• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
346 Posts 39 Posters 11.9k Views
Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by Machpants
    #324

    Pretty much agree with Gregor's opening point

    Let’s get this straight: on Thursday Auckland Council voted in favour of redeveloping a stadium it doesn’t own or manage on the basis the city needs a state-of-the-art facility, and the country a national venue to attract the best sport and entertainment.But the council doesn’t want to pay money towards redeveloping it and says it doesn’t have any. The Government is also suggesting it too doesn’t want to contribute the $100 million Eden Park needs to begin its upgrade that it says will cost $546m in total, but others say will be closer to $1 billion.On top of that, you have a national sports body in New Zealand Rugby, which has openly declared – through its support for the Quay Park bid – that it does not want Eden Park to be the national stadium, and had ambition and desire to see the All Blacks play in a contemporary, larger venue that aligns more with their brand values and commercial aspirations.

    Frankly, it’s hard to tell how this situation could be any less inspiring or underwhelming, as what Auckland Council voted for was precisely nothing – a prolonged stalemate over stadium development that will last until bits of Eden Park are literally falling off, which will force one body – probably the government – to reluctantly provide the cash for the urgent maintenance work.

    Gregor Paul: Eden Park decision is bad news for All Blacks fans

    As the RFU put it, quite pithily, 'if you want more money, build your own stadium'. Well NZR are never going to be able to build from scratch, but as partners in a bigger venture, they would've been in a much better place than paying money 'too much, had been hinted before' to a third party

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #325

    The councillors comments about the vote sums up the situation (see video)..

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360631753/eden-park-revamp-gets-backing-over-new-waterfront-stadium

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Machpants on last edited by Tim
    #326

    @Machpants NZ is never going to have a national stadium (where all home tests are played) either, so it seems even less likely.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    WestieFella
    wrote on last edited by WestieFella
    #327

    A quick Google tells me EP is currently the world's smallest cricket ground with a 55 metre straight boundary. Whereas the basin reserve boundary is between 137 and 150 metres.

    I wonder what would the new dimensions of EP be with the retractable seating? Does it bring it up to test standards?

    Currently EP is not test standard, but it was awarded test status before the minimum boundary length was brought in, so that's how EP gets test cricket.

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to WestieFella on last edited by
    #328

    @WestieFella said in Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc:

    A quick Google tells me EP is currently the world's smallest cricket ground with a 55 metre straight boundary. Whereas the basin reserve boundary is between 137 and 150 metres.

    Those comparisons aren't apples and apples.

    A 55m boundary is from the stumps to the boundary. So an edge just needs to go 55m and a straight hit is 75m::
    55m plus 20m for the length of the pitch.

    The Basin straight is about 65m

    Caketin is about 60m in all directions.

    These are with the ropes and electronic signage pushing them in a few meters.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    WestieFella
    wrote on last edited by
    #329

    Ok, so will EP now be a decent cricket ground with the retractable seating in the upgrade?
    From the illustrations it actually looks like it could be a very good cricket ground.
    I hope they also do something with the west stand, like make it connect to the north and south stands so it's just one continuous stand. It doesn't need to go as high as the north and south. It always looks odd especially with the gaps either side of it.
    But I can still remember the old old west stand and the members stand, and while that corner has improved it's still looks out of place.
    I'm always sceptical of the artist impressions of buildings, cause the end result seldom looks like the impressions...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #330

    I actually think my explanation of the 55m boundary is wrong.

    To the eye, I think the straight boundaries are only about 50m.

    I think 55m (that is being used) is half of the straight diameter. Which from a cricketing pov is the centre of the pitch and a totally useless starting point.

    The ICC minimum is 55m, and Eden Park doesn't conform, but has an exemption.

    I can't think of any ground in the world that even gets close to the 55m minimum, though. Seddon Park is probably next smallest in the world at about 58/59m straight.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #331

    The retractable seating in the southern stand adds 10m to the boundary length.

    So, if they repeated that standard in a new northern stand. You'd add 5m to each straight boundary and reach the ICC minimum of 55m each way. Which would still be shit IMO. (Or 60m each way from centre of the pitch.)

    However. At 60m each way from the centre. You now have an option to reorient the pitch along the length of the rugby orientation. Without it being too ridiculous. Basically that is McLean Park sized square boundaries.

