• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 133.9k Views
'Super Rugby' 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #311

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Machpants not without pillaging the other 9 teams.

    Lotsa money and they could pillage the North, but that's not going to happen

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #312
    As well, we will also be working with Rugby Australia to seek expressions of interest from their current Super clubs and other interested parties to join the competition and that work will begin in earnest
    

    How likely is this scenario?

    • ARU says 5 clubs or 0 clubs
    • NSW, Queensland, Brumbies etc apply for licenses anyway
    • ARU can't stop them
    • NZR is in control of the competition and just has to deal with the license holders

    The ARU is disorganised
    The states have robust political competition and don't give a fuck about each other

    M barbarianB D 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #313

    @Duluth Ouch, I'd hope not. I'd rather an amicable arrangement that helps both Unions

    DuluthD NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Machpants on last edited by Duluth
    #314

    @Machpants

    Yeah it would be bad for Aus rugby. They would have to create a Wallabies side from GRR and SR but have no control over the competitions

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #315

    @Duluth Very unlikely. States won't ditch RA, it effectively would be a mutiny. For all the Board turmoil, things are pretty united right now.

    And I really doubt RA would go down a '5 teams or zero' road.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #316

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    And I really doubt RA would go down a '5 teams or zero' road.

    It would be unwise, but they do have seem to have that reputation.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #317

    @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Duluth Ouch, I'd hope not. I'd rather an amicable arrangement that helps both Unions

    I think it will get to that eventually. Oz will propose all five teams, NZ will say nope, Oz will either say ok or twiggy will bankroll the entire WA entry including getting NZ teams there, then hopefully they both agree to ditch the PI team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #318

    From the start RA wanted a 10 team TT comp with a view to future expansion into PI and Japan.

    What the NZRU have proposed is so close to this I really can't see them being unhappy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #319

    The way this is unfolding, I'd prefer a Super Ten with five teams each from NZ and Australia. If Australia can't sort it's shit out and four or five of their sides are consistently just fodder for the NZ squads, then so be it. I just hope the Aussie viewers don't mind if they don't have any semi-finalists year on year. But I want to see a full round robin or home and away RR. None of this conference bullshit which only serves to unfairly advantage poor Australian squads. Nine rounds and a bye week is too brief. With finals that's not even a three month comp. Double RR with two bye rounds is 22 weeks or a little more than five months. Mid Feb to late July.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #320

    @Duluth Won't happen purely because the states receive a large portion of their funding from RA. Most of the better players are on RA contracts as well. They would become unviable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #321

    @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    The way this is unfolding, I'd prefer a Super Ten with five teams each from NZ and Australia. If Australia can't sort it's shit out and four or five of their sides are consistently just fodder for the NZ squads, then so be it. I just hope the Aussie viewers don't mind if they don't have any semi-finalists year on year.

    The thing is - the Aussie viewers do mind.

    And so do the NZ viewers - there's plenty of entertainment value in watching the Crusaders pump yet another Aussie team, but it's not compelling viewing.

    We need to get back to something like Super 12, where everyone was competitive most years - or SH rugby will die on the vine. Oz appears already to be in deep shit and if they topple, we're left open to being picked off by NH. We can't afford charity teams like the Force. Tbh I've no idea how they'll afford a Pacifika team, but presumably someone has a plan.

    sharkS D 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #322

    I love how in this debate all Australian teams have become 'cannon fodder', rather than the reality of 1-2 really good sides, 1-2 middling sides and 1-2 poor sides like us AND SA have been pretty much every year.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to barbarian on last edited by Snowy
    #323

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I love how in this debate all Australian teams have become 'cannon fodder', rather than the reality of 1-2 really good sides, 1-2 middling sides and 1-2 poor sides like us AND SA have been pretty much every year.

    It is pretty much why super rugby wasn't "super" anymore. Over expanded and reduced the quality.

    The powers that be and covid might be on track to fix that.

    D Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #324

    @Snowy the new TT comp is going to bring back the 120+ Australian professional rugby players playing in Europe and Japan? because that's the primary issue.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #325

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Snowy the new TT comp is going to bring back the 120+ Australian professional rugby players playing in Europe and Japan? because that's the primary issue.

    If that happens, then sure, more quality, depth and room for a greater number of teams.

    How many of them are actually any good? Past it? Will they stay post covid?

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #326

    @Snowy said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I love how in this debate all Australian teams have become 'cannon fodder', rather than the reality of 1-2 really good sides, 1-2 middling sides and 1-2 poor sides like us AND SA have been pretty much every year.

    It is pretty much why super rugby wasn't "super" anymore. Over expanded and reduced the quality.

    The powers that be and covid might be on track to fix that.

    Yep!

    How many of the expansion teams ever made the play-offs?

    The Jaguares did.

    I think the Cheetahs might have once.

    Pretty sure none of the Force, Rebels, Southern Kings or Sunwolves ever did.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #327

    @Chris-B said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    The way this is unfolding, I'd prefer a Super Ten with five teams each from NZ and Australia. If Australia can't sort it's shit out and four or five of their sides are consistently just fodder for the NZ squads, then so be it. I just hope the Aussie viewers don't mind if they don't have any semi-finalists year on year.

    The thing is - the Aussie viewers do mind.

    And so do the NZ viewers - there's plenty of entertainment value in watching the Crusaders pump yet another Aussie team, but it's not compelling viewing.

    We need to get back to something like Super 12, where everyone was competitive most years - or SH rugby will die on the vine. Oz appears already to be in deep shit and if they topple, we're left open to being picked off by NH. We can't afford charity teams like the Force. Tbh I've no idea how they'll afford a Pacifika team, but presumably someone has a plan.

    That was a rhetorical statement re the Aussie viewers. Of course they'd mind, but if the ARU is going to cave and push for five teams then they'll have to be prepared to suffer as a result. The Force squad is piss poor and if the meagre talent among the other four teams is further dispersed then there'll be some ugly results for Aussie fans.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #328

    @Snowy there are loads of quality players in that list, many who would walk into the Wallabies. Sean McMahon, Skelton (European champion), Arnold x 2, Kerevi, Latu, etc etc. They may not all be test standard but the depth they would add to SR's would be huge and the player drain is the primary reason Australian rugby has slumped over the past 5 years.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #329

    @Chris-B said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    The Jaguares did.

    They were always going to. A strong national side and one team. A shame that Japan couldn't get there too because they really should have, but I guess the domestic competition countered it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #330

    @Chris-B We've won the competition twice in the last 10 years, both of those final wins being against the Crusaders. I'd point out that over the 25 year life of the competition the Crusaders have only lost a final against another NZ team once (the Blues). It's three times to Australian teams.

    So if you think Super Rugby Aoteroa is gunna be 'more competitive' history suggests otherwise. Certainly, the Crusaders are going to walk away with the title this year.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0

'Super Rugby' 2021
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.