• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NZ v SA Test Series

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
606 Posts 48 Posters 72.8k Views
NZ v SA Test Series
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #394

    Appeasing the PC police never ends well. The people who aren't happy with Kuggeleijn being picked now, won't be happy in a year's time either. Chris you seem to be arguing that the people who don't want Kuggeleijn to be selected because of the rape trial are being irrational but we should listen to them anyway.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #395

    @hydro11 I don't think I've expressed a view on their rationality one way or the other.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #396

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    He's not innocent - he's not guilty - and it took two goes to get that verdict.

    By the same token he was tried twice and both times they failed to get a guilty verdict.

    Absolutely buy that a media shitstorm is going to ensue, but at the end of the day the national team should be selected on merit - it is a representative side. Being cleared on all charges this should be available for selection.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #397

    @rotated said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    He's not innocent - he's not guilty - and it took two goes to get that verdict.

    Being cleared on all charges this should be available for selection.

    So if Cairnsie was still in his hey-day, would you be happy if he was picked?

    HoorooH taniwharugbyT rotatedR 3 Replies Last reply
    5
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #398

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @rotated said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    He's not innocent - he's not guilty - and it took two goes to get that verdict.

    Being cleared on all charges this should be available for selection.

    So if Cairnsie was still in his hey-day, would you be happy if he was picked?

    Touché

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #399

    @Chris-B. B-Mac aint there, so be all good!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #400

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @hydro11 I don't think I've expressed a view on their rationality one way or the other.

    I assumed so because you haven't expressed any personal opposition to Kuggeleijn. The only reason you have given that he shouldn't be picked is because it gives NZC bad PR.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    wrote on last edited by Baron Silas Greenback
    #401

    Anyone protesting on this would need to be VERY careful. You cannot just hold up signs calling him a rapist or even imply it.
    Equally the media would need to water any comments extensively.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    wrote on last edited by
    #402

    What's the point of even having a justice system if someone can be accused of something, found not guilty, then still be restricted from doing their job (in this case pro cricket)?

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #403

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @rotated said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    He's not innocent - he's not guilty - and it took two goes to get that verdict.

    Being cleared on all charges this should be available for selection.

    So if Cairnsie was still in his hey-day, would you be happy if he was picked?

    All things being even - yes. It's a weird question though because Cairns' allegations direct relate to his performance on the field. So if Cairnsy was fixing games and underperforming I don't imagine he would have a strong case for selection.

    A better comparison would be Ryder who I have always maintained should be considered for selection and for a majority of the past decade he has been one of our best 6 batsmen. Even when blowing three times the legal limit he is top 10.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to rotated on last edited by canefan
    #404

    @rotated A sad indictment on our middle order that the guy three sheets to the wind would have walked into the side for most of that period

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to canefan on last edited by rotated
    #405

    @canefan said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @rotated A sad indictment on our middle order that the guy three sheets to the wind would have walked into the side for most of that period

    Several did probably judging by their performances.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #406

    @rotated said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @canefan said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @rotated A sad indictment on our middle order that the guy three sheets to the wind would have walked into the side for most of that period

    Several did probably judging by their performances.

    Some probably should have had a couple of beersies before heading out to the middle

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #407

    Quite a well balanced article about the Kuggeleijn selection in the Herald, written by Kris Shannon.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11825197

    Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #408

    @Gunner said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    Quite a well balanced article about the Kuggeleijn selection in the Herald, written by Kris Shannon.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11825197

    Disagree, that article has an underlying assumption that 'he got away' with something. The reference to the young girl who claimed she was raped is also dubious, court decided that she was not rape, her plight is not Kuggeliejns fault, it is mostly her own.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #409

    @Baron-Silas-Greenback fair enough, but I didn't pick that up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #410

    Appears like it'll be a test disrupted by weather.

    While not as bleak as the Richard De Groen days, I hold a realistic no hope for a win here. No miracle performances this time, we're lacking too many of our best players to beat these South Africans.

    Be nice to see a lot of fight and endeavour though

    SmudgeS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #411

    so looks like Kane lost the toss....SA elect to bat

    0_1490393426701_upload-170d99fe-cdc4-4c0a-9f8f-05dbf494271f

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #412

    @taniwharugby said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    so looks like Kane lost the toss....

    Unreal!
    I was so sure he was going to win this one I nearly bet the house on it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #413

    Henry nabs an early wicket, just to give us fans the usual glimmer of hope....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

NZ v SA Test Series
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.