• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

New Mitre 10 Cup laws

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
94 Posts 35 Posters 12.6k Views
New Mitre 10 Cup laws
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #65

    I think it has made the breakdown messier, and the quality of service form the 9's has decreased as often they will rush his delivery to ensure the ball doesn't get kicked away or it gets kicked away.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    It has also taken a big chunk of the contest out of the game - which is one of the key principles of rugby, a contest for possession - retaining possession is way too easy now and it is very hard for the defensive side to force a turnover. It's almost turning into League but without the tackle count.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by KiwiMurph
    #67

    Looks like the new laws are likely to be carried through to Super Rugby - at least in some form - hopefully if so there are some tweaks to the Mitre 10 Cup version.

    Interesting comments by SANZAAR Game Manager Lyndon Bray (bit of a weird title?). Encouraging that some of the comments talked about here are mentioned by Bray, around the messiness and contest.

    ***The prevailing issue is to what extent is the contest still on the tackle, and if you've watched a bit of [Mitre 10 Cup] you can see how hard it is to get in and actually win the ball," SANZAAR Game Manager Lyndon Bray told an Australian media briefing recently.

    "And we want to protect a little bit of that contest. At the same time the balance is making sure the attack team has got confidence to play.

    "So I really like some of it, and I think our view going through to World Rugby, which will look at all of that in November from a decision-making point of view [is] what might it look like going forward; I think those two things, the tackler and [having] the offside line as early as possible in the breakdown -- and maybe therefore redefine that a ruck starts with one player rather than two -- that's working well, but [also] maintaining the contest.

    "Because I think in the southern hemisphere, one of our strengths, in all our core markets, is our ability to get on the ball -- and that gives us a real point of difference if you look across world rugby. So I think that's a key factor that we want to maintain."

    "I think there's two key things that have come out of Mitre 10 [Cup], as a total package, [we're] not sure that the whole experimental law is right," Bray said.

    "But the issue around the tackler and his special rights we have in law, getting rid of that and making him forced to get out of the game and come back round like everyone else and [abide by] offside line at the breakdown, all of that is trying to get the support players of the attack team up off the ground.

    "So in the traditional game we've got very accepting of guys in effect driving on the tackler who's on the ground, and that's what we're trying to get out of the game so that you can speed up the flow of the ball, whether that's attacking team or turnover.

    "So we were really clear last week that we want to maintain the man-on-feet defender having a strength of contest, we think that's critical. So there's some really good points to come out of it.***

    SANZAAR wants to protect 'little bit' of tackle contest

    SANZAAR wants to protect 'little bit' of tackle contest

    Fetchers such as David Pocock are breathing a sigh of relief with SANZAAR indicating its hesitance at a potential rule change that would make their key skill irrelevant.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #68

    @KiwiMurph said in New Mitre 10 Cup laws:

    It has also taken a big chunk of the contest out of the game - which is one of the key principles of rugby, a contest for possession - retaining possession is way too easy now and it is very hard for the defensive side to force a turnover. It's almost turning into League but without the tackle count.

    I expect while there maybe less turnovers, the team in possession are often scrambling back to get a ball that has been kicked through, so while not a turnover, the opposition has disrupted things.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #69

    @Stargazer
    I agree with a lot of Dowd's article. Except for putting the ball under the prop's feet. Seriously?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86
    wrote on last edited by
    #70

    I'd have the shits if we were playing different breakdown interpretations than the ones we have to play under at end of year NH tour. From what I've seen of the Mitre 10 cup teams who did not use those laws in club rugby, it is not just something you can easily adapt to, so I assume the same would happen in reverse, going back to the old rules after using the new ones for 6 months of a Super/Rugby Championship tournament

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #71

    Sumo's take

    Given the cold reception to the new laws from World Rugby last week, it looks as if they will not make it past the trial stage. They have not led to a sudden surge in tries (although Week 6 did produce the most of any round this year, with 62), they have not led to a clearer picture for the referee, given penalty percentages have remained static, and they have led to a significant reduction in turnover ball, which goes against the spirit of the game.

    Scotty Stevenson  /  Sep 27, 2016  /  Sports

    Breaking down the breakdown: Why the new laws being trialled are getting the thumbs down

    Breaking down the breakdown: Why the new laws being trialled are getting the thumbs down

    The new breakdown laws currently being trialled in the Mitre 10 Cup have found little favour with World Rugby’s law committee, according to sources close to the latest meeting. Scotty Stevenson assesses their impact on the numbers after six weeks of competition.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by
    #72

    I hope the new laws get binned. They have reduced my enjoyment of the NPC this year. The rucks just look weird to me, like nobody knows what the hell is going on.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #73

    @KiwiMurph said in New Mitre 10 Cup laws:

    Sumo's take

    Given the cold reception to the new laws from World Rugby last week, it looks as if they will not make it past the trial stage. They have not led to a sudden surge in tries (although Week 6 did produce the most of any round this year, with 62), they have not led to a clearer picture for the referee, given penalty percentages have remained static, and they have led to a significant reduction in turnover ball, which goes against the spirit of the game.

    Scotty Stevenson  /  Sep 27, 2016  /  Sports

    Breaking down the breakdown: Why the new laws being trialled are getting the thumbs down

    Breaking down the breakdown: Why the new laws being trialled are getting the thumbs down

    The new breakdown laws currently being trialled in the Mitre 10 Cup have found little favour with World Rugby’s law committee, according to sources close to the latest meeting. Scotty Stevenson assesses their impact on the numbers after six weeks of competition.

    well, that's it then. If an experiment has failed to deliver the stated aims, it has failed, and so bin it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #74

    when I saw them in week 1 I thought they sucked, but maybe it's just the guys getting used to them...alas, nope, still messy as a messy thing!

