Super Rugby News

[Duluth]

Almost no facts in this article about which Aussie team should go. But speculation about a merger:
Rebels confident, Brumbies in firing line

The Brumbies finances and those old fraud allegations should make them favourite to go. However, it would be a shame to throw away the 20+ year history. Maybe the Rebels organisation can take over the name? The Victorian Brumbies?

[antipodean]

@Duluth Practically everyone here is talking merger between Brumbies and Rebels.

[Tim]

Shouldn't they have a second side in Sydney? Based in North Sydney?

[antipodean]

@Tim If they had a second side in Sydney (which is South Randwick based in Southern NSW), then it should be in Western Sydney, where the talent is.

[hydro11]

@Tim said in Super Rugby News:

Shouldn't they have a second side in Sydney? Based in North Sydney?

It's about TV revenue and having a team there doesn't help to grow that pie.

[antipodean]

[MajorRage]

I don't even see why the Sunwolves were added. There is probably more money in the Japanese league than there is in super rugby as it is.

Unless JAL / ANA sponsored it.

[Chris B.]

@MajorRage Large potential TV audience in Japan if they can be persuaded to watch = big bucks for everyone else.

Sing along..."It's all about the money..it's all about the dum dum duddy dum dum.."

[Baron Silas Greenback]

This is the before and after pictures of Brad Webers injury....

Thats his femur

[mariner4life]

Yuuuuck

[Billy Tell]

...Brad Weber making a clean break from the game...

[antipodean]

@Baron-Silas-Greenback That's astonishing.

[Rembrandt]

Insane. I too have a broken femur..no where near as impressive as that though, no cast, no crutches just a sore knee and no chance of getting a seat on a crowded tram. It's amazing how quickly sports guys get back on their feet and into the game after that much damage.

[Crucial]

Let's hope that pin is adamantium.

[Stargazer]

As a red card automatically goes to the Foul Play Review Committee, expect a citing of Bulls' player Renaldo Bothma for this:

[antipodean]

@Stargazer I have no problem with that being a red card.

Having said that, I'm forming the opinion that we need to find a way that doesn't make the same penalty grossly different in impact depending on what stage of the game it applies.

[taniwharugby]

@antipodean maybe have another card, say and orange one, means he goes off for 10 mins and is automatically cited?

[Milk]

@taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

@antipodean maybe have another card, say and orange one, means he goes off for 10 mins and is automatically cited?

Perhaps the player can be replaced after 10 but the offender can't take the field again.

[Stargazer]

IMO the penalty should give some benefit to the team whose player was illegally tackled. In case of a red-card offence, 10 minutes is not enough to discourage players from committing these offences (even if a replacement player comes on after those 10 minutes like in that orange card idea) and doesn't benefit the opposing team enough.

I think the difference of when in the game a player is sent off (for the rest of the game) should be taken into account when the Foul Play Review Committee determines the punishment of a player who has been found guilty, not during the game by pulling a card with a different colour. Yellow and red should be enough. Add more colours (other than that blue card), and you'll still get discussions eventually. Before you know it, you'll have a rainbow.

[Frye]

Make it 20 and then you can be replaced.

That way it's still considerably worse than a yellow but wouldn't detriment a team too much if it happens early in the match.