-
@Nepia said in It's the language police again:
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
@jegga said in It's the language police again:
Last year there were a lot of ethots getting doxxed and having the irs set on them because they weren’t declaring the money they were earning on Patreon etc .
I am so pleased with myself for understanding that.
I can kind if understand it all. I don't know what ethots is but assume it's women who like taking their clothes off on the internet.
Ok boomer
-
@Duluth are they running words together including spaces? say if you have the word supeR, which ends in an R is immediately prior to ape, is it running the together to get the trigger word?
@dogmeat post above refers to another word for curtains, which has a 'd' in the front but would be a trigger word, is that sort of thing triggering it too?
-
@taniwharugby I'm sure it's smarter than that. It'll read sentences etc
-
@Duluth said in It's the language police again:
It'll read sentences etc
So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt. The internet is doomed by a company that helped create it and nobody will ever go beyond txt spk spllg.
How Orwellian of you ggl.
-
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt.
There are plenty of conversations that fit within the guidelines. I don't think we fail on anything under the sexual list here.
-
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
@Duluth said in It's the language police again:
It'll read sentences etc
So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt. The internet is doomed by a company that helped create it and nobody will ever go beyond txt spk spllg.
How Orwellian of you ggl.
ggl can lck the salt from the bttm of my sweaty trpcl blls
-
@Duluth said in It's the language police again:
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt.
There are plenty of conversations that fit within the guidelines. I don't think we fail on anything under the sexual list here.
I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:
contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane languageThose guys don't support the Black Claps. Difficult to support them without expletives.
(Ah I said clap - that's a slang word for a disease).
I really don't know what will be acceptable and you might as well shut it all down.Our attempts to express ourselves with poor spelling won't work. Fork.
Is that actually their problem?
-
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
@Duluth said in It's the language police again:
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt.
There are plenty of conversations that fit within the guidelines. I don't think we fail on anything under the sexual list here.
I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:
contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane languageThose guys don't support the Black Claps. Difficult to support them without expletives.
(Ah I said clap - that's a slang word for a disease).
I really don't know what will be acceptable and you might as well shut it all down.Our attempts to express ourselves with poor spelling won't work. Fork.
Is that actually their problem?
wait until the Warriors kick off. And it becomes apparent certain Super teams are not at the expected levels
But that will be nothing, nothing i tell you, compared to if we get to June and the ABs are utterly hopeless under Foster. We'll be blacklisted forever.
-
@mariner4life The dark web awaits.
-
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
@mariner4life The dark web awaits.
sweet, i'll be able to buy some sinister shit without having to change browsers
-
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:
contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane languageNope. That's under 'Shocking Content'.
It's the 'Sexual content' list that we've gotten in trouble for (it this rule everytime)
-
@Duluth said in It's the language police again:
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:
contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane languageNope. That's under 'Shocking Content'.
It's the 'Sexual content' list that we've gotten in trouble for (it this rule everytime)
we, posters of the fern, are nothing if not sexual beings
-
@Duluth said in It's the language police again:
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:
contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane languageNope. That's under 'Shocking Content'.
It's the 'Sexual content' list that we've gotten in trouble for (it this rule everytime)
I feel like I might be partly responsible for this .
-
@Duluth O.K. They are seeing things that I aren't, but I'm not easily offended by sexuality.
A few more software modifications? We already know what fluffybunny, is and piston wristed gibbon, so add the R word and probably F word? We will know what is being said.
-
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
@jegga said in It's the language police again:
Last year there were a lot of ethots getting doxxed and having the irs set on them because they weren’t declaring the money they were earning on Patreon etc .
I am so pleased with myself for understanding that.
Was about to say I didn't
-
@booboo said in It's the language police again:
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
@jegga said in It's the language police again:
Last year there were a lot of ethots getting doxxed and having the irs set on them because they weren’t declaring the money they were earning on Patreon etc .
I am so pleased with myself for understanding that.
Was about to say I didn't
But you did read it, so pat on the back for that.
-
@booboo said in It's the language police again:
@Snowy said in It's the language police again:
@jegga said in It's the language police again:
Last year there were a lot of ethots getting doxxed and having the irs set on them because they weren’t declaring the money they were earning on Patreon etc .
I am so pleased with myself for understanding that.
Was about to say I didn't
Thot - that ho over there
-
@Paekakboyz said in It's the language police again:
This has been going on for years with gaming streamers on the major platforms (twitch and youtube). Any number of streamers, including some pretty edgy mofo's, have really reined in their language to stay within the platform rules. There are always a few instances of streamers being banned or suspended for X, Y, Z behaviour which often involves 'bad' language or going hard at someone (aka bullying). But generally people think it has improved the scene - if only Twitch would grow a pair and start banning the blatant booty/boobie streamers - that's an entire meme universe in itself.
-
It's the language police again
