NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry)
-
Epic game
-
@anonymous Stupid rule, btw. Should be allowed to have 15 players on the park.
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@anonymous Stupid rule, btw. Should be allowed to have 15 players on the park.
Nonsense. If you elect to go uncontested scrums, you should lose a player.
-
@antipodean They didn't elect it. They lost two hookers to injury and then the rules say uncontested scrums, because there isn't a hooker on the field. It wasn't a tactical decision.
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@anonymous Stupid rule, btw. Should be allowed to have 15 players on the park.
Nah, great rule because you made the scrums go uncontested. Otherwise if you are getting done in the scrums you take off both hookers and get a huge advantage.
-
@stargazer Yeah, but the rule has to be this way cause the officials can't tell if it's because of injury or "injury".
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@hydro11 I repeat, it wasn't a choice. It wasn't a tactical decision. Both hookers got injured.
Yes but history tells us that if rules can be exploited, they will be. It's like with Pocock and the quick conversion means you can't go to the TMO.
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@antipodean They didn't elect it. They lost two hookers to injury and then the rules say uncontested scrums, because there isn't a hooker on the field. It wasn't a tactical decision.
Immaterial. You can fake injuries.
-
What a cracking try. Brilliant run by Nanai.
-
-
-
@machpants said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
Ooh three more points AKL?
Nope awful kick, AKL just need to hold it for three minutes
-
@antipodean You can solve that by letting the team with the two injuries play with 14 men during the scrum, and then allowing a fifteenth player on after the next stoppage.
