Filling McCullums' Boots in ODIs

Donsteppa

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Gunner" data-cid="558064" data-time="1455212638">Can someone re-name this thread something like 'breeding programmes to produce the perfect cricketer', so I don't click back in here in the hope of reading about the NZ cricket team post McCullum. 
Ta.</blockquote>
 
Are you new here?

KiwiPie

Interesting article on McCullum - sort of captures the discussion we've been having here.
 
<a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/971039.html'>http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/971039.html</a>

Virgil

Nice run through of his test career as well <a class="bbc_url" href="http://nzh.tw/11588290">http://nzh.tw/11588290</a>

gollum

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Virgil" data-cid="558108" data-time="1455225728">
<div>
Nice run through of his test career as well <a class="bbc_url" href="http://nzh.tw/11588290">http://nzh.tw/11588290</a>
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Thats quite grim reading actually. The standout bit is the way it kept going
 
"Australia / SA / England - fuck all"
"Bangladesh / India (not in India), a ton"
 
Repeat.

Siam

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="gollum" data-cid="558388" data-time="1455279735">
<div>
Thats quite grim reading actually. The standout bit is the way it kept going
 
"Australia / SA / England - fuck all"
"Bangladesh / India (not in India), a ton"
 
Repeat.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Fuck me, they've moved Hyderabad!
 
Test 54, Hyderabad: c Dhoni b Sreesanth 4 c Raina b Sreesanth 225

gollum

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="558391" data-time="1455280304">
<div>
Fuck me, they've moved Hyderabad!
 
Test 54, Hyderabad: c Dhoni b Sreesanth 4 c Raina b Sreesanth 225
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Yep, you are right. He did manage a big ton in India. And another in UAE which takes some doing. Tho' it was a weird test where no one wanted to play it & no one seemed sure if they could bowl bouncers etc.
 
The point about SA, Aussie, poms etc stands tho. Go one, read thru that listing, its fucking grim.

Siam

Yep never a great batsman - test average of 38 and a few records is nothing too deriding though
 
But will forever have my admiration, and for me it's been thrilling and entertaining to watch him play

gollum

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="558393" data-time="1455281110">
<div>
Yep never a great batsman - test average of 38 and a few records is nothing too deriding though
 
But will forever have my admiration, and for me it's been thrilling and entertaining to watch him play
</div>
</blockquote>
 
The bit that irks me on this is he is, without any shadow of a doubt, our finest T20 batsman ever. And genuinely up there with the best T20 batsmen in the game. Anywhere. And far & away our best ever ODI keeper, and at least in the frame for our best test keeper.
 
But the press seem hell bent on trying to pile on stuff that isn't there. Its like this staggeringly sad chip on shoulder / small country thing to pretend its more than it is. When the actual stuff is pretty fucking impressive. I've switched to the aussie comentary because the degree to which Ian Smith is losing his shit is amazing. It gets worse when you have our press trying to get the Aussies to say how amazing he is & yet not go "You know Aaron Finch has 7 tons in 55 ODIs right? & can't get anywhere near the test team". Its almost painful.

rotated

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="gollum" data-cid="558395" data-time="1455281881">
<div>
The bit that irks me on this is he is, without any shadow of a doubt, our finest T20 batsman ever. And genuinely up there with the best T20 batsmen in the game. Anywhere. And far & away our best ever ODI keeper, and at least in the frame for our best test keeper.
 
But the press seem hell bent on trying to pile on stuff that isn't there. Its like this staggeringly sad chip on shoulder / small country thing to pretend its more than it is. When the actual stuff is pretty fucking impressive. I've switched to the aussie comentary because the degree to which Ian Smith is losing his shit is amazing. It gets worse when you have our press trying to get the Aussies to say how amazing he is & yet not go "You know Aaron Finch has 7 tons in 55 ODIs right? & can't get anywhere near the test team". Its almost painful.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
To me it's a bit like if the media got all misty-eyed over Keven Mealamu when he retired. Obviously they didn't because bigger names retired simultaneously but if people started prattling on and suggesting her was the best tight forward of his era (let a lone all time) then for someone who actually watched most of those games you would begin to wonder if you watched different games over the past decade.
 
Both had long careers to be sure and were certainly very talented in specific facets/styles of game but to their core role they regularly struggled at the very top level and were never close to being the best player on their team and never head and shoulders the best in their position. Both had impressive careers but it should be seen as churlish to correct the record when others start waxing lyrical about match winning efforts that never happened.
 
The praise being lavished on McCullum for his 100th is so markedly different from Vettori and Fleming - it's very strange, some definite media suckling to be sure.

Siam

Best NZ cricket captain ever, retiring. That's worth a bit of palaver

gollum

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="558399" data-time="1455293189">
<div>
Best NZ cricket captain ever, retiring. That's worth a bit of palaver
</div>
</blockquote>
 
See, I don't buy that either.
 
Possibly the best leader with had... yeah. IE a guy wjo was at the core of setting a great ciulture & inspiring the guys.... but captain? IE the guy who's job it is to make the right decisions & smart calls on the park? I'd contrast Baz with his "attack, then attack more, then attack" with say Crowe's captaincy at the 1992 WC, or Fleming in Australia, Fleming verbally going at Graham Smith etc. Great captains have more than one gear.
 
To me calling him our best ever captain is just another go at over reaching to try to heap praise on the guy.

Bovidae

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="rotated" data-cid="558397" data-time="1455289612">
<div>
To me it's a bit like if the media got all misty-eyed over Keven Mealamu when he retired. Obviously they didn't because bigger names retired simultaneously but if people started prattling on and suggesting her was the best tight forward of his era (let a lone all time) then for someone who actually watched most of those games you would begin to wonder if you watched different games over the past decade.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
The funny thing about Mealamu is when the media mentioned all of the ABs who would be retiring after RWC 2015 he was often forgotten and not mentioned at all. Sumo was one person who was guilty of doing exactly that!
 
