• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Chiefs v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
blueschiefs
224 Posts 43 Posters 29.9k Views
Chiefs v Blues
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #211

    @taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Blues:

    0_1488748497305_Screenshot_2017-03-06-10-11-50.png

    Kaino should shut up and do his talking on the field.

    Was dopey as hell from Luatua

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #212

    Social media is full of muppets. I think his choice of words were poor.

    Looking at the logo he's a Ta$man supporter anyway! 🙄

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by taniwharugby
    #213

    @Bovidae yeah there is a tweet further down from Sumo

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    wrote on last edited by
    #214

    At first in real time, I thought it was a misread by luatua and he pulled out too late..
    When u see TNW coming in.. u just assume he's going to get the ball.. a good play by the chiefs
    TNW being short just made it worse for luatua

    OR he could've just tried to put a shoulder on the support runner.. only luatua knows lol

    Either way I don't think it was stupid.. some people just got way too emotional.. and I don't think they've ever faced that situation in a game theyve ever played in..

    These are split second decisions and it was just poor execution from luatua..

    It's not like he's a dirty player..

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • UncoU Offline
    UncoU Offline
    Unco
    wrote on last edited by
    #215

    Sure it was a split second decision but it was a pretty fucking reckless split second decision and as a result, pretty dumb. The 4 weeks was harsh and SANZAAR are clearly using him to set an example but I think it's a necessary evil. If they're ever going to drill it into players brains that they need to stay away from the head, they're going to have to be harsh. Judiciaries also need to be consistent, otherwise this is a complete waste of time.

    That said, the Twitter guy is still a fucking prick.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #216

    What it does mean is that Luatua and SBW are probably going to be returning about the same time, in about a month. Blues really need to stay in touch over that period which starts with almost a must win game this weekend (as it obviously is for the Highlanders too).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #217

    @taniwharugby Good response by Sumo. Twitter really is a collection of arsehats.

    @mimic said in Chiefs v Blues:

    At first in real time, I thought it was a misread by luatua and he pulled out too late..
    When u see TNW coming in.. u just assume he's going to get the ball.. a good play by the chiefs
    TNW being short just made it worse for luatua

    OR he could've just tried to put a shoulder on the support runner.. only luatua knows lol

    Either way I don't think it was stupid.. some people just got way too emotional.. and I don't think they've ever faced that situation in a game theyve ever played in..

    These are split second decisions and it was just poor execution from luatua..

    It's not like he's a dirty player..

    When I saw it I thought Luatua had been sold on TKB's dummy and thought TNW was going to ghost through the Blues defence again so he tackled him out of suspicion. I doubt he meant to hit him high, but he did and the resulting card was correct.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #218

    Its funny that people think four weeks is harsh but not the red. I would rather have Luatua out for four weeks and be able to replace him than not have him at all for 40 minutes.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #219

    @hydro11 said in Chiefs v Blues:

    Its funny that people think four weeks is harsh but not the red. I would rather have Luatua out for four weeks and be able to replace him than not have him at all for 40 minutes.

    Maybe - given the likelihood of many more cards being dished up - they need to revisit how the penalties work. e.g. a red card might mean you're allowed to replace the carded player with someone else after 10 minutes and the red carded player goes to the judiciary for further punishment.

    Even yellow cards there seem to be many more being handed out than three or four years ago - and many games are being decided on the back of them. E.g. Fair chance the Highlanders might have held on if Fekitoa didn't go to the bin. TV3 clip last night was suggesting Dagg could equally have gone to the bin for his challenge on Tevita Li, but didn't, and neither did whomever took Taufua out - which looked as bad as the Fekitoa/Havili one.

    I'd rather see games decided by scoring tries rather than not scoring yellow and red cards.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #220

    @Kirwan said in Chiefs v Blues:

    @SammyC said in Chiefs v Blues:

    Those starting locks for the blues looked like little shrimps next to Retalick and Bird.

    Blues totally smashed up front at set piece and breakdown. What the fuck has happened to Akira Ioane?

    He was one of the most dynamic and involved players in the NPC last year. Now he stands around in the midfield waiting for someone to pass him the ball.

    Why does Auckland rugby (and the Warriors) do this to promising players so consistently? (Turn them into lazy slobs)

    It's more people judging players unfairly. Because Akira is a bit niggly (no worse than Brodie) people seem to enjoy getting stuck into him.

    The stats just don't bear out any accusations of laziness.

    Dropped by Umaga from this weeks match "due to poor work rate against the Chiefs"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by
    #221
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #222

    @Chris-B. Suggest you take a look at customer is always right thread. I like the idea of double yellow (player off but after 10 a replacement can come on) in cases where a clumsy tackle or jump leads to a mandatory card but not malicious and so ought not to be a red. For me double yellows wouldn't lead to subsequent ban.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #223
    This post is deleted!
    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #224
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Chiefs v Blues
Rugby Matches
blueschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.