Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures
-
What would an Australian fantasy structure look like?
The NRC variants have never captured the public imagination. But Shute shield still does.
If a national ring-fenced competition club competition was created, based on existing clubs. Do you think it would alienate too many people or create a bigger audience than current pro structure?
E.g. if went something like
Randwick
Manly
Warringah
North Sydney (Northern Suburbs club)
Eastwood
Brisbane GPS
Brisbane Brothers
Sunnybank
West Brisbane
ACT Brumbies
Melbourne RebelsCentral contract top 30 players by ARU. Fill out rest with market rates. No restrictions on overseas players (e.g. PI tied players).
Playing at cheap suburban grounds.Legal separation to protect the amaatuer club from goinmg under if it all goes tits up.
Day time rugby for at least 3 games per week getting families to grounds.
Note: I'm guessing at the popularity of Brisbane teams other than GPS and Brothers.
I've excluded the University clubs, don't seem a good fit for professional potential.
All of western Sydney is missing. -
@Rapido Wests have been terrible for a long time. The unis are considerably more competitive. Canberra won the Brisbane premier grade three years running and that was the end of their involvement. Sydney club rugby is much stronger than Brisbane. The Shute Shield is normally a case of someone contesting Syd Uni.
-
@Rapido said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
But Shute shield still does.
*IF you are someone associated with one of those clubs. Some of the Shute Shield clubs number membership in the hundreds and the top ones only a few thousand.
If you play park footy - Suburban Rugby - you've maybe got a slight interest toward the local Premier Club, but more often you're in conflict with them - competing for players, mostly. And they're poorly run buckets of shit who piss and moan that they don't get massive handouts. My club kicks off at the same time as First Grade.
As with NRC not capturing the imagination (of Sydney Premier Rugby, really), the Shute Shield system will not capture the imagination of people outside those clubs.
BUT they have grounds, history, junior feeders, and a tantrum about playing in a national comp and getting those sweet, sweet subsidies so they can continue to buy trophies.
So fuck it, give them a crack.
-
Yeah. I'm just putting forward a structure, in my case 11 teams. 5 rounds each weekend. 1 bye
I'm not trying to argue the actual teams. Although I say with Australia $16m in debt and losing $9m a year. They can't bankroll a new competition with new 'amalgamated' or made up teams that need subsidising and marketing. It would need to be based on existing infrastructure, so based on existing Sydney and Brisbane club teams with the Rebels and Brumbies.
Hell, I've totally forgotten about the Force. They'd be allowed in if they changed their name to a grown-up name. So, 12 teams. I doubt Twiggy will be as interested if Force is domestic rather than Asia-Pacific?
-
@antipodean said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Rapido Wests have been terrible for a long time. The unis are considerably more competitive. Canberra won the Brisbane premier grade three years running and that was the end of their involvement. Sydney club rugby is much stronger than Brisbane. The Shute Shield is normally a case of someone contesting Syd Uni.
I just see University clubs as being too narrow, and the links between the individual and club forming too late in life to be a structure that would work for professional sport. GPS and Brothers may be narrow too, but links formed earlier, and often familial.
Although in South American football, "Universtario" etc are big clubs in places like Chile.
-
@Rapido said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@antipodean said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Rapido Wests have been terrible for a long time. The unis are considerably more competitive. Canberra won the Brisbane premier grade three years running and that was the end of their involvement. Sydney club rugby is much stronger than Brisbane. The Shute Shield is normally a case of someone contesting Syd Uni.
I just see University clubs as being too narrow, and the links between the individual and club forming too late in life to be a structure that would work for professional sport. GPS and Brothers may be narrow too, but links formed earlier, and often familial.
Although in South American football, "Universtario" etc are big clubs in places like Chile.
Unis in the Brisbane comp have (or are) merging with junior established rugby clubs in their vicinity.
-
@Rapido I don't see too much need for change in NZ's domestic rugby structures. You could merge a few NPC teams - Otago and Southland are the obvious ones at present. Harbour and Northland has a reasonable case. And Manawatu and Hawkes Bay should have happened years ago!
A Canterbury- Ta$man merger/takeover has no logic in the current environment.
