-
@nzzp said in NZ Politics:
@Kirwan said in NZ Politics:
https://www.reddit.com/r/auckland/comments/12k4cnr/make_auckland_great_again/
Some great zingers in this supercut.
that's a bloke in his last job just not giving a shit. Classic. Clearly an Engineer and not interested in building emotional bridges, just actual ones.
Remains to be seen if anything changes though. His line on CCO was gold 'council controlling organisations' was quality
Kudos to him for getting exactly right that Eric Sykes meets Hitler look.
'Greelane' is great, I'm going to start calling it Gleelane from now on. -
Jesus wept. They can't pay the teachers they have. And they are only promising class numbers to drop by one. By 2025. Which they won't achieve even if they keep power
-
Labour minister gets attack of foot in mouth disease to take heat off outgoing Green MP
-
@canefan Dumb shit from Kiri Allan. I get she was going in to bat for her partner but how naive can you be.
Also reeks of a monumental dummy spit by Allan on behalf of Mani Dunlop.
She didn't get the gig to host Morning Report. Obviously for an ambitious journo that's going to be a disappointment, but you started as an intern (as recently as 2011) and are heading the stations flagship Midday Report Hour at midday.
By definition the higher you go in any organisation the more limited the opportunities. There are only two hosts of Morning Report and plenty of talent after them. National Radio is probably the last mainstream media outlet you could accuse of not promoting Maoritanga. What did they want tokenism?
-
@dogmeat said in NZ Politics:
@canefan Dumb shit from Kiri Allan. I get she was going in to bat for her partner but how naive can you be.
Also reeks of a monumental dummy spit by Allan on behalf of Mani Dunlop.
She didn't get the gig to host Morning Report. Obviously for an ambitious journo that's going to be a disappointment, but you started as an intern (as recently as 2011) and are heading the stations flagship Midday Report Hour at midday.
By definition the higher you go in any organisation the more limited the opportunities. There are only two hosts of Morning Report and plenty of talent after them. National Radio is probably the last mainstream media outlet you could accuse of not promoting Maoritanga. What did they want tokenism?
Yes
-
Any thoughts on the budget?
I don't watch much news coverage because it is vapid. It's interesting to look at the backgrounds of senior political reporters etc. Of the ones I checked almost all are communications/journalism degrees, no political theory and no economics.
-
I've been wanting ECE hours at 2 for ages, now they finally do it, when it comes into effect my youngest will have just turned 3. Grrr.
-
@No-Quarter said in NZ Politics:
I've been wanting ECE hours at 2 for ages, now they finally do it, when it comes into effect my youngest will have just turned 3. Grrr.
I know people who work in this area, apparently the subsidy doesn't come close to covering the cost. So the centres do various tricks to claw back extra money
That's a hell of a lot more capacity they are asking the industry to provide. Then you add in recent pay changes on top of that... I wonder if the goal medium to long term is to nationalise most centres?
-
Probably a subscriber only article, so I'll post the lot below.
The world thinks of New Zealand as the land of the long white cloud. Renowned for its stunning natural beauty and resources, it is considered an island paradise. Or Godzone, as they used to call it, as in âGodâs own.â
But that was a long time ago â and not just because most Kiwis have since turned their backs on organised religion.
Instead, todayâs New Zealand feels like a country that has conspired to make itself poorer at every opportunity.
If someone had put the devil in charge of New Zealandâs politics, the outcome could have hardly been worse.
This is not a verdict on the current government, or at least not just that. Developments have been going in the wrong direction for many decades, under governments of all stripes, shapes and colours.
There is no better example than housing. To put matters into perspective, letâs calculate a few figures.
For every man, woman and child in New Zealand, there are 52,500 square metres of land. Even if one included the 23 million sheep in the calculation, that would still leave 9,600 square metres per capita.
And though such calculations are, of course, ridiculous, they make one thing abundantly clear: New Zealand is a large country with plenty of land but not many people (or even sheep) inhabiting it.
So how come, then, New Zealandâs housing is among the least affordable in the world?
On the face of it, it does not make much sense. And on further examination, it still doesnât.
There is no reason why New Zealand should be as unaffordable as it is. It is not as if large parts of New Zealand are uninhabitable (as in Australia). It is not as if the place is tiny and densely populated (as in Singapore). It is not as if New Zealand has a spectacularly rich economy (such as Norway).
No, New Zealandâs housing crisis is entirely self-inflicted. It is the result of a combination of rigid planning rules, ridiculous regulation of building materials, and a lack of funding tools for infrastructure.
Each of these three factors alone would put a dent in housing affordability. But New Zealand applied them all at once. And then some.
New Zealand has ludicrous planning rules which protect âheritageâ buildings, some of which are barely a few decades old. It uses âvolcanic viewshaftsâ to protect significant views of Aucklandâs volcanic cones (of which there are many). And it limits the ways in which its cities can grow up or out, with the predictable result that they do neither.
It is equally unsurprising, at least to economists, that where supply cannot respond to demand, prices rise. Which is exactly what they have done in New Zealandâs residential property market, for decades.
In the grand scheme of Kiwi self-sabotage, urban strangulation is a masterpiece. But it is far from the only one.
For decades, New Zealanders have wondered why international capital only enters the country to finance mortgages. Some have blamed the countryâs Australian-owned banks for making a buck on the back of the crazy housing market.
