-
@Crucial said in US Politics:
@Winger do some reading about what 'originalist' actually means in regards to SC.
What you quoted above has it wrong.
i have. But this is a good case to show the difference
with leftist activist Justice Kagan believing that federal judges should be allowed to make up new laws when needed, as opposed to originalist Justice Kavanaugh believing that federal judges are strictly constrained by laws’ words exactly as they are written, which means that if someone doesn’t like what a law says, legislators elected by citizens are free to change them, not unelected federal judges.
-
@Winger said in US Politics:
@Crucial said in US Politics:
@Winger do some reading about what 'originalist' actually means in regards to SC.
What you quoted above has it wrong.
i have. But this is a good case to show the difference
with leftist activist Justice Kagan believing that federal judges should be allowed to make up new laws when needed, as opposed to originalist Justice Kavanaugh believing that federal judges are strictly constrained by laws’ words exactly as they are written, which means that if someone doesn’t like what a law says, legislators elected by citizens are free to change them, not unelected federal judges.
Yes. That's the bit that is incorrect in its definitions.
The writer is describing textualism not originalism -
no idea how true the commentary but an interesting read on the swing states
-
@Rembrandt nah, they'll likely have a T&C that relates to a subset of something shared I reckon. So they can dance on the head of a pin and say A, B, C was fine but that Z bit violated terms. Wouldn't be surprised if their T&Cs are undergoing constant revamp to 'manage' this.
-
@Paekakboyz Likely or they'll put it down as a 'mistake' from a junior member of staff.
More revelations on Tucker today
-
@Rembrandt revelations I still lol at the lawsuit where Fox lawyers said you should be careful about believing what Tucker says.
""Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes.""
Much in the vein of ol Brownlee's boo boo prior to the election about 'just putting ideas out there", and 'asking questions'.
I do wonder how long the reporting will last post-election... probably depends on the outcome aye
-
-
Sounds like Fox has lost the only copy of all that damming evidence on Biden...
-
@Paekakboyz said in US Politics:
Sounds like Fox has lost the only copy of all that damming evidence on Biden...
Must have got lost in Trump's postal service on the way to the FBI
-
@Paekakboyz said in US Politics:
Sounds like Fox has lost the only copy of all that damming evidence on Biden...
Fox took copies (one journalist actually bothered to ask)
-
@Duluth said in US Politics:
@Paekakboyz said in US Politics:
Sounds like Fox has lost the only copy of all that damming evidence on Biden...
Fox took copies (one journalist actually bothered to ask)
That's sooooo old school. Haven't they heard of the cloud?
-
@canefan said in US Politics:
@reprobate said in US Politics:
@canefan comedy gold.
Except they are being 100% dead serious
Yeah, when you read that steaming pile - where we actually know the truth - it does cast just a wee smidgeon of doubt over how they report things we don't know about first-hand.
US Politics