I reckon Super rugby is going to continue pretty much as scheduled once we get on top of CV.
What fucking Bill Beaumont really needs to focus on is stopping the Northern Hemisphere looting the Southern Hemisphere with its sugar-daddy cash.
Let's see if he's willing to rein in his rich mates or if he's a useless c#nt!
-
@mariner4life Because what is in an individual club's interests is not necessarily in the interests of world rugby.
Just because I can afford to buy Lake Taupo and use it to store bleach, doesn't mean I should be allowed to.
-
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
And Manawatu and Hawkes Bay should have happened years ago!
Just because Malborough and Nelson Bays made an unholy alliance doesn't mean we all have to ... plus I'd rather not go down your invitational XV route.
-
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
What fucking Bill Beaumont really needs to focus on is stopping the Northern Hemisphere looting the Southern Hemisphere with its sugar-daddy cash.
Covid's going to do more about that than Bill can.
-
@nzzp said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
What fucking Bill Beaumont really needs to focus on is stopping the Northern Hemisphere looting the Southern Hemisphere with its sugar-daddy cash.
Covid's going to do more about that than Bill can.
Maybe - but, usually the rich come out of these things better than what the poor do.
-
@Nepia said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
And Manawatu and Hawkes Bay should have happened years ago!
Just because Malborough and Nelson Bays made an unholy alliance doesn't mean we all have to ... plus I'd rather not go down your invitational XV route.
Unholy Alliance???
God is with us - it says so on our Cup!
-
@Dice bloody hell, that's incredible.
and at about Rand73M, I don't think there's any way for SA to compete.
Just googled, and no, there's no way. The ENTIRE WAGE BILL of Western Province is R78M. So he's earning as much as 128 contracted players (over three years).
Anyone still think SA won't have their player stocks decimated again? Especially if you can keep playing for SA if you want to?
-
@nzzp said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
What fucking Bill Beaumont really needs to focus on is stopping the Northern Hemisphere looting the Southern Hemisphere with its sugar-daddy cash.
Covid's going to do more about that than Bill can.
Debatable. Unless of course you prescribe to the theory in the stuff column that Auckland is now a much better place to do business than London or New York.
-
@MajorRage said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@nzzp said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
What fucking Bill Beaumont really needs to focus on is stopping the Northern Hemisphere looting the Southern Hemisphere with its sugar-daddy cash.
Covid's going to do more about that than Bill can.
Debatable. Unless of course you prescribe to the theory in the stuff column that Auckland is now a much better place to do business than London or New York.
The reason I think it'll be better for NZ is that it probably hits a couple of points.
Firstly, if economic times are tougher, a number of owners are less likely to pump money into clubs, and youd' then expect player salaries will drop. I can see TV rights dropping as well, as there won't be as much cash to splash around. NZ will suffer as well, but probably not as much as the club salaries up north.
Secondly, the 'lifestyle' reasons for living NH/SH will change. The perception of safety and security for living in NZ compared to overseas changes
I think that will tip the balances at the fringe. Reduced reward, less benefit, and suddenly the attraction of heading north won't be quite as strong. I may be totally wrong, but I think it's a pretty credible situation.
-
@nzzp It's credible, but given what's happening, it seems unlikely that SH salaries won't drop as well.
For what it's worth, I'm not speaking from a position of hope. Despite living up here, I have no real interest in rugby in this country (for lots of different reasons) but I'll still watch super rugby. Al So much better for me if the best NZ players are down there than up here.
Hard to know if you are right on the lifestyle reasons. On the outside yes. But I know when I was 22 I was desperate to get out and see the big wide world. I think that still holds true, as it doesn't matter what growth / attraction NZ gets out of this (if you read stuff, it's going to be AMAZING), NZ location wise is still the arse end of nowhere and it's difficult to get out and see the world from - these things are pretty important in you 20's.
Don't get me wrong, I sure as fuck wouldn't recommend coming here right now and I have no idea how long that will last for. My homesickness for NZ is the worst it's ever been right now.
But reality is that if NZ GDP goes up 5 fold, and UK drops 50%, it'll still be twice as large up here than in NZ. Similar in France too.