• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NZ v Australia Test #1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
525 Posts 47 Posters 27.5k Views
NZ v Australia Test #1
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #160

    <p>If we get to 200 it will be a bloody miracle. Fuck there have been some godawful shots played today.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #161

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="558226" data-time="1455239346">
    <div>
    <p>450-500 isn't out of reach if these two really apply themselves. Craigs height is such an unbelievably good asset when he bats. Remarkable really .</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Still trying to pretend that taller bowlers don't find it easier to get more bounce?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #162

    <p>Will have to be 525/8 dec now...</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #163

    <p>Nice hitting, Mr Anderson</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p><img src="http://orig05.deviantart.net/eb7d/f/2010/336/3/a/agent_smith_demotivator_by_party9999999-d341sge.jpg" alt="agent_smith_demotivator_by_party9999999-"></p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #164

    <p>Might as well declare and get the Aussies in ASAP, while there still might be a slither of assistance in the pitch for the bowlers.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Unless Tim feels like bashing 50 off 20 balls, then I'm happy for them to hold off on the declaration for another 5 overs.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #165

    <p>Just need Southee to come off like he's never come off before.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Glath
    wrote on last edited by
    #166

    <p>That's so Southee.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #167

    <p>Yep, that shot was lame as fuck.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    wrote on last edited by
    #168

    <p>Mark Craig could replace a few of our top order batsmen. </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #169

    <p>Can just see DDD knocking most of these 140 runs off himself and Aussie ending up 150/0 at the end of the day</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Fuck, what a way to ruin a Friday.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #170

    <p>Craig takes 16 from a Siddle over.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #171

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="SammyC" data-cid="558240" data-time="1455240814">
    <div>
    <p>Mark Craig could replace a few of our top order batsmen. </p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Yep, who knew he'd been recalled to be our best batsman today...</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #172

    <p>all bonus from here and will no doubt frustrate the Aussies.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #173

    <p>Boult only knows one way....</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #174

    Could have been much worse, think we will take that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #175

    <p>Now to see if our knob-ends can stand up to a bit of accuracy and a wicket doing more than a road.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    wrote on last edited by
    #176

    <p>Shit effort from everyone except Anderson, Watling and Craig.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #177

    <p>The 10th and 8th wicket partnership are our best - perhaps indicating the early life in the pitch has settled down.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>We haven't quite lost the test in the first session, but we've taken some massive strides towards it.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Very disappointing!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #178

    So ... Australia trail by 183 currently ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #179

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Donsteppa" data-cid="558232" data-time="1455239948">
    <div>
    <p>Still trying to pretend that taller bowlers don't find it easier to get more bounce?</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>He's not even tall. Nice gutsy innings though.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

NZ v Australia Test #1
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.