Auckland vs Otago
-
Otago deserved that win,no question..!,well deserved
-
Well done Otago. We didn't deserve to win that. Good learning curve for a young Auckland side.
-
@african-monkey very well said,just leadership was the difference,not the end of the world,this is a very young side something that should not be forgotten..
-
@stargazer Didn't suprise me one bit tbh. Otago aren't a bad side and would have run Canterbury a lot closer if they took their chances last week. Not trying to make excuses for Auckland but it was a very young side out there lacking leaders and we paid the price for it and as I said earlier in the thread, I expected it to go down to the wire. Faiane, Nanai, Gibson and Whetton were missed badly out there and I hope to never see Ravouvou again.
-
@stargazer not overly surprised given some of the personal Auckland had missing and losing 2 players early would not have helped ,but on saying that credit to the visitors..they were better on the night..
I do like the look of Jacob Umaga,only 21 years old looks like he has time and good game management.. -
Take solace in the results showing in the Mitre10Cup.co.nz website which shows the score currently at Auckland 26 - 00 Otago
-
Anonymous said:
Higgins said:
Anonymous said:
taniwharugby said:
@higgins they would then just go back to the first offence, which is why there was an advantage?
Technically they could reverse it as it could be classified as foul play. But carding them without it being a repeat infringement would be a bit harsh.
So Collins' infringement was a first offence and not a repeat one but still earned a yellow. Surely a deliberate infringement is a deliberate infringements and be met with equal sanction no matter how many times it has previously occurred.
Collins' infringement was classified as cynical though since Otago was in a compromised position.
You're inventing an infringement. The ref clearly said "you can't knock the ball back". He did not say "you can't knock the ball into touch".