    Funnily after all the gnashing about rucks and other things over the past couple of seasons, I reckon rugby seems to be going pretty well at the moment with the rules, the interpretation of them aside, I think the less tinkering the better!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #75

    I would still maintain that most of the issues at ruck time are caused by players going off their feet. Yes, the game has sped up enormously and players arriving at breakdowns at speed are always going to lose a bit of accuracy but surely enforcing shoulders above hips more would clean things up a bit?
    As Bart says "plane taking off not plane landing"
    These trial laws make things just a bit too messy. What you want to encourage is packs forming over a ball making an impromptu scrum and driving over to clear. Big ask.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #76

    Question - does anyone know what the tiebreakers are when teams are tied on points?

    The official Mitre10 site presently has Ta$man listed above Auckland - presumably because they have five wins to Auckland's four. Ta$man has a worse points difference.

    But Wikipedia says...

    When teams are level on log points, they are sorted by:
    the winner of the round robin match between the two provinces
    highest overall points difference
    highest number of tries scored
    highest number of points scored
    a coin toss

    I can't find another reference in a casual search.

    mimicM G 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #77

    @Chris-B. In the Auckland game, Sky put up a table that had Auckland ahead of Ta$man..
    So someone has it wrong..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #78

    @Chris-B. said in New Mitre 10 Cup laws:

    Question - does anyone know what the tiebreakers are when teams are tied on points?

    The official Mitre10 site presently has Ta$man listed above Auckland - presumably because they have five wins to Auckland's four. Ta$man has a worse points difference.

    But Wikipedia says...

    When teams are level on log points, they are sorted by:
    the winner of the round robin match between the two provinces
    highest overall points difference
    highest number of tries scored
    highest number of points scored
    a coin toss

    I can't find another reference in a casual search.

    http://www.mitre10cup.co.nz/News/28264/itm-cup-tie-breaks-and-cheer-guide

    Last year's tie breaks - Wikipedia is right based on that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #79

    The running and general skill on display has been great to watch this season, but I am hating the breakdown. I still find myself waiting for tacklers to get to their feet to compete for the ball because they have rights. But no, that has gone and we end up with a bunch of guys using their feet to disrupt the ball. It's just messy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #80

    Wynne Gray on the experimental laws
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wynne-gray/news/article.cfm?a_id=23&objectid=11724776

    This is the relevant section:

    What's fair about tacklers being told by the ref to release opponents who then almost get up, might release the ball for a microsecond and then continue to crawl, run or roll up field?
    
    As much as anyone, I loathe laws at test and Super Rugby level which allow players to charge into the breakdowns at an angle and clean out defenceless rivals. More players do go to those rucks, however, and have a chance of turning over possession - but not in the NPC.
    
    How does rugby attract more players to rucks and give them and spectators a chance to understand the rules? It's as easy as Banks' kicking style.
    
    As soon as the tackler and his victim hit the ground, they are out of play and cannot touch the ball. You can't place it, push it, hatch it, squeeze it or do any of the stalling tactics encouraged at the moment.
    
    The ball is the offside line and it should be open slather for anyone wanting to grab it or heel it back, as long as they stay on their feet. We want a contest at the breakdown, we want to keep magnificent specialist No7s in the game but, right now, rucks are a dodgy lottery encouraging utility loose forwards
    

    The new laws suck and I'm sure they won't be adopted. However if they are about safety I suspect we'll seem some different experiments soon

    I think Wynn Gray makes a good point in that article about being strict on the tackler but not the tackled player. By being strict on both, turnovers should become easier. It should also force the attacking side to commit more numbers.

    I don't mind Dowd's suggestion either - players can only play the backwards with their foot at a breakdown. No more hacking it forward.

    Another thing I would like to see in future is cleaning up the 'not held' rulings where the player gets up and goes again. Whether a players is held is becoming very subjective and in many cases unfair to the defence.
    Perhaps the players should have to release the ball if they are brought to ground by an incomplete tackle too?

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #81

    @Duluth I don't mind a little more leeway given to the attacking player, as it gives teams confidence to take the tackle knowing there is a good chance they will recycle. I would be loath to make it too easy to turn the ball over, as we will revert to teams kicking more ball away rather than risk turnovers.

    I also like defending teams having to commit numbers to turn the ball over, as then it becomes risk/reward, and can open the field up. If you have a good chance to disrupt/steal with only one person, then there are a lot of advantages to the defense again.

    Personally I think the balance is right at Super and Test level, and i really don't understand why there are experiments for change.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #82

    @mariner4life said in New Mitre 10 Cup laws:

    Personally I think the balance is right at Super and Test level, and i really don't understand why there are experiments for change.

    Well they have said one of the main concerns is safety. They seem worried about a jackal being in a vulnerable position getting smashed.
    If the RIB is determined to get that out of the game the current laws will not last long

    My comments about the attacking team having too much leeway only relate to the NPC laws.. not the current laws.
    I agree the balance at Test rugby is quite good right now. The balance in these NPC laws is shite.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #83

    @Duluth of course he's vulnerable, that's why stealing ball is a skill, and takes bravery (and why my neck is fucked). As long as refs are hard on the guys diving in like Lood on the weekend, then it should be all good.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #84

    @mariner4life

    Yeah I don't disagree with that

    When I read the IRB is concerned about 'safety' I assume they are concerned about legal liability, panics leading to bans in some places etc etc
    I suspect the IRB has already decided there will be a change to the breakdown, but they just haven't decided what (because the NPC laws have failed)

    I am skeptical any effort to keep players on their feet at the breakdown can work without a return to rucking.
    Maybe that should be an experiment? Play a one off, decent quality game, with the breakdown ruled like it was ~20 years ago

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0

New Mitre 10 Cup laws
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.