• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Reds v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadersreds
83 Posts 26 Posters 9.4k Views
Reds v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by Tim
    #12

    All Blacks tighthead prop Owen Franks, along with test loosehead Wyatt Crockett who has been ill this week, has been given an early break and they remain in Christchurch, openside flanker Matt Todd won't be risked because he strained a calf in training and No 6 Jordan Taufua has been listed in the reserves.

    Not considered because of injury is last week's fullback David Havili, as is openside flanker Jed Brown who took a knock late in the match against the Highlanders. Heiden Bedwell-Curtis will debut for the Crusaders at No 7, while Pete Samu starts at blindside.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/90229352/crusaders-coach-scott-robertson-makes-seven-positional-changes-for-reds-match

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Very nice of Razor to pick a Reds legend as part of a team that should make for a competitive match.

    Do Razor and Digby have a break-dance-off at training?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    I'm very interested to see how Bedwell-Curtis will go at this level. Had a very good season for the Turbos in 2016.

    The omission of Crockett and Todd is understandable; not playing/starting Franks and Taufua gives the impression that they don't see the Reds as a serious opponent. I hope this is not going to be this year's banana skin ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Interesting choice to play Samu at 6 and Bedwell-Curtis at 7.

    I wonder if they've got that right? From what I know, both are really blindsides, but Samu is a bit smaller and pretty fast - and I'm pretty sure he played openside in the first game didn't he?

    Backs look good. Hopefully Razor rolling the dice with the forwards won't come back to bite us. There's a little bit o9f cavalry on the bench if we need it.

    TimT StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #16

    @Chris-B. Tamanivalu on the wing seems like a defensive weakness.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    This is super rugby. Defence is optional.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #18

    @Tim said in Reds v Crusaders:

    @Chris-B. Tamanivalu on the wing seems like a defensive weakness.

    Leon will have him knocked into shape by now - got rid of that lazy turn and chase that was OK with Dave Rennie. 🙂

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #19

    @Chris-B. "just tackle with your head son"

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by Stargazer
    #20

    @Chris-B. said in Reds v Crusaders:

    Interesting choice to play Samu at 6 and Bedwell-Curtis at 7.

    I wonder if they've got that right? From what I know, both are really blindsides, but Samu is a bit smaller and pretty fast - and I'm pretty sure he played openside in the first game didn't he?

    Backs look good. Hopefully Razor rolling the dice with the forwards won't come back to bite us. There's a little bit o9f cavalry on the bench if we need it.

    Bedwell-Curtis played almost all games for the Turbos at no. 8 and at least one at 6.
    Samu was a late injury replacement for Todd in round 1, hence playing openside, but like Bedwell-Curtis mostly played at no. 8 and a few times at 6 for Ta$man. Maybe Robertson concluded from the first game that Samu is not the best of the two at 7; who knows ...

    With both opensides Todd and Brown injured, at least one of the blindsides will have to play at 7. Taufua will cover all three positions from the bench. According to their Crusaders player profiles, Samu is 1.89m and B-C 1.88m.

    Edit: according to his Ta$man profile, Samu is 1.85m tall; the Turbos website gives B-C a height of 1.88m as well.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #21

    @mariner4life it's only the Reds...

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #22

    @ACT-Crusader bookmarked

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #23

    @Stargazer Bedwell-Curtis' mother must have written his wiki profile - that's got him at 1.94 m. 🙂

    boobooB MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #24

    @Chris-B. said in Reds v Crusaders:

    @Stargazer Bedwell-Curtis' mother must have written his wiki profile - that's got him at 1.94 m. 🙂

    Maybe he's got a fro?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #25

    @Chris-B. said in Reds v Crusaders:

    @Stargazer Bedwell-Curtis' mother must have written his wiki profile - that's got him at 1.94 m. 🙂

    Or @Canes4life has found someone other than Ardie Savea to pump?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Anyone reckon the Reds have a showing in this one.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to broughie on last edited by
    #27

    @broughie always...one of those teams that seems to drag others down if they are in a rut.

    broughieB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #28

    @taniwharugby I wanted to pick the Saders but the Reds forward pack is useful, its at Suncorp, they beat the Sharks and the Crusaders backs are meh especially without Moanga.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to broughie on last edited by Stargazer
    #29

    @broughie said in Reds v Crusaders:

    @taniwharugby I wanted to pick the Saders but the Reds forward pack is useful, its at Suncorp, they beat the Sharks and the Crusaders backs are meh especially without Moa'unga.

    Yes, a bit of a banana skin game. Like the Blues experienced last year with that draw.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #30

    @Stargazer actually the Reds did beat the Sharks.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #31

    @KiwiMurph Haha, yes, just edited my post. I confused them with the ponies.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Reds v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
crusadersreds
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.