• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby News

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
5.2k Posts 139 Posters 1.4m Views
Super Rugby News
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #2277

    @Tim To be honest - no. He's only NPC level at present and I don't see that he's got weaponry in terms of speed, size, skills etc that he'd going to be exceptional.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to SammyC on last edited by
    #2278

    @SammyC Signing McKay as a fullback indeed makes sense if they decide not to re-sign McKenzie; otherwise you have only Dagg and Havili who can play fullback. Bateman was signed as a 10 in 2017 (but played all his games at 12). So if they're not going for a rookie such as Brett Cameron, Bateman is the logical choice, esp if they want experience in that young backline.

    @Chris-B Why Dunshea? Bedwell-Curtis was pretty handy this year. Whetu Douglas is another one they could consider (he's on a one year contract with Treviso; his 2nd year was optional).

    And why a 4th halfback? They only had 3 this year.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #2279

    @Stargazer Dunshea - mainly just my speculation that he'd going to be seriously good if he can stay fit. Big and very fast. Didn't realise Douglas was already an option. If you want Bedwell Curtis could also sign Dunshea as lock cover and let Strange go.

    4th halfback - because I rate Enari and Stratton, I don't really rate Fukofuka, and Hall seems like a year to year proposition.

    I'd love it if we could shed Fukofuka - but, I think we can afford to use a slot to carry a 4th halfback for a year.

    Otherwise, we could end up with Drummond and Fukofuka in 2019 - Hall overseas and Enari and Stratton at other franchises.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #2280

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #2281

    @Stargazer I wonder if he's doing that with an eye to return a better player or beat the five-year residency requirement?

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to antipodean on last edited by Stargazer
    #2282

    @antipodean Apparently, he wants to stay here and play in NZ. If his father is a Kiwi (he played for the Kiwis in league), he won't need to meet the residency requirement.

    Although born in Canberra, Lomax grew up playing league in Wellington, but switched to rugby when his family moved to Australia. He was named in Michael Cheika's' original 48 man Wallabies squad for 2017 before withdrawing.
    
    It's clear though that Lomax is determined to see out his career in New Zealand.
    
    "I decided this was where I wanted to play my rugby long term and decided to sign with  Ta$man and the Highlanders for the next few years.
    
    "This year at the Rebels was quite tough, really tough actually, but I took a lot from it and gained a lot of experience and got to play some good minutes.
    
    "I guess this is home, it's where I'm from and where all my family is and it's where my parents will end up in the next few years. It's just where I feel myself playing my rugby for hopefully the next 10 years."
    

    From another article:

     Ta$man Mako$ head coach Leon MacDonald noted Lomax's potential when explaining why he had opted to move back across the  Ta$man.
    
    "Even though he's young, his frame and attitude set him apart," MacDonald said.
    
    "He's aspiring to make the All Blacks and we are very proud that he sees  Ta$man as the pathway for him. For him to pack down alongside stalwarts like Tim Perry and Kane Hames is exciting for the future of  Ta$man rugby."
    

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/provincial/96745741/waiting-game-for-frustrated-tyrel-lomax-as-contract-negotiations-continue

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #2283

    @Stargazer He was a useful acquisition today.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #2284
    Injured All Blacks props Owen Franks and Joe Moody may not be seen in Super Rugby until May.
    
    Surgery to repair serious injuries means the pair must set aside six months to rehabilitate, although Crusaders coach Scott Robertson could extend that timeframe to guarantee they are in peak condition prior to returning to duty for the title holders.
    
    Franks recently had an operation on a troublesome Achilles tendon, while Moody went under the scalpel after damaging his shoulder during the All Blacks' 39-22 win over the Pumas in New Plymouth on September 9.
    
    "They are both in the six-month mark, but you also count a little bit of extra time [before they are back playing]," Robertson said. "So it could be around April or May, depending on their recovery.
    

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/97029679/crusaders-coach-scott-robertson-has-contracted-around-90-per-cent-of-squad-for-title-defence

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #2285
    Error 404
    Reducing the number of teams from 18 to 15 hasn't made finalising the Super Rugby draw any easier.
    
    Nor will it make the Kiwi teams any happier.
    
    That's the assessment of New Zealand Rugby chief executive Steve Tew, who revealed the draw is due to finally be released in days.
    
    Tew expects the five New Zealand teams will have the same concerns as always, notably around travel and the number of taxing derby matches, neither of which will dramatically change.
    
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #2286

    Full draw for 2018:

    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/5wrkll3ut8expry/AACVMUJ4IipeQjF3KrNUxSZFa?dl=0&preview=2018+Master+Super+Rugby+Draw.pdf

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #2287

    This time, the Lions have a harder draw. Let's see if they manage to finish first and host the final once again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #2288

    I guess they haven't announced how the playoff places will be determined?

    It would be far to easy for each team to play each other once, with the top eight teams going through ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #2289

    Unbelievable. The Crusaders have to play the Lions in Johannesburg again!

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #2290

    @stargazer At least it's not the Stormers in Cape Town.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #2291

    According to Gregor Paul:

    The three conference winners will automatically qualify for the playoffs but in 2018, unlike the last two years, the five wildcard places will go to the five teams with the most points.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11925046

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #2292

    @tim Yes, this is from another article:

    The winners of each conference qualify for the playoffs and will be joined by the five next-best teams, regardless of geography.
    

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/96747153/hurricanes-welcome-a-fairer-super-rugby-format-for-2018

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    wrote on last edited by
    #2293

    Last time we had a competition called The Super 15 the format was ok if my memory serves me correctly. Wonder why that same format was not adopted this time?

    StargazerS KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Higgins on last edited by
    #2294

    @higgins said in Super Rugby News:

    Last time we had a competition called The Super 15 the format was ok if my memory serves me correctly. Wonder why that same format was not adopted this time?

    It is almost the same. The only difference is that now 8 teams go through to the finals, while from 2011 to 2015, 6 teams qualified for the finals (with the two highest ranked teams not playing qualifiers/quarter finals).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Higgins on last edited by KiwiMurph
    #2295

    I believe franchises push for more local derbies because it means bigger crowds.

    Id also suggest more local derbies means higher ratings and given the broadcasters were willing to cut 3 teams for the same $ they would have demanded a return of more local derbies.

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #2296

    @kiwimurph Less travel too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Super Rugby News
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.