• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 133.9k Views
'Super Rugby' 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #743

    @Chris not surprised, the AFL goes out of its way to help the out of state and newer teams, priority draft picks, out of state payments etc

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #744

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    just to removed any doubt, these are the reported memberships for the AFL clubs last year

    da4c2154-1fa2-479a-966f-53c544fe1977-image.png

    im sure there is some creative accounting but that is the size the the beast Rugby is trying to compete with in Melbourne even before you looks at the A-League and the Storm and hell, the VFL gets some ok crowds, i go to watch Port Melbourne more often than anything else

    there were multiple games last season that were mid table, mid season, so not playoffs or teams on a great run of form...and we're over 80k in the ground...they love their clubs

    Yet more proof that the GC is where sporting teams die.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #745

    @antipodean will be interesting if it changes next year, the Suns have had some good results

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #746

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @antipodean will be interesting if it changes next year, the Suns have had some good results

    Won't change a thing. The GC is where sporting teams die. The AFL has been here before with the Bears. They'll be propping up this team forever unless they can find another Melbourne team to merge with it and relocate.

    It's the same with basketball, rugby, league, soccer, tiddlywinks. The GC isn't interested.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #747

    Brutal Super Rugby Aotearoa opens door for Rugby Australia in trans- Ta$man negotiations

    SnowyS KirwanK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #748

    @Stargazer said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Brutal Super Rugby Aotearoa opens door for Rugby Australia in trans- Ta$man negotiations

    So we are saying that we need some soft cocks to fill in the gaps? Bring on the Force? Dilute the competition so that it is not worth watching? FFS.
    What happened to quality? Less is more, etc? Quality over quantity? Bigger crowds and more TB viewers.

    They have a chance to get this right, even if it means more bye weeks and fewer games for player recovery time.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #749

    @Stargazer said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Brutal Super Rugby Aotearoa opens door for Rugby Australia in trans- Ta$man negotiations

    That's the weakest weak shit I've read so far about this new comp.

    Can boil it down to "rest your players against our shit standard". Unbelievable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #750

    @Snowy spot on. This feels a lot like the glory days of Super 12 rugby, where there were massive tussles every week. Loving the comp.

    If you get the quality, the crowds and funds follow. The Super 18 can fark off, less is more.

    I note that the NFL is a 16 game regular season - and that's it. Wonder why we can't do a proper 12 team comp, accept its' going to be 11 weeks, and then there is international rugby to fill the gaps. I'd rather focus for three months, than suffer through 4-5 months of meaningless competition where you can be out of contention before the cricket sesaon finishes.

    gt12G barbarianB 2 Replies Last reply
    6
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to nzzp on last edited by gt12
    #751

    @nzzp

    Agreed. The very best thing about this competition is that the winless Chiefs could beat the Crusaders this week, and fuck everything up for them. You can't miss a game.

    I can't believe that the powers that be haven't worked out that having two shorter competitions would be better than one long, crappily designed competition.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #752

    @nzzp Because money. It's fine if you're the NFL and can pull a TV audience of 16m each game. But we aren't the NFL.

    Unless we can find private equity money, both the NZRU and RA are reliant on TV revenue. And to get that revenue, we to provide more than 11 weeks of content.

    It's a shitty situation to be in, because we are forced to choose (somewhat) between quality and quantity. Both in terms of how many rounds and how many teams in the comp itself.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #753

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @nzzp Because money. It's fine if you're the NFL and can pull a TV audience of 16m each game. But we aren't the NFL.

    would love to know what the vieweing numbers were for Super 12 when it was running. Also, remember there are internationals as well -- so you get a 14-15 week comp (depending on byes), and then another 3-6 top tier international games (plus all the overseas ones). Then you can run an amateur or semi-pro comp internally before an end of year tour

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #754

    for comparison, from 2005 (still Super 12)

    https://www.allblacks.com/news/rugby-viewership-and-match-attendances-rise/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    wrote on last edited by
    #755

    I just want to watch a couple of good games of rugby each weekend, like we are getting now. I don't believe that reducing the quality increases the viewership.

    So the TB networks will have to play replays or find other content rather than playing cripple fight, no contest, matches.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #756

    We've been down the road of "more teams, more fixtures, more money" and we've seen what has happened to a competition that used to be the best in the world.

    If I wanted to watch a weekly dirge that never seemed to end, I'd watch NH club rugby.

    It's all well and good looking for more fixtures, but selling advertisement space for declining viewership makes no sense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #757

    There's a medium that can be found between bloated Super 18 and super intense but not sustainable Super Rugby Aotearoa.

    Let's say they look at 10 teams - 5 Aus 5 NZ - for 2021 where everyone plays everyone once and then you play 4 teams twice.

    I'd like to see the 4 teams twice be 2 teams from NZ and 2 teams from Aus so that it's somewhat fair.

    It then ends up being a nice balance between extra NZ derbies/Aus derbies and fairness.

    Of course it's not perfect - some teams will draw Crusaders twice and others will draw Force twice - but it's heading in the right direction.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #758

    I don't care as much about uneven draws as others. In the end the best teams come out on top. I genuinely can't think of a year where Super Rugby was won by an undeserving team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    wrote on last edited by
    #759
    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #760

    @Snowy said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    You take that back now. The Waratahs were the most deserving teams across all competitions and all years.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #761

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Snowy said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    You take that back now. The Waratahs were the most deserving well-resourced and underperforming teams across all competitions and all years.

    FTFY

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by barbarian
    #762

    @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Snowy said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    You take that back now. The Waratahs were the most deserving well-resourced and underperforming teams across all competitions and all years.

    FTFY

    Well resourced and underperforming we may well have been, but we were also capital-c Champions in 2014. And it's my sole purpose here to remind you all of that fact as much as I possibly can.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1

'Super Rugby' 2021
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.