Coronavirus - New Zealand
-
@tewaio why wouldn't a public heath expert (which Dr Bloomfield is - that's his medical specialty) present public health advice that higher is better? He also acknowledged today in response to a question of "when would 90% be reached" that modelling gave them forecasts (4-5 weeks), but actually it's down to individuals to go and get vaccinated.
Meanwhile, looks like the police have caught up with one of the clowns:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300432470/covid19-police-arrest-man-over-party-on-aucklands-north-shore -
@jc said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
Have I missed something? Has anybody in power actually said, categorically, that if we reach this 90% vaccination rate we will no longer have lockdowns? No?
We got an announcement today of an announcement on Friday, but it sounded more promising than previous announcements of announcements. 90% is just the number commonly put forward by ministers and the DG, you're right that it currently has no official link to anything. Hopefully that changes on Friday and a link is added.
-
@jc said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
Have I missed something? Has anybody in power actually said, categorically, that if we reach this 90% vaccination rate we will no longer have lockdowns? No?
The only thing they are good at is announcing when the next announcement is
-
@godder said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@jc said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
Have I missed something? Has anybody in power actually said, categorically, that if we reach this 90% vaccination rate we will no longer have lockdowns? No?
We got an announcement today of an announcement on Friday, but it sounded more promising than previous announcements of announcements. 90% is just the number commonly put forward by ministers and the DG, you're right that it currently has no official link to anything. Hopefully that changes on Friday and a link is added.
This is no way to run a country, it’s embarrassing.
I was trying to explain our situation to my family in the US and they were really confused about why we were still locked down at all (democrats).
Our vaccination rate is already higher than other countries opening up.
-
@jc said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
Have I missed something? Has anybody in power actually said, categorically, that if we reach this 90% vaccination rate we will no longer have lockdowns? No?
Trying to read between the lines because, again, we have no firm plan communicated, but my concern is the 90% target is for Māori and PI groups. (Based off Bloomfield’s comments).
It might even include groups they deem vulnerable that want protected before opening up.
Looking at the vax rates breakdown so far, that’s months away if I’m being generous.
-
@kirwan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@jc said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
Have I missed something? Has anybody in power actually said, categorically, that if we reach this 90% vaccination rate we will no longer have lockdowns? No?
Trying to read between the lines because, again, we have no firm plan communicated, but my concern is the 90% target is for Māori and PI groups. (Based off Bloomfield’s comments).
It might even include groups they deem vulnerable that want protected before opening up.
Looking at the vax rates breakdown so far, that’s months away if I’m being generous.
According to the experts we need to reach 90% across all ethnicities and communities. Unsure if that also includes the anti-vax community.
-
-
@kirwan That’s my take on it too. This is a situation where this government’s best instincts may not serve us well. I think it’s critical to them that they are believed to be good, virtuous people, above all else. They’re in a difficult position and they can’t do the right thing because they want to do the good thing.
They know that if they relax the rules some people will die and many will get sick. And because of their low vaccination rates and higher rates of co-morbidities, a disproportionately large number will likely be Māori.
We can already see from recent new stories that some commentators see the Covid response as having a racist element to it, and if Māori people start getting sick and dying in greater numbers than the non-Māori population it’s inevitable that narrative will gain more credence. That would be difficult for any government but for one which puts such store in their perceived virtue as this one, it would be untenable to be accused of racism.
They have to know that they are in a bad position no matter what happens from here. I think they’d rather choose the option that leaves them looking most virtuous, whatever the cost to the rest of us.
-
@jc From the article I posted:
Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins told Checkpoint there was still a lot of detail to work through with the plan.
"We need to make sure any targets we set are having the desired effect. It's not just about saying, it's 90 per cent across the board, we actually have to look at making sure that we don't have high concentration pockets of unvaccinated people within the community.
-
RNZ understands ministers were due to consider a traffic light-like system New Zealand could move to once the population is highly vaccinated.
It could move the next phase away from using alert level restrictions to a mix of protective measures in the event of outbreaks.
That could include mask use, gathering limits, social distancing, proof of vaccination and scanning.
