• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NRL 2025

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
leaguewarriors
1.0k Posts 41 Posters 26.4k Views
NRL 2025
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by Gunner
    #178

    I get that 6 again, after Wayde deliberately got held down after that break…
    However that’s a professional foul, shouldn’t it be a penalty and sin bin?

    Confused.

    Anyway Wayde scores a couple of tackles later.

    Or does he, NRL? Probably not…

    Edit. Try awarded.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #179

    Commentators were carrying on like dickheads for the Saab try. They were essentially saying it was inconclusive but he likely scored before the bunker got involved, then when the bunker said the same thing they had a melt down at them.

    Then silence for the Egan (no) try.

    Was pleasantly surprised when I switched over from the rugby. The Saab scored and I thought I was the jinx. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #180

    Inconclusive will be the call from the bunker.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StagS Offline
    StagS Offline
    Stag
    wrote on last edited by
    #181

    RTS has gifted everything to Manly so far, he has been terrible on the wing, every point has been scored through his horrendous defence and mistakes.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #182

    @antipodean said in NRL 2025:

    Inconclusive will be the call from the bunker.

    Well at least they're being consistent. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Stag on last edited by
    #183

    @Stag co he’s a fullback, not a winger.

    Criminal he’s not playing there.

    Nothing against CNK, but RTS is just the more dangerous fullback.

    antipodeanA StagS 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #184

    I think we miss Rocco Berrys defence too, hopefully he got through the reserves game today and is a chance to play NRL next week.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #185

    @Gunner it's genius level coaching to move a bloke in the twilight of his career onto the wing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #186

    @Gunner said in NRL 2025:

    I think we miss Rocco Berrys defence too, hopefully he got through the reserves game today and is a chance to play NRL next week.

    He doesn't move he. Industrious but lacking impact

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StagS Offline
    StagS Offline
    Stag
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #187

    @Gunner I totally areee, on the flip side Egan has been outstanding.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #188

    @canefan said in NRL 2025:

    @Gunner said in NRL 2025:

    I think we miss Rocco Berrys defence too, hopefully he got through the reserves game today and is a chance to play NRL next week.

    He doesn't move he. Industrious but lacking impact

    As opposed to the very limited Pompey?

    I think Berry has been really good in the last couple of seasons and would have him in front of Pompey by a mile.

    As I type, the Warriors show a lack of composure on attack and turn it over in great field position.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #189

    What knock on am I missing? It seems inconclusive means not enough evidence to rule in Warrior's favour.

    canefanC G 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #190

    I was watching the Canes, I won't risk turning the channel over and jinxing the boys, they need all the good juju they can get

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #191

    @antipodean said in NRL 2025:

    What knock on am I missing? It seems inconclusive means not enough evidence to rule in Warrior's favour.

    We always get a raw deal

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #192

    @antipodean said in NRL 2025:

    What knock on am I missing? It seems inconclusive means not enough evidence to rule in Warrior's favour.

    The knock on that went half a metre backwards… that he didn’t even touch.

    Come on, it’s pretty straight forward

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #193

    Warriors have got to score here while Manly have a man in the bin, I don’t want this going down to the wire.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #194

    Rogerrrrrrr!!!!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #195

    @canefan said in NRL 2025:

    @antipodean said in NRL 2025:

    What knock on am I missing? It seems inconclusive means not enough evidence to rule in Warrior's favour.

    We always get a raw deal

    This is historically true, but we have benefited from this interpretation tonight too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #196

    @Gunner said in NRL 2025:

    Warriors have got to score here while Manly have a man in the bin, I don’t want this going down to the wire.

    This is the Wahs we're talking about right? It always goes unnecessarily down to the wire!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #197

    That’s an important 2 from Metcalf.

    30-16 with 8 to play.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

NRL 2025
Sports Talk
leaguewarriors
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.