• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby News

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
5.2k Posts 139 Posters 1.4m Views
Super Rugby News
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #1104

    @Billy-Tell said in Super Rugby News:

    @Billy-Tell said in Super Rugby News:

    Really sad news. Wasting a career. I sort of hope it was recreational drugs and not cheating drugs.

    Herald saying cheating drugs. In that case good riddance.

    It doesn't say that, plus Herald has been known to get things wrong, so I'll await finding out more before I hang him.

    Billy TellB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1105

    @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

    @Billy-Tell said in Super Rugby News:

    @Billy-Tell said in Super Rugby News:

    Really sad news. Wasting a career. I sort of hope it was recreational drugs and not cheating drugs.

    Herald saying cheating drugs. In that case good riddance.

    It doesn't say that, plus Herald has been known to get things wrong, so I'll await finding out more before I hang him.

    It says performance enhancing drugs. They're not talking about viagra here.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #1106

    @Billy-Tell doesn't say that either.

    Tuipulotu is not thought to have used recreational drugs.

    Yes you can take from that it means performance enhancing, but maybe it was medicated?

    I am happy to leave judgement until all is known.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Do not disturb
    V Do not disturb
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #1107

    Left an All Blacks tour early, not available for the start of the Super rugby season, no one knows when or even if he will be playing again.

    Doesn't look good!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1108

    @taniwharugby

    Stuff were saying it was personal, and applying for exemption on compassionate grounds. Sounds like there is more to come on this - don't rush to judgement.

    B sample results apparently not yet back either -w hich is a weirdly long time. He has also been in and around the Blues, so if it was PED then you'd hope they shitcanned him and barred him from the team.

    Sad however this turns out.

    Billy TellB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #1109

    @nzzp said in Super Rugby News:

    @taniwharugby

    Stuff were saying it was personal, and applying for exemption on compassionate grounds. Sounds like there is more to come on this - don't rush to judgement.

    B sample results apparently not yet back either -w hich is a weirdly long time. He has also been in and around the Blues, so if it was PED then you'd hope they shitcanned him and barred him from the team.

    Sad however this turns out.

    How can you take PEDs on compassionate grounds?

    I guess I wait and see what evolves but if he's let off for PEDs the rest of the rugby world will go to town on it.

    nzzpN rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #1110

    @Billy-Tell said in Super Rugby News:

    How can you take PEDs on compassionate grounds?

    Drugs on the banned list may not be PED.

    I think dope and cocaine are on there. Not sure either would actually help you play better at the top level.

    as you say, wait and see...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #1111

    It sounds more likely that it's a fuckup with something he took while rehabbing. The statement about the b sample seems very odd but maybe there is an argument regarding the a sample to start with

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #1112

    @Billy-Tell said in Super Rugby News:

    I guess I wait and see what evolves but if he's let off for PEDs the rest of the rugby world will go to town on it.

    They shouldn't based on the Chilliboy/Basson exoneration - but as he had a black jersey on briefly it will no doubt.

    I guess we will see what comes out in the wash but it's hard to think of anything that could possibly be so personal to the point where everyone has gone dark on it. Literally the only thing I could think of would be something pertaining to hormones.

    The fact he hasn't requested for his B sample be tested is not a good sign. Unless it truly is truly something bizzare/unfortunate Hansen and co should have come out and said it from the jump - especially if Patrick is not disputing that he took it.

    JCJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #1113

    thing is, if there is any medical reasons for prescribed steroids or similar, the NZRU medical team should have known about it, and would surely have applied for an exemption or done whatever they need to do to prevent it getting to this, although I guess he could have seen a Dr. outside of the NZRU, but again, if he has prescribed something surely knowing who PT is (as a Dr. would I expect as part of the process of finding out about, job, family history etc) advise him what is being prescribed is a banned substance.

    It certainly doesnt sound very good at all, hopefully there is a reasonable explanation, but I suspect we are unlikely to find out much leaving everyone to speculate.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #1114

    @rotated yeah, that was my thought too. Some kind of treatment for reduced fertility without even giving a thought to the consequences for PED tests. If that was the case then poor bugger, a choice between your sport / livelihood and having a family is not a position anyone would wish for.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1115

    @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

    It certainly doesnt sound very good at all, hopefully there is a reasonable explanation, but I suspect we are unlikely to find out much leaving everyone to speculate.

    When he gets a ban or a hearing is scheduled, we'll find out. That is public I understand

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to nzzp on last edited by taniwharugby
    #1116

    @nzzp dunno if it is that straight forward, unless he has also broken the law, if it is an employment issue, and one that relates to some personal issue and something prescribed by his Dr, unless he wants it released, we may not find out.

    Yes he may get a ban, yes he may lose his NZR contract, but doesnt mean we will find out what or why he took what he did.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1117

    @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

    @nzzp dunno if it is that straight forward, unless he has also broken the law, if it is an employment issue, and one that relates to some personal issue and something prescribed by his Dr, unless he wants it released, we may not find out.

    Yes he may get a ban, yes he may lose his NZR contract, but doesnt mean we will find out what or why he took what he did.

    Doesn't it get taken away from NZRugby if they test positive?

    Some itneresting case histories here:

    Therapeutic Use Exemptions | Sport Integrity Commission
    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #1118

    more info here:

    Report doping in sport | Sport Integrity Commission

    Further to these sanctions, an athlete who has been found guilty of an Anti-Doping Rule Violation is often exposed to a level of media attention that can result in permanent damage to their reputation. This can mean stories on the TV news, in newspapers, on social media such as Facebook and Twitter which, in cases of deliberate cheating, could lead to you being the subject of public contempt.

    Looks like Rugby is on the list, so they are doing the testing for the NZRU. So should be public once the test is positive

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #1119

    Rugby union related anti-doping decisions (not necessarily the procedures) are public and published here:
    http://nzrugby.co.nz/what-we-do/regulations/anti-doping
    This list doesn't look up-to-date.

    Decisions relating to other sports (including rugby league) are published here: http://www.sportstribunal.org.nz/decisions/all-decisions/search

    The applicable anti-doping rules:

    Sports Anti–Doping Rules 2017 (pdf)
    NZ Rugby Union Anti-Doping Regulations 2012 (pdf)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #1120

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #1121

    Wonder why that release is out now, when they knew in November.

    Not impressed.

    MN5M rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #1122

    @nzzp said in Super Rugby News:

    Wonder why that release is out now, when they knew in November.

    Not impressed.

    Media get shit for releasing stories early based on heresay just for a few clicks then get shit for releasing something far too late for @nzzps liking. They just can't win.

    antipodeanA nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1123

    @MN5 said in Super Rugby News:

    @nzzp said in Super Rugby News:

    Wonder why that release is out now, when they knew in November.

    Not impressed.

    Media get shit for releasing stories early based on heresay just for a few clicks then get shit for releasing something far too late for @nzzps liking. They just can't win.

    The media isn't releasing anything here. It's a joint statement by the union and player's association about something they were aware of months ago. They've released this statement because a media outlet has reported it. What bit of that confuses you?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    3

Super Rugby News
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.