• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 133.9k Views
'Super Rugby' 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to antipodean on last edited by Derpus
    #1151

    @antipodean What? so fox aren't driving down the price despite their actions resulting in exactly that because... they said so?

    You must be quite the businessman.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #1152

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I guess you probably wouldn't notice not being particularly interested

    This was discussed in depth on here.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #1153

    @Nepia fair enough

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #1154

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @antipodean What? so fox aren't driving down the price despite their actions resulting in exactly that because... they said so?

    So Fox talking up products they'll want to secure again in the near future is what exactly? It's not difficult for most people to determine value by crowd attendances and viewership. Apparently Fox and Optus et al have people who have some experience and capability in the field.

    You must be quite the businessman.

    I bow to your expertise.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #1155

    @antipodean right, and cutting advertising funding for a product will do what to viewership numbers?

    As someone above said, there is next to no visibility for Rugby in Aus. I don't think it's particularly crazy to suggest that it's to Fox's advantage to keep it that way until they secure the rights again.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Derpus on last edited by antipodean
    #1156

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @antipodean right, and cutting advertising funding for a product will do what to viewership numbers?

    As someone above said, there is next to no visibility for Rugby in Aus. I don't think it's particularly crazy to suggest that it's to Fox's advantage to keep it that way until they secure the rights again.

    Was it to Fox's advantage while they had the rights and people weren't watching nor attending?

    How hard is it to understand Fox don't see the value? Apparently neither does any other broadcaster. Why would that be do you think?

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to antipodean on last edited by Derpus
    #1157

    @antipodean maybe you are right. But if so, why did they bid for it initially?

    They still plumped for A-League who's figures are significantly worse than Rugby's. I'm not really convinced.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #1158

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @antipodean maybe you are right. But if so, why did they bid for it initially?

    They still plumped for A-League who's figures are significantly worse than Rugby's. I'm not really convinced.

    where do you see the figues? i thought i had read A-League/football had overtaken rugby in the sport hierarchy

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by Derpus
    #1159

    @Kiwiwomble Just as an example: 'OzTam reported the A-League’s season restart saw just 12,000 viewers on Fox Sports for the Friday night matchup, followed by 9,000 the next day for the second matchup on Fox Sports.'

    Ministry of Sport - Your MVP in the Business of Sport.

    Ministry of Sport - Your MVP in the Business of Sport.

    The leading platform on sports business news, insights, and events, connecting the sports industry with the latest trends and opportunities around the world.

    Even the Rebels have been pulling 40-50k plus an additional (rumoured, no official figures) 25% -40% on Kayo.

    I think the Semi-final attendance figure will be telling. It's reportedly open to 25k people. TV figures for the final will also be interesting. A-league final got about 84k supposedly.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #1160

    so, in short, there is absolutely nothing wrong with rugby in Australia, it's strong and peachy and a desirable product

    it's all NZ's fault, and Foxtel's fault, and Rupert's fault, and the ex-Wallaby Captain's fault. If they all fucked off it would be the '90s again.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by Derpus
    #1161

    @mariner4life fucken hell, i never said anything like that? There's loads wrong - the majority of it self inflicted by RA. I've never said anything other than this. Fox are being dicks though, and cutting a team won't fix the underlying issues.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #1162

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Kiwiwomble Just as an example: 'OzTam reported the A-League’s season restart saw just 12,000 viewers on Fox Sports for the Friday night matchup, followed by 9,000 the next day for the second matchup on Fox Sports.'

    That's misleading - those A-League games were also on free to air live in Australia so people just watched them on free to air instead of Fox.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by Derpus
    #1163

    @KiwiMurph It's not misleading when talking about the value to Fox - which is what we are discussing.

    What do Fox care about FTA figures?

    gt12G KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #1164

    @Derpus

    Didn't they get the football for like half of what they paid before?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #1165

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @KiwiMurph It's not misleading when talking about the value to Fox - which is what we are discussing.

    What do Fox care about FTA figures?

    I meant just in terms of overall numbers viewing - of course FFA would get broadcast $ from Free To Air too.

    Regarding the A-League Grand Final ratings see below (the maths seem out by 1k though).

    A Foxtel spokesman informed the Herald 151,000 people watched the match on Foxtel. Of those, 84,000 watched via the Linear box services while 66,000 watched on either Foxtel Now, Foxtel Go or their over-the-top sports streaming service, Kayo. 
    
    D KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1166

    @KiwiMurph That's a way higher percentage streaming than i had heard previously, which is interesting.

    It will be interesting to see how the semi-final and final of SRAu compare with those figures.

    And, yes, i believe following Covid the TV deal for A-league was renegotiated from 50 odd to 25 odd million PA.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #1167

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Kiwiwomble I can't really be bothered to reiterate why. I've said it before in this thread.

    But you've just massively, MASSIVELY contradicted yourself!

    You can't be bothered reiterating why RA should persevere with the Rebels in Melbourne, but you admit the NRL is "pushing shit uphill" with massively superior resources and an already successful Storm side??

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to shark on last edited by Derpus
    #1168

    @shark nah - they'll never be the biggest team in Melbourne. Doesn't mean they arent worthwhile.

    But even if they should be cut, this doesnt contradict any of the reasons I gave as to why they wont.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #1169

    That can't have been good. What'd he say??

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #1170

    The thing is, I've advocated for the Rebels. But holy fuck, that was the mother of all contradictions.

    mariner4lifeM D 2 Replies Last reply
    1

'Super Rugby' 2021
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.