    The diameter of the current square boundaries at Eden Park are 128m. So, they would already be acceptable as straight boundaries . There is also an extra 5m that can be added now that lower tier of western stand has been demolished and is presumably going to be temporary/retractable going forward.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #332

    So. In summary.

    Eden Paek 2.0 would still likely be a joke by 5m in each straight direction in current orientation. Despite likely lengthening by 5m each way.

    But an Eden Park 2.0 with the orientation flipped 90 degrees would be OK.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #333

    @Rapido the expensive seats and corporate are north and south, and the sun goes east west.

    So I can't see a realignment happening

    RapidoR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #334

    @nzzp said in Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc:

    @Rapido the expensive seats and corporate are north and south, and the sun goes east west.

    So I can't see a realignment happening

    I also think it unlikely.

    They are quite (demonstrably) comfortable with shit dimensions.

    The East-West orientation and sunsets is a real thing for cricket grounds, I agree. But isually not when the ground is a full stadium with building heights no longer making it an issue. Although it would require modeling.

    McLean Park (which has a SW orientation) has that issue, where a gap in the stands at exactly due west, causes problems at sunset at certain parts of the summer.

    Eden Park orientation is very slightly WNW.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #335

    @nzzp said in Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc:

    @Rapido the expensive seats and corporate are north and south

    For this part.

    Taking Eden Park 2.0 irenders n good faith .... I'm expecting covered seating at least at one end, if not both.

    I don't expect corporate at either end though, they would remain square.

    That would be Adelaide Oval equivalent.

    Rare, but not unknown or unsuccessful.

    I would expect a corporate lounge oriented side-on that, but at a ground that actually hosts test matches again, so increases cricket days at the stadium by about 200 to 300%, to be of more value than the status quo of about 4 days use per summer.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #336

    I remember when the West stand was the best stand in the ground.

    This is from the document that went to Council and illustrates why Eden Park 2.0 was the only choice, albeit the reality any redevelopment has been kicked down the road.

    image.png

    The Waterfront Stadium was, (as always thought) pretty renders and not much else

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mikedogzM Online
    mikedogzM Online
    mikedogz
    wrote on last edited by
    #337

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/360667337/auckland-fc-home-base-tataki-auckland-unlimiteds-preferred-option-western-springs-stadium

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to mikedogz on last edited by Duluth
    #338

    @mikedogz said in Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/360667337/auckland-fc-home-base-tataki-auckland-unlimiteds-preferred-option-western-springs-stadium

    I presume the lack of seating behind one of the goals is so they can have a concert stage go there.

    Would be better if there was a stand behind that goal and the field moved back. Then a smaller concourse linking to the existing terraces

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #339

    I see Eden Park released a video about the 3 stages. After a minute of fluff there is some details on distances in the different configurations

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #340

    @Duluth said in Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc:

    @mikedogz said in Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/360667337/auckland-fc-home-base-tataki-auckland-unlimiteds-preferred-option-western-springs-stadium

    I presume they lack of seating behind one of the goals is so they can have a concert stage go there.

    Would be better if there was a stand behind that goal and the field moved back. Then a smaller concourse linking to the existing terraces

    I do like the KOP like stand behind the goal…but am I missing something, with that huge concourse people sitting in the first few rows won’t see any/most of the pitch….

    M RapidoR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by Machpants
    #341

    @Kiwiwomble said in Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc:

    @Duluth said in Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc:

    @mikedogz said in Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/360667337/auckland-fc-home-base-tataki-auckland-unlimiteds-preferred-option-western-springs-stadium

    I presume they lack of seating behind one of the goals is so they can have a concert stage go there.

    Would be better if there was a stand behind that goal and the field moved back. Then a smaller concourse linking to the existing terraces

    I do like the KOP like stand behind the goal…but am I missing something, with that huge concourse people sitting in the first few rows won’t see any/most of the pitch….

    And the top rows will be miles away from the field

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #342

    @Duluth said in Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc:

    I see Eden Park released a video about the 3 stages. After a minute of fluff there is some details on distances in the different configurations

    Looks good. Soooooooooooooo, where's the money coming from?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #343
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Auckland stadiums - Eden Park, Western Springs etc
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.