Newstubb.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #93

    Darry looked useful, although he needs to add some bulk. Pity the Blues have locked him up for the next three years. And on that note, likewise Otago and the Highlanders re Will Tucker. Both highly promising locally produced locks at 2m+ and both lost to the Crusaders when we need to be considering how we replace Whitelock. I read that Razor said Darry didn't want to compete for a spot. Ouch.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Hawke's Bay v Canterbury
Rugby Matches
canterburyhawkesbay
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.