Coronavirus - New Zealand
-
@dogmeat I don't see how any of the topics you listed were off topic? The economic/political aspects are definitely worth discussing.
Especially police overreach, how we get out of this hole we are in, as well as how the lockdown is going and the health impact.
It's all completely linked. I guess we could start splitting into specific threads if people are finding that this is jumping around too much?
-
@dogmeat said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
This thread started out being about corona virus.
Now it seems to be much more politics than discussion about the virus. In fact apart from reporting of the daily numbers I can't recall anything about the virus as I've just caught up on all the posts over Easter. Just a bunch of people giving their opinions about how fucked up everything is but pretending that they are talking facts. Or criticising opinion pieces while quoting opinion pieces that support their own prejudices. Stating NZ was or wasn't on this or that trajectory before the lockdown is just an opinion. the one fact is that from a low base our graphs were tracking the same as every other countries so something had to be done. Whether our action was the right one it is impossible to predict yet. Time (and countless Royal Commissions) will tell.
Of course the economy is suffering but it is disingenuous to suggest that tourism wasn't completely fucked without a lockdown.
Some harsh realities. Plenty of people are quoting the fact that a high proportion of the people currently dying would have died in the next 18 months anyway. Cruel fact but true.
Similarly a high proportion of the businesses that are going to fail would have failed in the next 18 months. Cruel fact but equally true. Particularly as @mariner4life said we were well overdue a significant correction anyway.I don't know how bad it is going to get for the economy. I don't even want to guess but bad really bad. We're forecasting a $12 mill shortfall this year (25%). Frankly I'd take that in a heartbeat. We've asked everyone to take a 10% pay cut in the hope that we can save jobs and are only too aware of the hardship this will pose for many who live hand to mouth.
It was heartening to see that there will be a lot of detail released this wee; stimulus package, economic forecasts, criteria for Levels 3 and 2, criteria for the same. Once we have all that I think we will all be in a better position to read the frozen chicken entrails and pontificate. In the meantime it seems to me reading this that the lock down has us all needing to chill.
This thread still is about the wuflu, but the virus has impacted every aspect of peoples lives, and the decisions around the disease are now political.
It is understandable that as the decision to panic will get more and more analysis, those who are ardent supporters of the govt and the decision would like to see discussion shut down. -
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@dogmeat I don't see how any of the topics you listed were off topic? The economic/political aspects are definitely worth discussing.
Especially police overreach, how we get out of this hole we are in, as well as how the lockdown is going and the health impact.
It's all completely linked. I guess we could start splitting into specific threads if people are finding that this is jumping around too much?
They arent jumping around, they are related.
-
@Godder said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
I have 10 years experience in fast food which as an industry is a lot of franchisee and independent SMEs and a few businesses with 100+ employees (head offices of the big names, Restaurant Brands, Burger King). Most of that was as a store manager in franchisees, so budgets and impact on staff of difficult decisions was something I was very familiar with.
One point from that experience is that a decrease in revenue wouldn't usually eliminate a business in that industry because a lot of costs would reduce in line with the revenue reductions, so the margin would reduce but still be there. In fast food, that will mostly be food costs and labour costs through reducing rosters.
However, if revenue drops enough, the margin becomes 0 or negative because the fixed costs (rent and opex, power, insurance, some bank fees, interest on debt, refurbishment costs, to name a few) and debt repayments become unmanageable. Business loans are usually higher interest and shorter terms than mortgages, so can easily overwhelm a business.
Something like that would play out across most small businesses. If they are owned outright and have 3 months of working capital, they will probably be in a good place to make it out the other side, possibly on a smaller scale. If they have 2 weeks working capital and a large business loan, it will be much harder.
In businesses with 0 employees like a hairdresser or contractor, 20% reduction might be fine if the profit is still a liveable wage, or disastrous if they have equipment loans or fixed costs that see profit reduce well below a liveable figure.
It's a big range out there, and people will need a range of help.
Burger King has just gone into receivership..
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/121000806/burger-king-franchise-owner-in-receivership
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback was asking for opinons basically.
I'm inclined to agree with you, but can see the benefit in have an economic one. Can't see how you can extract the politics when the PM is deciding when we can take a shit.
-
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback was asking for opinons basically.
I'm inclined to agree with you, but can see the benefit in have an economic one. Can't see how you can extract the politics when the PM is deciding when we can take a shit.
Probably better to create a medical one then?
I think part of it is that the narrative and acceptance levels are changing and some people dont like that. If you cannot refute an argument .. shut it down. The very FIRST post in this thread is one talking about govt action....
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback @Kirwan or a medical thread.
-
@Kirwan @Baron-Silas-Greenback It's not the topics under discussion so much as the repetitive tone. Reading four days in one hit I was struck by a) how negative it all was probably because b) it was almost exclusively about how Cindy has destroyed the economy. This was presented as fact, but that's not (yet) accurate.
Again as one marathon read it did have the feel of some of the politics threads and was very echo-chambery.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback I'll take a punt on them intending to sell up and wipe the debt through receivership, and another operator will take over.
-
@dogmeat said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@Kirwan @Baron-Silas-Greenback It's not the topics under discussion so much as the repetitive tone. Reading four days in one hit I was struck by a) how negative it all was probably because b) it was almost exclusively about how Cindy has destroyed the economy. This was presented as fact, but that's not (yet) accurate.
Again as one marathon read it did have the feel of some of the politics threads and was very echo-chambery.
Maybe because that is exactly how some of us feel? No different to those who are holding the line that Ardern did the right thing.
I think the echo chamber you should be more concerned about is the one which just accepts nationwide house arrest.,
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
The very FIRST post in this thread is one talking about govt action....
Unintentionally, threads just got split that way by Duluth
My ten cents worth; it's all intertwined.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback Yes you made your point eloquently about 400 posts ago. Which is my point. The telling thing is it's how you feel.
I do like that when you were asked what you had done differently you had a plan. Of course your plan doesn't have to bear scrutiny in the same way the lockdown does.
The move To Lvl 4 blindsided me, as I said at the time, because it didn't follow the established protocols. Whether it was the right move - as I said too early to say for sure. I'm sure govt was privy to information that hasn't been shared. Maybe we were way less prepared than they have let on and Lvl 4 was seen as the best bad choice.
Dunno - it's all conjecture
-
-
It’s worth pointing out that the most vocal critic of the government on this thread has said that in his opinion National would have done the same. Didn’t see anyone contradict that either.
So characterising the thread as just critical of Jacinda is wrong.
This is just one of the ways we can make our opinions heard, am sure people on here have contacted MPs where appropriate as well.
If we have over reacted (say compared to Sweden or Australia), and we think both major parties would have acted the same, doesn’t that point to a systemic problem that we should address?
You may say that the economy is not ruined yet, but even the most rosey assessment is that we are in for a significant amount of damage.
If we have a disaster response that causes as much damage as the disaster we should probably fix that.
-
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback was asking for opinons basically.
I'm inclined to agree with you, but can see the benefit in have an economic one. Can't see how you can extract the politics when the PM is deciding when we can take a shit.
There's nothing wrong with having more threads.. it makes ongoing conversations easier to follow. An overall economic thread, a UK thread whatever.
After the initial exponential growth of new coronavirus threads we have seen a sharp declineIt would be almost impossible to have a NZ virus thread that doesn't discuss the govt response though.
-
@Duluth said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
After the initial exponential growth of new coronavirus threads we have seen a sharp decline
Hah! Tune in every day at 1pm to find out how many threads have been generated, and how many are locked