It could be some months before it would be ready to be implemented.
As with ever other idea to reduce impact, it is hamstrung by the government's lack of capabilities and competence.
-
@tim said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
RNZ understands ministers were due to consider a traffic light-like system New Zealand could move to once the population is highly vaccinated.
It could move the next phase away from using alert level restrictions to a mix of protective measures in the event of outbreaks.
That could include mask use, gathering limits, social distancing, proof of vaccination and scanning.
It could be some months before it would be ready to be implemented.
As with ever other idea to reduce impact, it is hamstrung by the government's lack of capabilities and competence.
It would be typical if they get it going about May so that things kick off as you start to get the cold weather. They should be trying to maximize the spread during summer.
-
And here is exactly why its just lunacy to hold an entire country hostage to a small group of uninformed people.
"we choose that option"?? Fucking do you mate???
How about you exercise your right to not get jabbed, I'm OK with that. But the Government should be opening up the country whether you like it or not.
I have long made the distinction that the benchmark for opening up should be x% of people having the opportunity to get the jab. We cannot be restricted because small groups decide not to for whatever reason.
-
@jc said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@kirwan That’s my take on it too. This is a situation where this government’s best instincts may not serve us well. I think it’s critical to them that they are believed to be good, virtuous people, above all else. They’re in a difficult position and they can’t do the right thing because they want to do the good thing.
They know that if they relax the rules some people will die and many will get sick. And because of their low vaccination rates and higher rates of co-morbidities, a disproportionately large number will likely be Māori.
We can already see from recent new stories that some commentators see the Covid response as having a racist element to it, and if Māori people start getting sick and dying in greater numbers than the non-Māori population it’s inevitable that narrative will gain more credence. That would be difficult for any government but for one which puts such store in their perceived virtue as this one, it would be untenable to be accused of racism.
They have to know that they are in a bad position no matter what happens from here. I think they’d rather choose the option that leaves them looking most virtuous, whatever the cost to the rest of us.
It'll also come at the cost of increased racism towards Māori. It's going to be an absolute shitshow if they make announcements along the lines of "Auckland can't move to level 2 yet because Māori vaccination rates are still too low".
I wonder if the reason why they've been avoiding targets is because they were hoping it would have resolved itself by now.
-
Is there anything special about Maori ethnic group which have led to their lower vaccination rates?
If I was leader, I'd use the stick.
In x number of days we end lockdowns and maybe open the border soon after.
If you and you family are not vaccinated and you choose to put them at risk - that's YOUR fault.
If they die because you couldn't be assed getting vaccinated - that's YOUR fault.
Whatever happened to self-responsibility??? -
@anonymous said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@jc said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@kirwan That’s my take on it too. This is a situation where this government’s best instincts may not serve us well. I think it’s critical to them that they are believed to be good, virtuous people, above all else. They’re in a difficult position and they can’t do the right thing because they want to do the good thing.
They know that if they relax the rules some people will die and many will get sick. And because of their low vaccination rates and higher rates of co-morbidities, a disproportionately large number will likely be Māori.
We can already see from recent new stories that some commentators see the Covid response as having a racist element to it, and if Māori people start getting sick and dying in greater numbers than the non-Māori population it’s inevitable that narrative will gain more credence. That would be difficult for any government but for one which puts such store in their perceived virtue as this one, it would be untenable to be accused of racism.
They have to know that they are in a bad position no matter what happens from here. I think they’d rather choose the option that leaves them looking most virtuous, whatever the cost to the rest of us.
It'll also come at the cost of increased racism towards Māori. It's going to be an absolute shitshow if they make announcements along the lines of "Auckland can't move to level 2 yet because Māori vaccination rates are still too low".
I wonder if the reason why they've been avoiding targets is because they were hoping it would have resolved itself by now.
That was where I was going. Focusing on ethnic groups for this sort of policy will have unintended consequences.
Identify politics is not how to run a country.
It also infantilises a group of people IMO. If a community chooses, despite all available information, to not take the vaccine then the government has done all they can. Like was said above, everyone needs the opportunity.