Euthanasia yes or no
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crazy Horse" data-cid="605763" data-time="1471318222">
<div>
<p>Euthanasia, or state sponsored suicide, could not only help the terminally ill, it could help other people too. I guess the problem is, if we let the terminally ill end their life on their own terms, what about giving everyone else that right? Where does it end?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>For adults, I'd say they should be able to make application, spend time with a psychologist and go on their merry way. After all, if someone really wants to kill themselves, you're not going to stop them.</p> -
<p>I'm for it, in a controlled environment with the checks and balances.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I've sat with a few dying relatives, and it was horrific. Can't eat, can't sleep, doped up on morphine that doesn't even take the edge off the agony, slowly drowning to death because their lungs can't cope anymore. I wanted to punch certain other people in the face - everyone had said goodbye, but still they made these poor people suffer with poking and prodding and more drugs, not willing to let them go to peace.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>That is neither decent nor humane. It's fucking selfish cruelty. And I hated them for it.</p> -
<p>It could actually be a strong positive from a mental health point of view, if its made open to anyone who goes through the process for a lot of non medically ill people the process itself could get them the help they need to no longer want to die.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>IE if you are suicidal & hiding it & can end your life this way, you just need to have 5 chats with a shrink. For many the 5 chats with the shrink may well open up treatment or options that you didn't know you had.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In most cases where people top themselves or attempt it, people around them had no idea they were that down & the people themselves haven't explored their options because they've been too depressed.</p> -
And what are the 'right' reasons for wanting to die and who gets to define it?
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crazy Horse" data-cid="605892" data-time="1471387433">
<div>
<p>And what are the 'right' reasons for wanting to die and who gets to define it?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I'd argue that in a totally free society its up to the individual to decide, BUT they should be doing so with a clear view of their options. EG someone under huge debt, afraid of losing their house wants to kill themselves, goes through the mandatory counselling & finds out they can declare bankruptsy & the house can't go because its half owned by theiur spouse. Shit like that. People who top themseleves very rarely clearly think shit through, if they have & approached the decision rationally why not let them do it?</p> -
<p>Like Crazy Horse, I've been to more suicides than I care to remember, lots of them involving people who were elderly or people who had terminal illnesses. All of them are tragic in their own right, but the one that most sticks out for me was a person who had taken their own life because their advanced MS was becoming so hard to live with that they didn't feel it was worth living anymore. We turned up at the address because we had been called by the frontline guys, who had thought there was a bit more to the story than the deceased's spouse was letting on. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The room was littered with right to die books and in one was a DVD with a note to the Police saying "please watch this". In it, the deceased, aged in their late 40's outlined over the course of 15 minutes how they didn't feel that they were committing suicide, because they didn't want to die, but they felt they had no choice because their quality of life was such that they could no longer toilet themselves, wash themselves or even leave the house to do the things they used to enjoy, so they were just sitting around waiting for their body to shut down. It was one of the most haunting things I had ever watched, I swear someone was cutting onions in the office as I sat there and watched it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We ended up charging the spouse with assisting the suicide. I sure as hell didn't want to, because I in all honesty would have seriously considered doing the same thing for someone I loved who was suffering like that, but we were directed to by the hierarchy. The evidence suggested that the deceased would have been unable to buy and put together all the items needed for their contraption, so the spouse had bought them and helped the deceased set it up and then left the house knowing what they were going to do. The spouse then went and got an alibi at a local coffee shop before going back home knowing what they would find. The most horrendous tragedy in it all was that the deceased had to die alone in their room because the law prevented their spouse from sitting there with them and comforting them in their last moments.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Long story, the spouse got a great lawyer, pleaded guilty and got discharged without conviction. Since that day, I've been pro-euthanasia, prior to it I was neither here nor there. </p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="606427" data-time="1471516595">
<div>
<p>Fuck. I could never do your job.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>You could, you'd just be a loose canon who refused to play by the rules. And was due to retire next week.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="606427" data-time="1471516595">
<div>
<p>Fuck. I could never do your job.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>It had it's moments. The suicides were generally always the hardest because it almost always involved a really devastated and traumatised family searching for questions. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Someone earlier on posed an interesting question about where do you draw the line as to who would and wouldn't be eligible for euthanasia. Terminal illness, significant loss of quality of life etc. I read an article recently about a girl in her 20's who was considered eligible for euthanasia because doctors agreed she had incurable PTSD as a result of severe sexual abuse she suffered between the age of 5 and 15. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sex-abuse-victim-in-her-20s-allowed-by-dutch-doctors-to-undergo-euthanasia-due-to-severe-ptsd-a7023666.html'>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sex-abuse-victim-in-her-20s-allowed-by-dutch-doctors-to-undergo-euthanasia-due-to-severe-ptsd-a7023666.html</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Or would you allow someone who is paralysed from the neck down as the result of an to be euthanised, given their quality of life would be so severely affected? </p>
<p> </p>
<p>As I said earlier, I'm pro euthanasia, but I wouldn't want to be the one responsible for drawing up guidelines around how and when it can be used. </p> -
Dear god that poor woman in Holland that asked to die<br><br>
What the poor wee bugger must have gone through<br><br>
To continually ask health professionals to please grant you permission to end it all. I found the reponses at the bottom of the article to be extremely callous in relation to the girl in the situation