Back to McCullum, often the media over-reacts "in the moment" but with the benefit of hindsight and time, a more accurate portrayal of their standing in the game becomes apparent. If NZ continues to do well (by our standards) with this current group of players McCullum's standing as a leader/captain will be diminshed somewhat. Conversely, if we begin to struggle his "legend" grows. As I say, hindsight.
 
At this point in time, BMac will be in the NZ cricket record books as having the highest test score. He should be extremely proud of that achievement.

Frye

Not gonna miss his tossing.

hydro11

When Fleming retired I remember there was a big deal about him getting his average up to over 40. He hit two fifties I think in his final test at the Basin. There was a decent amount of fuss made about him and that was at a time when Fleming wouldn't have made most of the world's top test sides.
 
I actually did the stats once on McCullum and found out that he won about 46% of the tosses as captain. It was a below par record but not really statistically that unlikely.

MN5

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="gollum" data-cid="558037" data-time="1455183208">
<div>
I'd hazard it has less to do with conditions & more to do with genetics.
 
To head off on a tangent, it that part of Asia inter group marriage is staggeringly rare, so where in the West we are very much a mess of genes, in India & Pakistan the gene pool is usually very concetrated & its astonishing at first travelling round there how various areas are blatently genetically a mile away from each other. In India I'm pretty much guarenteed to be the talest guy in the room, especially in the south. In Lahore & north of there I'm often the shortest. Northern Pakistan is, genetically, almost your ideal fast bowler. And not surprisingly its where all of Pakistans quicks hail from. Lahore is a production line for great quicks. And at a guess I expect if you gene tested the folks from there you'd find 99% was from that area way back.
 
In contrast NZers will be 10% scots, 15% Maori, 27% Pom, 3% tongan, etc.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Javagal Srinath was a fairly tall stapping fella though.
 
Shit I'm starting to sound like Smudge now.

hydro11

McCullum has won 56 tosses and lost 64 tosses over his career as captain. When he losses the toss we have won 36 games and lost 19. when he wins the toss we have won 24 games and lost 26. Losing 8 more tosses than you win is hardly a massive statistical aberration. Applying a cumulative binomial probability distribution there is a 26% chance that McCullum would have won 56 or less tosses out of his 120. So if you were to pick 4 random cricket captains you would expect a least one in four of them would lose the toss as much as McCullum does (on average).
 
This is also why I think human perception is so terrible. Almost everyone has this idea that McCullum loses a lot of coin tosses and is statistically terrible at them. The truth however, is very different. McCullum's record at the coin toss really isn't very bad at all, people just think it is. This is why we should use statistics like averages which are objective and are not beholden to human biases.

Frye

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="558466" data-time="1455327392">
McCullum has won 56 tosses and lost 64 tosses over his career as captain. When he losses the toss we have won 36 games and lost 19. when he wins the toss we have won 24 games and lost 26. Losing 8 more tosses than you win is hardly a massive statistical aberration. Applying a cumulative binomial probability distribution there is a 26% chance that McCullum would have won 56 or less tosses out of his 120. So if you were to pick 4 random cricket captains you would expect a least one in four of them would lose the toss as much as McCullum does (on average). 
This is also why I think human perception is so terrible. Almost everyone has this idea that McCullum loses a lot of coin tosses and is statistically terrible at them. The truth however, is very different. McCullum's record at the coin toss really isn't very bad at all, people just think it is. This is why we should use statistics like averages which are objective and are not beholden to human biases.</blockquote>
 
McCullum has only ever had 5 draws as captain?

taniwharugby

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="558466" data-time="1455327392">
<div>
McCullum has won 56 tosses and lost 64 tosses over his career as captain. When he losses the toss we have won 36 games and lost 19. when he wins the toss we have won 24 games and lost 26. Losing 8 more tosses than you win is hardly a massive statistical aberration. Applying a cumulative binomial probability distribution there is a 26% chance that McCullum would have won 56 or less tosses out of his 120. So if you were to pick 4 random cricket captains you would expect a least one in four of them would lose the toss as much as McCullum does (on average).
 
This is also why I think human perception is so terrible. Almost everyone has this idea that McCullum loses a lot of coin tosses and is statistically terrible at them. The truth however, is very different. McCullum's record at the coin toss really isn't very bad at all, people just think it is. This is why we should use statistics like averages which are objective and are not beholden to human biases.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
so do you have the toss resultsin order to ensure the anomolies in perception are just that rather than a poor run of luck that has been off set by a good run early on or vice versa

dogmeat

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="558399" data-time="1455293189">Best NZ cricket captain ever, retiring. That's worth a bit of palaver</blockquote>
 
Best ever follow me over the top lads death or glory chaps Undoubtedly 
Best captain. Howarth Coney. Fleming all have at least equal claims. 
Howarth and Flem were both acknowledged as the most astute captains in the world at times. 
Baz has latterly been acknowledged as a leader and for the way he plays the game but no one says he's the best captain. 
I think he's done a great job but the valedictories have become a bit of a wank fest. 
Never forget too he was responsible for one of the most venal acts by a black cap ever so he's not always been whiter than white.

TeWaio

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="558460" data-time="1455325865">
When Fleming retired I remember there was a big deal about him getting his average up to over 40. He hit two fifties I think in his final test at the Basin. There was a decent amount of fuss made about him and that was at a time when Fleming wouldn't have made most of the world's top test sides.</blockquote>
 
A decent amount of fuss was made.....it's still my signature!

The Silver Fern

Filling McCullums&#39; Boots in ODIs

Filling McCullums' Boots in ODIs