Chappell-Hadlee
-
@Damo said in Chappell-Hadlee:
These two are bowling well and are keeping the runs down, but I wonder if we should get Boult or Southee back to try and take a wicket while the pressure is on. As well as Williamson is bowling, we are perhaps just letting Stoinos get established at the crease.
It's a toss up between getting through some cheap overs while they are getting set, or trying to blast out a few more wickets. If we had 330 on the board then cheap overs works, but 280 I prefer we attack.
-
-
Number 1 ODI bowler gets Head, crucial wicket as they'd just started upping the rate.
Really really really really need fucking Soines ASAP.
-
Aaannnnd the number 1 ODI bowler gets Faulkner too!
Did I mention he's the number 1 ODI bowler?
Oh yeah!
-
Deja vu anyone
-
-
Even better as Faulkner is a complete fuckwit
-
-
@No-Quarter said in Chappell-Hadlee:
@Virgil said in Chappell-Hadlee:
Deja vu anyone
Bring on Neesh!
Shut UP @No-Quarter
-
@Damo said in Chappell-Hadlee:
WASP has Aus at 10% but I think that's too low. 33% is about right IMO. The issue is that they only need basically a run a ball for 17 overs. We didn't score enough to make this safe even 6 down.
If we don't get Stoines we lose is what it boils down too. The kid is on fire.
-
Fuck yes
-
@No-Quarter Does the reverse apply? Do we win now that we've got him?
I think there's still plenty of fight left in this one. 80 odd over 11 overs is stuff all these days.
-
Got em fuck off you tinny fuck
-
Fair play to Santner he's been bloody outstanding with the ball this series.
-
@Damo said in Chappell-Hadlee:
@No-Quarter Does the reverse apply? Do we win now that we've got him?
I think there's still plenty of fight left in this one. 80 odd over 11 overs is stuff all these days.
The reverse is that we have a chance! Cummins and Starc can both hold a bat so we still need to bowl them out.
-
Hold onto your hats lads Neesh is on.
