SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
-
-
@KiwiMurph fair play, I just can’t see that happening though with the WC so close and Ardie probably being our best over the year last year.
I do get what you’re saying though, the balance of our loosies just doesn’t work does it.
-
Turnovers at key moments as well.
Maybe not great, but not utter shite like many other Blues AB's.
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Is this the worst Blues performance of all time?
We’ve put 50 on the Blues at least once before.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@KiwiMurph said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
I personally think Ardie should be a specialist AB bench player where I think he could be so influential 2nd half and have a traditional 8 like Jacobson or Grace starting.
I used to think that but Ardie’s engine and test experience is pretty invaluable for us right now. We need him on the field for as long as possible.
He has a big engine because he leans on rucks.
-
@KiwiMurph said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Is this the worst Blues performance of all time?
They almost lost to MP
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Only Blues who haven't damaged their AB chances are Sullivan & Paps
And Plummer...
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Turnovers at key moments as well.
Maybe not great, but not utter shite like many other Blues AB's.
I don't think Paps has been any better than the much maligned Ioane bros. Granted, better than Barrett, Christie and the two fatties in the front row though.
-
Best kick all night by the Blues, by Eklund
-
@Tim said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Crusaders find gaps at will in Blues backline. The defence has been completely out smarted
Crusaders have just been running simple dummy lines and the blues have bought it every time, often several players in one movement.
Really bizarre.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Best kick all night by the Blues, by Eklund
Could be a good combo if Barrett can start throwing to the lineout...
-
@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Only Blues who haven't damaged their AB chances are Sullivan & Paps
And Plummer...
Oh shut up
-
How does the TMO not know that should be a penalty instead of gifting the lineout throw to the Crusaders? You can't go pushing players.
-
We all know Foster wont select on form... so maybe everyone has already got their tickets booked?
-
-
@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Only Blues who haven't damaged their AB chances are Sullivan & Paps
And Plummer...
Oh shut up
My feed is slightly delayed, I thought you were running multis, until my feed caught up.
-
@antipodean said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
How does the TMO not know that should be a penalty instead of gifting the lineout throw to the Crusaders? You can't go pushing players.
Or the commentators.
Or the on-field ref. -
@Mattasaurus said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
We all know Foster wont select on form... so maybe everyone has already got their tickets booked?
Well team won't be getting picked on tonight's game I wouldn't think, the names will all be in by now.