The real answer to this conundrum, however, is New Zealandâs rigid Foreign Direct Investment regime.
The Overseas Investment Act is a piece of legislation designed to discourage, rather than attract, foreign capital. It is like a welcome mat that says, âPlease wipe your feet, but donât come in.â
Or, in the words of the Act itself, âThe purpose of this Act is to acknowledge that it is a privilege for overseas persons to own or control sensitive New Zealand assets.â And note that New Zealanders are highly sensitive when it comes to defining âsensitive assetsâ. Practically everything is so designated.
The result: New Zealand only attracts between US$2-3 billion of investment in a good year â which puts it in a league with countries like Guatemala, Latvia and Uzbekistan. Meanwhile, more welcoming jurisdictions like Denmark, Ireland or Austria receive several times that amount. And several times the business and growth opportunities.
And it is not just companies that will not feel particularly welcome to set up tents in New Zealand. It is people, too.
If you are a foreigner wanting to emigrate to New Zealand, be prepared to wait. The process Immigration New Zealand runs is so slow these days that by the time you get your visa, you might have forgotten why you wanted to go in the first place. No wonder that New Zealand is missing out on international talent.
Ambitious people do not have time to wait. Neither, by the way, do the organisations that want to employ them.
On the other hand, the time waiting for your visa would have taught you a vital skill for life in New Zealand: patience. Because good things take time. And bad things, too.
Nothing in New Zealand gets done in a hurry. Yes, the health system is falling apart. Okay, many New Zealand children leave school unable to read, write or calculate. And sure, it would have been nice to build that second harbour crossing for Auckland. Or some decent roads, for that matter.
But regardless of how pressing the challenges are, the immediate response is always to do nothing.
Grudgingly followed by a working group. Then garnished with small armies of consultants. Eventually culminating in planning delays and finished with a grand centralisation plan â and even then, rounded off with a botched implementation, a few decades later.
It is a tragedy what is happening in New Zealand. This country, more than almost any other, could have been the rising star of the 21st century. With the worldâs economic gravity shifting towards Asia, New Zealand is in a good geographic spot â for the first time in its history, actually.
New Zealand could have built on the good reputation of its education system, which once upon a time was world-class.
New Zealand could have built modern cities with decent infrastructure and affordable housing. It has all the land it needs.
It could have even reformed more quickly thanks to its unicameral system with fewer checks and balances than most countries.
This year, 2023, is an election year in New Zealand. And perhaps this is the countryâs last chance to wake from its slumber and try something new. Some policies that use New Zealandâs natural advantages to become a place of ambition, opportunity and prosperity. Even if it means a radical departure from its path to mediocrity.
If the time for that is not now, then when?
-
The free buses for kids 12 and under, or what ever it is and half price for those under 25, while helps a good number, particularly in Auckland, in many other places it is a non-event.
I honestly dont see anything in there to help me, nor my children as they transition into the world of adulting.
Sadly so much of our infrastructure has had so little spent on it, coupled with the weather events, NZ is in a fragile state right now, the new $6b investment is but a drop in the bucket, especially with all the remdial work needing to be done to get it to a point of upgrading/updating.
-
@antipodean I didn't read the whole thing because I got distracted wondering when the author was going to mention supply and demand. A skim suggests that they didn't.
While the article raises some valid points it is disingenuous to ignore societal factors that have driven up housing prices, like all wanting to live in the same places, campaigns against intensification, land banking, immigration etc and blame it all on poor legislation.
-
@Duluth it's a bit meh
It isn't the Budget Labour led everybody to expect, nor is it the wanton spending National are trying to stigmatise it as.
I keep wondering how increased government spending puts money into circulation so drives up inflation yet tax cuts which put money into circulation won't.
The one thing I do think is structurally wrong is the tax thresholds.
-
-
@Higgins said in NZ Politics:
This guy is pulling no punches
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/132157503/damien-grant-chris-hipkins-fails-the-moral-and-competence-tests-to-be-pm?cx_testId=12&cx_testVariant=cx_1&cx_artPos=4#cxrecs_sPreaching to the choir here
-
@Higgins said in NZ Politics:
This guy is pulling no punches
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/132157503/damien-grant-chris-hipkins-fails-the-moral-and-competence-tests-to-be-pm?cx_testId=12&cx_testVariant=cx_1&cx_artPos=4#cxrecs_sNot going to comment on NZ Politics as I haven't lived there for decades, but I looked at the educational figures (and others) and was staggered. I've always found my 1970's NZ education may have been a bit narrow, but clearly stood up well globally and qualifications like NZCE as good as, if not better, than equivalents in other countries.
This sort of stuff takes a while to turn around too.
-
@Tim said in NZ Politics:
I'm eternally waiting for someone to mention GDP per Capita, let alone productivity measures.
Heck no, that'd require some challenging of fundamental core beliefs and comfort-blanket assumptions. And then there'd probably be the accusations of racism for comparing different countries.
-
I'm a little sceptical of GDP but it seems far more useful and transparent than many surveys of happiness.
https://www.accaglobal.com/gb/en/member/member/accounting-business/2019/10/insights/gdp-wealth.html
-
Good to see Labour putting the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff again with thier multi-million dollar investment in fog cannons.
NZ Politics