2018 Football World Cup
-
@bovidae said in 2018 Football World Cup:
Neymar earns €865,000 per week at PSG, excluding any endorsement deals
Having never earned €865,000 per week, I'm not sure I'd waste my valuable downtime doing endorsements.
At best I'd take retainers not to shit on their products. Until I did, and then you could elect not to pay the next month's retainer.
-
So 4-4 in predictions that round
I'm going
France
Brazil
England
Russia -
Do goals scored in penalty shoot outs count towards the Golden Boot?
If so, Kane is going to be hard to beat
-
@mikethesnow said in 2018 Football World Cup:
Do goals scored in penalty shoot outs count towards the Golden Boot?
If so, Kane is going to be hard to beat
Negative.
-
@antipodean said in 2018 Football World Cup:
@bovidae said in 2018 Football World Cup:
Neymar earns €865,000 per week at PSG, excluding any endorsement deals
Having never earned €865,000 per week, I'm not sure I'd waste my valuable downtime doing endorsements.
At best I'd take retainers not to shit on their products. Until I did, and then you could elect not to pay the next month's retainer.
If I earned that sort of coin in about four weeks I’d have no septum left after hoovering enough coke to kill a family of polar bears of hookers arses .
-
@mariner4life said in 2018 Football World Cup:
@bovidae said in 2018 Football World Cup:
Neymar earns €865,000 per week at PSG, excluding any endorsement deals. He's not starving either way.
He's a young flash fluffybunny with tats and fucked haircut with a ma-hoosive profile. Kids fucking love him. And the people who eat up soccer endorsements don't give a flying fuck about his antics. He's all good.
Massively over rated as a player though. No way he is worth what PSG are paying him.
In terms of skill, there's not a footballer at this tournament who is remotely worth what he's paid. Even Ronaldo who actually is quite skillful. Most of them you can't trust not to blast the ball over an open goal.
Mind you, Mark Zuckerberg basically gets paid a Ferrari every time he takes a shit, so the inequity is relative.
-
-
@chris-b True, but they're not paid for their football skill. They're paid because they sell jerseys and people will come to watch them.
There must be room for a real moneyball strategy, where you buy actually by player value. But I doubt many owners would wear it. The Glazers maybe.
-
For those that are interested, here are the ref appointments for the QFs. I am surprised an Argie gets a game involving Uruguay.
Uruguay – France
Referee: Nestor Pitana (ARG)
Assistant Referee 1: Hernan Maidana (ARG)
Assistant Referee 2: Juan Belatti (ARG)Brazil – Belgium
Referee: Milorad Mažić (SRB)
Assistant Referee 1: Milovan Ristić (SRB)
Assistant Referee 2: Dalibor Djurdjević (SRB)Sweden – England
Referee: Björn Kuipers (NED)
Assistant Referee 1: Sander van Roekel (NED)
Assistant Referee 2: Erwin Zeinstra (NED)Russia – Croatia
Referee: Sandro Ricci (BRA)
Assistant Referee 1: Emerson de Carvalho (BRA)
Assistant Referee 2: Marcello Van Gasse (BRA) -
-
Did I hear in their commentary that Sweden were 250 to 1 outsiders?
If so WTF? How can any European team, even Iceland, be 250 to 1? Soccer is so open to upset, or even draws, that a competitive team with pro-players from the best leagues will be more than good enough to force results.
I seem to recall back in 1982 NZ were 500 to 1. In my mind that doesn't seem a lot different to 250 to 1 and the All Whites had no hope of getting out of their group let alone win a knock out game.
Which brings me to my next random thought about that 82 WC that pools seemed to have two distinct favourites to advance and two minnows. Much like the RWC still seems to be.
IIRC (at least it was the first time I heard it applied) the term "Group of Death" was in the 86 FIFA WC.*
Suggesting that then and before the top two seeds in each group were expected to advance.
Nowadays I'm not sure it's quite so clear cut.
Although as I type this I'm looking at the pools and you'd pick most of those that didn't advance (... with the exception of Germany.)
-
- Close. Wiki says it was "popularised" in 86
-
-
Ok.
We're starting a new phase, so from those who are left in
-
Who do you think is going to win?
-
Who do you want to win?
In answer:
-
Belgium (remembering I know nothing of soccer)
-
Sweden. I developed a soft spot for them back during some previous WC where they did really well. Can't remember which one.
If not them then England. They seem a likable team, especially Southgate
-
-
- Brazil. I hate Neymar but they play with great flair and their defence is solid this time around
- England. They, like their rugby counterparts, play a prehistoric brand of football and their players don't have the skill set to play a more creative way. But I have a sentimental attachment back to my childhood, and they seem a relatively decent bunch
-
@chester-draws said in 2018 Football World Cup:
@chris-b True, but they're not paid for their football skill. They're paid because they sell jerseys and people will come to watch them.
There must be room for a real moneyball strategy, where you buy actually by player value. But I doubt many owners would wear it. The Glazers maybe.
Shahid Khan owner of Fulham (& Jacksonville Jaguars) and erstwhile purchaser of Wembley is a fan of Moneyball and appointed a Transfer Manager to oversee a strategy that incorporated Moneyball but wasn't exclusively based upon it.
Given the only change to the Fulham squad since the end of season has to be lose one of the guys they would have wanted to keep I don't know they have a strategy now. Hopefully once WC is over Khan will dip into his 5.5 Bill of funds and strengthen the squad. Would not want him to buy success like Chelski or Citeh though - it wouldn't be Fulham if we weren't flirting with disaster
Fulham have just been promoted to Premiership ......
.....but only after they sacked the Transfer supremo and adopted a more traditional strategy i.e. ask the Manager what he needed to win promotion and then go for it
-
@dogmeat But the point of Moneyball is not to win promotion. The point is to make more money.
If you are top of the Championship and dragging in good crowds with a cheap team, then promotion is a double-edged sword. Especially if it means big time transfers.
As I say, people won't wear it! They think it is about how to win cheaply.
-
@chester-draws said in 2018 Football World Cup:
@dogmeat But the point of Moneyball is not to win promotion. The point is to make more money.
If you are top of the Championship and dragging in good crowds with a cheap team, then promotion is a double-edged sword. Especially if it means big time transfers.
As I say, people won't wear it! They think it is about how to win cheaply.
Daniel Levy is the moneyball master by that metric
